eBook - ePub
The Greek Plays
Ellen McLaughlin
This is a test
Share book
- 240 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
The Greek Plays
Ellen McLaughlin
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
New adaptations of Greek masterpieces. Performed at major universities nationwide.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoās features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youāll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weāve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is The Greek Plays an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access The Greek Plays by Ellen McLaughlin in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Literature & American Drama. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Oedipus
dp n="332" folio="312" ?dp n="333" folio="313" ?Introduction
Part 1
I was commissioned in early 2004 to write a new version of Oedipus for the Guthrie Theater in Minneapolis, to be directed by my old friend and collaborator, Lisa Peterson.
It was Lisa who had the idea for the production and Lisa who brought her suggestion to Joe Dowling, who not only took her up on it, but scheduled a slot for it in the next season, script unseen. Iām tremendously grateful to Lisa for her inspiration and to Joe for his faith in me and for the chance to work on the play.
To be honest, I had never been particularly drawn to Oedipus, though it is probably the only Greek play of which a majority of any audience would at least know the basic plot. My reluctance may have had to do with precisely that phenomenonāthe prospect of coping with two thousand plus years of scholarship and reverence was quite intimidating. But Lisaās interest in the play as a means of confronting the issue of American identity at this moment in history intrigued me. She felt that the play would provide a lens through which to look at our deep aversion to coming to terms with our own past and the consequences of our actions. That notion inspired me to look at the play differently.
I began to read translations and do research and, in April 2004, I wrote Lisa a letter, focusing on the aspects of the play I was beginning to be most interested in exploring.
dp n="334" folio="314" ?I enclose an edited version of the letter below:
Dear Lisa,
Just thought Iād put some notes together, the kinds of things Iāve been thinking about as I mull over the play and get to know it better. They are in no particular order.
ā¢ Iāve been trying to understand why I find this play somewhat repellent, and perhaps why I havenāt approached it before. I suppose that there is something disturbing to me about what I sense is a sort of ancient Greek version of original sin. The idea that this particular child at least is born a sinner, born doomed. He is fated not only to sufferāas are all menābut to do terrible things even as he thinks he is doing right. What should we learn from this? That the gods are to be feared? That when we search for the transgressor, the source of our sorrow, we must search first the house of our own soul?
Or is it that we learn from Oedipus the true price of self-knowledgeāthat to be human is to be both entirely innocent and entirely guilty, the holy/accursed thing that so few of us ever have the courage to confront in the mirror? Is the point that by the end of the play, Oedipus finally must acknowledge himself, for the first time, as being truly and simply humanāthe solution to the riddleāno longer exempt, no longer exceptional, except in the sense of being the most radical example of the constraint of being human? I am still quite flummoxed by this and expect to be thrashing it out for some time.
ā¢ Iād like to focus on telling the story so that itās more of an effective mystery. Time after time in the Sophocles, Oedipus is presented with so much information that it seems impossible he doesnāt put the mystery together. The denial is so great as to defy credulity.
The first moment that would demand rethinking would be Tiresiasā contribution to the story, such that heās not quite so explicit, so spang on the head about what will happen to Oedipus. What seems most important about what he tells Oedipus about the future is (a) that Oedipus is in fact the blind man and that his blindness will be manifest in time, and (b) that he is the monster he seeks.
Similarly, Iād like to look at Jocastaās contribution to the revelation and think in terms of honing down the information she gives, perhaps to the single revelation of the killing taking place at a crossroads. Otherwise thereās just too much of what she says that Oedipus simply canāt hear and believably still fail to put it together. Iāll be looking throughout for such opportunities, but these are the obvious ones at the moment.
ā¢ Considering the business of contemporary relevanceāhow does this play speak to our times? Well, how did it speak to its own times?
Oedipus was born of the dreadful combination of a plague year and a war year. The plague is attributed to Ares, the god the gods would exile if they could, who presided over ādeath breeding death,ā both war and pestilence. The play was, we think, written in 430 B.C., the plague year that was the second year of the Peloponnesian War, the war that would prove in time to be the undoing of the Athenian people and their civilization. The way the plague is describedāthis consuming, rampant image of death moving through the cityāmakes one think at the same time of what the war was doing to Athens. This must have had resonance for the audience, as it will have resonance for us, in the second year of what looks to be an unending war, as will the idea of a political leader who is, knowingly or not, the cause of his peopleās suffering.
ā¢ Numbers thread through the text. The three roads, the riddle of the Sphinx. But it is a rather crude mathāno numbers over four, the number needed for a childās locomotionāand that rudimentary, brutal math matches the blunt riddle of his life. The basic math of a normal life keeps eluding him. There should be two womenāmother and wifeārather than one. The puzzle of his existence keeps confounding him, because it is so obviously wrong, I suppose. One plus one keeps equaling one in his case. It happens again and again. He is the investigator of a crime, the prosecutor and the judge, but then he also turns out to be the criminal he has been pursuing and has already condemned. Similarly, he turns out to be both the physician and the disease he is attempting to eradicate. There is something about numbers counted out of sequence that may be of use. Oedipus is presented as a mathematician working out the fact that he is himself the solution to his own horrible problem.
ā¢ I am increasingly fascinated by the phenomenon of the crossroadsāthe place where all the various paths of a life, all the possibilities, converge in one fate. I think it may have something to do with the perception of the female sexual organs, that site of mystery and origin, the place where the line between the legs meets the V of the pubis.
There is a Pan-African notion of the trickster, a figure who is always l...