CHAPTER ONE
From Germany to Algeria, and Other Historiographies of Resistance
âJust because you were German didnât mean automatically that you were a monster.â
âFred Zinnemann, 19761
âThe weakness of all dictatorships is that they are vast bureaucracies.â
âFrederick Forsyth, The Day of the Jackal (1971), underlined by Fred Zinnemann in his personal copy
Fred Zinnemann was one of many filmmakers to leave an increasingly fascist Europe for Hollywood. He sailed to New York in the autumn of 1929, following close friend and documentary filmmaker GĂŒnther von Fritsch, who had settled in New York City. But, as he recalled, âtwo weeks in New York convinced me that hardly any ârealâ movies were made there; Hollywood, a totally separate world ⊠seemed to be the only answer.â2 He headed west, scouting the Hollywood landscape for a job. Trained as a cameraman at Parisâs new Technical School of Cinema, one of his first moves was to apply for membership in the Hollywood cameramanâs union. Even with the legendary Billy Bitzer (The Birth of a Nation, 1915; Intolerance, 1916) as his sponsor, he was refused admission. Despite forming friendships with European expatriates Berthold and Salka Viertel, and cameramen Joseph Ruttenberg, Gregg Toland, and Floyd Crosby, Zinnemann found it difficult to adjust to Hollywood in the 1930s. He disliked the production systemâs inefficiency and lack of attention to historical detail, and was fired from the set of All Quiet on the Western Front for arguing with one of the assistant directors. He told Sam Goldwyn point blank that Hollywood pictures were âtoo slick.â3 Goldwyn was speechless for once. A few years and several mediocre jobs later, while working as an assistant to William Wyler on Dodsworth (1935), he disagreed with the directorâs camera set-up.4 Wyler was one of the few to find the young upstartâs mixture of youthful enthusiasm and artistic distain amusing.
Zinnemannâs rebellion against the Hollywood system and a career of anonymity led him to accept a job in Mexico as the director of Paul Strandâs new government-funded film. Redes (The Wave, 1934â36) is the story of a fishing community on the Gulf Coast of Mexico which has been exploited for generations by wealthy oligarchs. When one man attempts to organize a strike and is assassinated, the people unite, cutting the ânetsâ of capitalism. Zinnemann spent seven months in Alvarado with Strand, writer Henwar Rodakiewicz, and GĂŒnther von Fritsch, who edited the film. They used local non-professionals in the roles, and cast university student Silvio Hernandez as the heroic strike leader. Though Strandâs interest in making a film about the development of working-class resistance among a group of fishermen was certainly imbued with the aims of Carlos Chavez and Mexicoâs new socialist government,5 his tendency to shoot the film as a series of static images infuriated Zinnemann, who, like Sergei Eisenstein, saw cinematic movement as key to embodying revolutionary change. Despite being a staunch defender of photographic objectivity and its ability to engage with social change, Strandâs fascination with beautiful images often decontextualized them both in front of and behind the camera, and as art historian James Krippner has argued, betrayed his lack of sensitivity to issues of class, ethnicity, and gender.6 Zinnemann would later smooth over their ideological differences, remembering only that he and Strand âdid not get on too well.â But the young director studied the left-wing photographer and his way of maintaining artistic control over the production. Zinnemann had little control over the final cut of Redes, but would remain proud of his involvement with the film. Late in life he was fond of pointing out that a few years after its release, âthe Nazis found the negative and burned it.â7 It was the first but not the last time that one of his films attracted the wrath of a fascist political regime.
When he returned to Hollywood in late December 1934, Zinnemann was still looking for steady work. His resumĂ© must have worried the conservative studio company men: he was associated with the socialist regime in Mexico and was a close friend of one of Hollywoodâs biggest critics, Robert Flaherty. While working for Sam Goldwyn and Sidney Franklin on The Dark Angel (1935), he met Lillian Hellman and Dashiell Hammett, Hollywood writers who maintained their political radicalism while remaining on a studio payroll. Greta Garbo and Salka Viertel pulled strings to get him on the set of George Cukorâs Camille, but after directing Redes, he was in no mood to be anyoneâs assistant again. But a mutual friend of his and Flahertyâs, cinematographer Floyd Crosby, got him an introduction to Jack Chertok of the MGM short department in 1937. Chertok admired Redes, which had just opened to good art-house reviews. He had an eye for training directors; Jules Dassin, Jacques Tourneur, and George Sidney all learned their craft in Chertokâs department. For several years, Zinnemann mastered the shorts system, even winning an Academy Award for That Mothers Might Live (1938), the story of an Austrian doctorâs cure for childbed fever obviously inspired by Zinnemannâs background as the son of a Viennese physician. He made several shorts that tapped into the current industrial trend in history films, such as The Story of Dr. Carver (1938) and The Old South (1940),8 but what he really wanted to do was a feature film about Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata. MGM had recently promoted him to direct Van Heflin and Marsha Hunt in Kid Glove Killer (1942), but Zinnemann, while praising the talents of Heflin and Hunt, saw the contemporary thriller genreâs obvious limitations.9 Combining his familiarity with Mexico and fluent Spanish, expertise in producing economical historical films, and desire to make an anti-fascist film in keeping with Hollywoodâs wartime aims, he wrote to Jack Chertok: âUp till now, the film industry has made a few feeble, though costly efforts in behalf of Pan-American solidarity and friendship. We all know how those efforts have failed, how they were booed off screens down there. More than ever, they made the Latin Americans feel that we have no respect for them, that we know nothing about their way of life, and that we care less. No wonder those pictures backfired. Meanwhile, the Germans keep releasing smoothly made films, successfully flattering the Latin American ego.â10 Zinnemann argued that a film about Zapataâs life âwould be a gesture of respect, provided it is done with dignity and attention to historical truth.â According to Zinnemann, Zapata was a greater hero than the macho military icon Pancho Villa, who had been parodied by Wallace Beery in MGMâs Viva Villa! (1934). Zinnemann would never get to make the Zapata biopic, but his cinematic discovery, Marlon Brando, would star in Elia Kazanâs production several years later (Viva Zapata!, 1952). Instead, MGM producer Pandro S. Berman offered Zinnemann another project which tested his knowledge of Europe, anti-fascism, and heroism. It also connected with the young directorâs interest in historical filmmaking and Hollywoodâs war genre.
But the adaptation of Anna Seghersâs The Seventh Cross was unique as both a historical film and as an anti-Nazi war picture. Arguably, Hollywoodâs films about American variants of fascism date back to Black Legion and They Wonât Forget (both 1937), while the studiosâ early anti-Nazi films, an adaptation of Erich Maria Remarqueâs Three Comrades (MGM, 1938) and Confessions of a Nazi Spy (Warner Bros., 1939), followed many months later.11 With the Nazi occupation of Belgium and Holland, and the French governmentâs collaboration with Nazi Germany in 1940, Hollywoodâs denunciation of fascist Germany became clearer (Escape, MGM, 1940). Yet most Hollywood films about European resistance to fascism focused on the French Resistance (Joan of Paris, Casablanca, Reunion in France, all 1942; Passage to Marseille, 1943). Germans were cast as menacing military types, from Helmut Dantineâs fanatical young pilot (Mrs. Miniver, 1942) to Conrad Veidtâs menacing Major Strasser (Casablanca), who, acknowledging the myth of romantic Paris, slyly asks Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart), âAre you one of those people who canât imagine the Germans in their beloved Paris?â Pan Berman wanted a different approach to the emerging war cycle, and was simultaneously exploring the theme of Eastern anti-fascist resistance histories with old RKO friend Katharine Hepburn, who played the anti-Japanese activist Jade in MGMâs adaptation of Pearl Buckâs historical novel, Dragon Seed (1944).12 But The Seventh Cross was an unusual choice for this production cycle since it was set in Germany, had a prewar historical setting, and its principal Resistance hero was, like Seghers herself, a communist political activist fleeing Nazi internment.13 Spencer Tracy, fresh from his work on The Keeper of the Flame (1943), an adaptation of Conrad Richterâs bestseller about hidden fascism in America, saw Seghersâs work as a way of building on his image as an anti-fascist hero in wartime. Intrigued by Bermanâs description of Zinnemann, he asked to meet the young director. Their professional chemistry was immediate, and the men became good friends.
Zinnemann, thrilled with the prospect of working with MGMâs most revered star, read Helen Deutschâs script with interest.14 Seghers had employed several recurring first-person voices throughout the novel. Anonymous Westhofen camp prisoners narrate German history and contextualize the escape, George thinks or mutters to himself throughout the massive manhunt, and the voice of Resistance leader Ernst Wallau, who is tortured to death after being recaptured, urges George to persevere in his escape.15 But for Deutsch and later Zinnemann, Wallauâs voice-over, heard even from the grave, became the central feature accompanying Georgeâs escape and his political reawakening in the final scenes. Berman, Zinnemann, and Deutsch worried about introducing American audiences to the idea of German resistance to fascism in the 1930s, and were consequently preoccupied with the opening, explanatory voice-over. Deutschâs early scripts expand and contract Wallauâs narration; at one point, the script contained multiple versions of the first sixteen pages of narration, and later the narration was considered important enough to merit a separate script composed entirely of the voice-over excerpts.16 Seghers would later write to Zinnemann saying that she felt Wallauâs voice-overs intruded too much in the narrative and were excessive,17 yet for Deutsch and for Zinnemann, this excess served a historical purpose. Wallau functioned as a crucial historical voice for a vanished group of Germans. Georgeâs tendency to be silent in the opening sequences contrasts with both Wallauâs voice and Georgeâs growing articulateness and political awareness in the second half.
The voice-over developed from the 1930s when it was occasionally used in lieu of a superimposed text foreword in historical films. Both the historical gangster smash-hit The Roaring Twenties (1939) and the George M. Cohan biopic Yankee Doodle Dandy (1942) used this form of narration in different ways: to link the subject matter to contemporary reportage and to personalize histories with the voice of the protagonist.18 A few years later, film noir would also tend toward voice-over narration, learning from Hitchcockâs Rebecca (1940). Voice-over narration would briefly dominate production of noir, from Double Indemnity, Murder, My Sweet, and Laura (all 1944) to The Locket (1946), Dark Passage (1947), Out of the Past (1947), and Sunset Boulevard (1950). All of these noirs were focused on the protagonistsâ harrowing past lives and complicated the genreâs allegedly contemporary contexts. The association between voice-over narration, fraught histories, and claustrophobic personal disaster also links these later noirs with the motifs of The Seventh Cross.19 Yet The Seventh Crossâs reliance upon voice-over instead of the more conventional text superimpositions embodied the anti-fascist/anti-Nazi movementâs own vulnerability and marginality in a world where official histories and documents were easily corrupted for the purposes of political propaganda. As historian Margaret Collins Weitz has pointed out, âUnderground movements do not leave written records.â20 Documents found by Nazis or fascist militia were a death sentence. In The Seventh Cross, oral history recovers the narrative of early anti-fascist resistance in Germanyâa narrative that, like its protagonists, is all but extinct.
The film begins with what Deutsch described as Wallauâs âcalm, deliberate, dispassionateâ voice, narrating a story almost unknown to the historical records but crucial to remember: âWhen all the stories have been told, the great stories and the little onesâthe tragedies and the melodramasâwhen all the stories of what happened in Europe have been told, as of course they never can be, the seventh cross will be remembered as the story of a few little people who proved there is something in the human soul which sets men above the animals and beyond them.â Wallau also provides the necessary historical background: âIt happened in Germany in the fall of the year 1936 ⊠the wars and aggressions had not yet begun, but the concentration camps were filledâthe Germans were still purging their own country of rebelsâpurging their nation of the last traces of human decency.â21 Many of Seghersâs prisoners were incarcerated members of the once flourishing Communist Party (the KPD), the Nazi Partyâs main radical opponent in the late 1920s and 1930s (as opposed to the more established German Socialist Party, the SPD). In March 1933, the Nazis began arresting party members, sending thousands of them to torture and death in the newly created Dachau concentration camp. Until his arrest, George Heisler was one of the partyâs strongest adherents, and was widely known as a trained demonstrator and agitator. Wallau was his teacher. Yet Seghers was careful not to make her communist persuasions and those of her hero too apparent.22 There were references to former party officials and demonstrations in the novel, b...