1
INTRODUCTION
The ultimate aim of this book is to present a picture of the inner life, heart, and soul of New York City, to apprehend its spirit and make it come alive for the reader. I set out to do this by learning how the residents of the city experience their lives as people and as New Yorkers. The essence of the city is its people. By their actions and interactions they determine the shape it assumes, the flow of its daily life, and the aspirations and dreams it has. The relationships between those who live here, the joys and disappointments they experience and share, as well as the work they do and how they spend their leisure time, all constitute the lifeblood of the city itself.
But a city is not a static unit. Itâs a dynamic and constantly changing environment, adapting to the needs of its residents. And when that city has more than eight million inhabitants who come from every part of the globe, understanding how it works is a daunting challenge. New York Cityâs immense size and scope and the tremendous variety of its people make it impossible to reduce it to a set of empirically verifiable observations and conclusions as one would do with a clearly defined neighborhoodâany attempt to do so cannot succeed. Rather, New York must be viewed as a broad portrait in which the sum is indeed far greater than its parts. And the stories of the cityâs people and how they negotiate their lives are the vehicles that make it possible for us to enter and begin to comprehend this amazing world.
Walking New York City, block by block, brought into sharp focus a reality that I always knew was there but had never really articulated, because it was so much a part of me that I never felt a need to express it. It emerged time and time again as I spoke and interacted with people from every walk of life. To sum it up, New York is a city with a dynamic, diverse, and amazingly rich collection of people and villages whose members display both smalltown values and a high degree of sophistication. This stems from living in a very modern, technologically advanced, and world-class city that is the epitome of the twenty-first century. That is both the major theme and conclusion of this intense and detailed journey to every corner of the five boroughs that constitute the city.
While these qualities reach a high level of expression here, they are by no means unique to New York City. They characterize people in other major cities tooâParis, London, Shanghai, New Delhi, and, in this country, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Boston. While these cities each have their own unique identity, all of them are places infused by new arrivals from everywhere who blend in with longtime residents, who are in turn energized and reshaped by the churning mix resulting from such contacts. This outlook on life and the patterns of behavior that emerge from such exposure are not expressed or realized to the same extent by all New Yorkers, yet they are present in varying degrees among the vast majority of its inhabitants. And this book is devoted to an exploration of that realityâhow it reaches its full potential and how it informs the city as a whole.
Other important findings arose from this project, all of which are summarized in the concluding chapter. These include the critical ways in which gentrification and immigration have changed New York; the permanent impact of 9/11 on the city; the longterm trend toward ethnic assimilation as well as the creation of hybrid identities; and the broad sympathy toward undocumented immigrants.
New York City has never been scientifically studied as a whole by sociologists. In fact, none of the cityâs boroughs has even been investigated as a unit. What we have are many fine studies of communities.1 I once mused aloud about this to a colleague. His response was, âWell, itâs a huge topic. Maybe no one was crazy enough before you did it to walk the whole city.â Perhaps heâs right. You do have to be a little crazy to explore the city as I did, though not so much if you see it as healthy, fun, interesting, and as a challenge. Itâs also a matter of context. No one thinks of runners in New York Cityâs marathon as crazy, because itâs an accepted concept. They run about forty miles a week when training for the marathon, and as Abigail Meisel reports in the New York Times, growing numbers of cyclists are commuting from twenty to forty miles daily from the suburbs. But at least walking in Gotham is seen as an accepted form of activity. When I walked in Los Angeles, I almost never met anyone doing the same. For Angelinos, exercise meant only going to the gym, jogging, or swimming.
But the experience of walking the city is far more than that. Walking is critical to the task because it gets you out there and lets you get to know the city up close. However, you cannot merely walk through a city to know it. You have to stop long enough to absorb whatâs going on around you. And the only way to do that is to immerse yourself in itâspending as much time as possible in the streets; hanging out where others gather; attending meetings, concerts, sporting events, and the like; in short, doing what those who live there do. That is why the ethnographic methodâdirect observation, and sometimes even participation in whatever was going onâbecame the primary approach of this project.
My initial plan was to walk twenty representative streets of the city from end to end and use them as a basis for the book. But I soon realized that there was no way any particular twenty or even one hundred streets could claim to represent a city as large as New York. To do it right I would simply have to walk the entire city, a daunting but eminently worthwhile project. If nothing else, it would be great exercise!
This decision was crucial, for I now had hundreds of examples from what I observed to write about. The many stories and vignettes presented in this book were selected either because they were typical of phenomena I saw over and over again in many parts of the city or because their uniqueness enables us to learn something interesting about the city. When there is so much to choose from, you can pick the very best examples to make your points. Obtaining a general understanding of the entire city ultimately means you wonât be able to present in-depth portraits of every neighborhood, but the benefits of getting a broader picture are well worth that limitation.
I ended up walking about 6,000 miles, the distance between New York City and Los Angeles and back to New York (4,998 miles), and then from New York City to St. Louis. I covered almost every block in Queens, Manhattan, Staten Island, Brooklyn, and the Bronx, including seldom-traversed industrial sections of the city. At the end of each walk I wrote down the number of miles I had traveled, as measured by my Omron pedometer. I averaged about 32 miles a week over four years, starting with Little Neck, Queens, in June 2008 and ending with Greenpoint, Brooklyn, in June 2012. This came to a grand total of 6,048 miles, an average of 1,512 miles a year, 126 miles a month, or 120,960 city blocks (twenty blocks equals one mile). I wore out nine pairs of San Antonio Shoes (SAS), the most comfortable and durable shoes Iâve ever owned. And all of the outer boroughs turned out to be much more interesting than Iâd anticipated.
As I walked, I interviewedâyou could also call them conversations because of their largely spontaneous natureâhundreds of people whom I met, and this too was critical to my efforts. Speaking directly with the cityâs residents was the second critical approach to my undertaking. Hardly anyone refused to talk with me. I asked no one their full names, so as not to invade their privacy, but quite a few people volunteered them anyway, and when they appear in this book, itâs with their permission. Although I have changed a few minor details, most names and places are accurate.
Most of the time I did not tell anyone what I was doing unless they asked, because I wanted their answers to be spontaneous and relaxed. In keeping with that goal, I never began an interview with a standard: âExcuse me, could I ask you some questions about this community?â Instead I would say something like: âHow come youâre dressed like this?â or âIs this neighborhood safe?â or âWhatâs a horse doing in that guyâs backyard?â (That really happened, in Gerritsen Beach, Brooklyn.) Before they knew it (and most of them never did), they were being interviewed.2
I used a tape recorder whenever possible, and when asked why, I told people I wanted to remember what they were saying. Most of them didnât mind, and some were flattered that their words were worth recording. In situations when I thought taping wasnât a good idea, I summarized the conversation by speaking into my recorder as soon it was over. Many of these casual interviews yielded insights on a number of levels. Hereâs a good example of one. I approached a stocky, youngish Honduran man who was waving a plastic orange flag outside a Lower Manhattan garage, signaling drivers that the garage had space for their cars.
âDo you find this job boring?â I asked.
âThis is not my main job.â
âWhatâs your main job?â
âMenten,â he said in his limited English.
âWhatâs that?â
âMenten.â
Figuring I would understand what he meant if I asked him to describe his work, I countered with, âWhat do you do when you do menten?â
âI clean the garage, throw the garbage away, sweep up.â
âYou mean maintenance?â
âYeah, menten.â
Suddenly seized by inspiration, I asked, âCan I wave your flag for a minute? I wanna see what it feels like.â
âAre you okay?â he asked, a worried tone creeping into his voice.
âItâs all right. Iâm a professor.â
Of course, my line of work had nothing to do with my qualifications for this task, but I had learned that many people donât pay close attention to what you say as long as you say something. I would ask someone if I could use their bathroom because I was going to a wedding immediately after our interview, or I would ask if I could make a copy of something because I was leaving for a vacation. It made no sense, but the answer was often yes anyway.
Sure enough, the Honduran man said, âOkay.â
And then a weird thing happened. After waving it for a minute, the flag curled up tightly around the stick and I could no longer wave it. Feeling sheepish, I handed it back to him. I learned from this that the simplest task can be difficult for those who donât know how to execute it.
My reverie was abruptly interrupted when he exclaimed, âI know who you are! Youâre the boss!â
I donât know whether heâd seen the CBS reality program Undercover Boss, where a boss goes among his workers incognito to see how theyâre doing their jobs, but I did take note that he wasnât in the least bit bothered by this possibility. In fact, after I responded enigmatically with, âYou never know,â he simply laughed and said, âBe good, my friend.â
One important lesson from this episode was the realization that we have become a surveillance society. People accept with equanimity, it seems, the idea that others may be spying on them. Independent confirmation of this view came from many other interviews. Another lesson was that New Yorkers from every walk of life are, by and large, a friendly and open lot. That too was substantiated many times over.
I also conducted a number of formal interviews with key leaders in the city, those who headed community boards, religious organizations, and the like. The goal here was to address issues that my walking and impromptu conversations did not fully explain. Of particular interest were my interviews with former mayors Ed Koch, David Dinkins, Rudy Giuliani, and the current mayor, Michael Bloomberg. All were open and forthcoming and spoke about their role in the city and their thoughts about its needs and challenges from the perspectives of both history and hindsight. All of these people are identified by name in the narrative.
Normally sociologists take a more removed view of their work, even though they clearly have feelings and thoughts about it. However, since the research for this book consisted mostly of walking and engaging people personally, I felt it was important to tell what I was thinking as I did so. Thus, at many points I try to explain how I felt as I strolled through the streets. Maybe it would be good if researchers did more of that in general, but thatâs obviously not for me to decide.
This is an exploratory study, a first effort to understand the city. It does not pretend to be exhaustive or comprehensive. My hope is that other researchers will use it as a basis for doing more detailed work on the many aspects and topics introduced here. When youâre the first one on the block, you have to be careful not to assume too much. This is especially true of ethnography, which is a qualitative, often intuitive approach that is most fruitful in providing insights and deeper understanding as opposed to statistical conclusions.
There are many ways to analyze the city of New York. One approach is to use its geographical division into boroughs and neighborhoods and carefully examine each of them. Another approach is to think of the city in terms of categoriesâAsians, whites, New Yorkers, Brooklynites, organizations, small stores, sports, seniors, children. The city can also be evaluated in terms of issuesâimmigration, gentrification, crime, and education. Yet another method is to look at New York City as a patchwork of physical spaces. These include streets, buildings, walls, statues, playgrounds, and memorials. All of these lines of inquiry are employed in this book, because each one helps us to better comprehend this complex metropolis.
The chapter topics were chosen because of their importance and because they were particularly suitable for observation. Immigrants have long been central to New Yorkâs history, as well as that of the United States, and walking gave me many opportunities to meet and engage them. Since the city is made up of many different communities, examining each of them from up close was a natural choice, as was looking at how New Yorkers spend their free time. It was also important to look at the city as a space, because how city dwellers use it speaks volumes for what the city means to them. Understanding the gentrification process was critical because it is the single most effective vehicle for learning about how New York City has been transformed over the last four decades into a vibrant and exciting place, both residentially and commercially. Finally, how people do or do not identify ethnically tells us much about issues that go to the core of who they are and where theyâre heading, both personally and collectively. Throughout the book an effort has been made to consider how the city has changed since it hit rock bottom financially in 1975.
This was clearly a highly labor-intensive project, involving thousands of hours of hard, even grueling, work. Most of the time I walked by myself, with no research assistants to help me. There were times when I was willing to travel one and a half hours by public transportation in order to walk a neighborhood for two hours. You have to grab time whenever you have it. In the fall and the spring, summer and winter, weather permitting, you walk the streets. Then you listen to the tapes and transcribe what you need on rainy or very cold days. You also use that time to read, interview, write, and think. No time can be wasted. Otherwise, you can spend ten years doing a book of this size and still not be finished.
The end gameânamely, writing the bookârequires an ability and willingness to sit in a chair and work for twelve to fourteen hours straight, day in and day out. Single-minded focus is essential, so thereâs no checking your email five times a day. And if youâre sick, you must do everything in your power to get well quickly. My body held up surprisingly well, and I suffered almost no health problems. I daresay that because of th...