THE SECRETS OF PIRATE MANAGEMENT
Piracyâs peak in the eighteenth century lasted little more than a decade. But piratesâ swan song in the 1720s isnât a reflection on their ineffectiveness. On the contrary, as previously mentioned, pirates ingeniously extended their presence as the odds mounted against them. And while they lasted, pirates were incredibly successful, sometimes earning in only a few months what it might have taken forty years to earn in legitimate maritime employment. Piratesâ demise had little to do with their defects and much to do with a stronger government determined to exterminate them. That pirates lasted as long as they did without a government to maintain peace, or facilitate cooperation, among them is a testament to their effectiveness, not a strike against it. How many other rag-tag bands of miscreants succeeded in causing so much trouble for the worldâs greatest superpower in so little time? Not many. So, what was the secret to piratesâ success? For the answer to that question youâll have to enroll in Professor Blackbeardâs Management 101 class. And donât be late. I hear heâs got a hell of a temper.
MANAGEMENT 101, PROF. BLACKBEARD, T AND TH, 1:00â2:15, QUEEN ANNEâS REVENGE
There would be a lengthy waitlist for a management course taught by a pirate captain. And students wouldnât (or at least shouldnât) scurry to enroll in the course only to hear their pirate professorâs lectures recounting adventurous tales of his criminal life at sea. They would also hope for a seat in the class because of what they could learn from their pirate professor about successful management. Letâs take a look at the course syllabus.
WEEKS 1â2. FOLLOW THE BOOTY
Readings: Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations; Bernard Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees
Central Lesson: Greed is good.
The idea of allowing the lure of money to drive peopleâs behavior conjures up images of corporate mismanagementâembezzlement, fraud, and others kinds of self-dealing that benefit those at the top and harm pretty much everyone else. In no small part, this is because of the unfortunate misbehavior of a few. But whatâs overlooked in focusing on this small handful of exceptions is the regular, even routine, profit-driven behavior that results in socially desirable outcomes and makes everyone better off. In the words of Wall Streetâs Gordon Gekko, a modern-day pirate if there ever was one, âGreed is good.â
Itâs common to associate the âgoodnessâ or âbadnessâ of behavior with the âgoodnessâ or âbadnessâ of the motivations that drive it. But the nobility or ignobility of individualsâ motivations often bears no relationship, and in some cases even exhibits an inverse relationship, to the nobility or ignobility of the outcomes these motivations create. Sometimes the basest of intentions can produce the best of outcomes. The milk producer example used in chapter 1 to illustrate Adam Smithâs invisible hand principle is one case of this. Your milk producerâs motives arenât necessarily âgood.â Heâs not trying to help you. He doesnât care about you and doesnât even know you. The milk producer is just a businessman; heâs in it for the money. But his ignoble motives donât prevent âgoodâ outcomes. They donât, for instance, prevent you from getting the milk you want at a price you can afford. On the contrary, the milk producerâs ignoble motives are precisely the reason you do get milk. As Adam Smith put it, âIt is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.â The milk producerâs greed compels him to serve you. As a result, you get the milk you desire at the best possible price.
The profit motive is the most reliable way to make sure your needs get met. Without the grocerâs greed, youâd be scratching for turnips in your backyard. Without your landlordâs greed, youâd be living in a tree house somewhere. And without your employerâs greed, you wouldnât have a job. The beauty of markets is that they harness individualsâ greed and make it service other peopleâs desires. Remove the lure of riches and you remove your best shot at living a materially enriched life.
The important difference between the nobility of individualsâ motivations and the actual outcomes their behavior produces sheds important light on how we should go about evaluating pirates. Pirates may have been âbadâ men, motivated by ignoble desires, and even willing to use violent means to satisfy these desires. But the outcomes of their profit-motivated behavior were sometimes laudable. For example, profit seeking is what led pirates to avoid blasting their prizes to pieces. It also prevented them from wantonly brutalizing their captives. And it limited their reliance on conscripts. Of course, in each of these cases, piratical greed didnât lead to genuine public âbenefits.â Piratesâ victims would have always been better off if they hadnât faced the threat pirates posed in the first place. But conditional on piratesâ presence, piratesâ ignoble motivesâself-interested greedâsoftened the harms pirate victims suffered.
Even more significantly, pirate greed is what motivated pirates to pioneer progressive institutions and practices. For example, this greed is responsible for piratesâ system of constitutional democracyâa system virtually unknown in the legitimate seventeenth- and eighteenth-century world. Itâs responsible for piratesâ system of social insurance. Pirate greed is also responsible for some sea roguesâ superior treatment of blacks. In each of these cases, ignoble pirate motivesâindeed, as greedy criminals, ignobility in the extremeâgenerated âenlightenedâ outcomes consistent with some of the modern worldâs most heralded values, such as democracy, equality, and social safety.
Pirates didnât embrace âenlightenedâ values as ends in and of themselves. They embraced money. But their tireless pursuit of the latter gave way to the desirable outcomes associated with the former and did so before their legitimate contemporaries achieved anything like the same. As examined in chapter 3, for instance, piratical institutions reflected the brilliance of Madisonâs arguments for democratically divided power more than half a century before Madison wrote them down. In this sense pirates were harbingers of our most sacred ideas about social organization. Americaâs Founding Fathers, to borrow the slogan of a popular pirate-inspired rum, âhad a little Captain in them.â This is why I say pirates deserve more of our respect rather than less of it. In these ways pirates were truly pioneers, or at least provided early testimony of the workability of a society that embraced these values. And in this sense we should be decidedly, and unabashedly, âpropirate.â âGreed,â as Gordon Gekko put it, âis right. Greed worksâŚ. Greed, in all of its forms ⌠has marked the upward surge of mankind.â A real pirate couldnât have said it better himself.
WEEKS 3â4. LEAVE YER UTOPIA BUILDINâ AT MADAGASCAR
Readings: Ludwig von Mises, Socialism; F. A. Hayek, âThe Use of Knowledge in Society,â American Economic Review
Central Lesson: Let your business drive your thinking about managerial organization, not the other way around.
Pirate ships confronted many of the problems legitimate businesses face in attempting to maximize profits. Foremost among these are preventing...