![]()
BUSINESS
ACUMEN
âKnowledge has to be improved, challenged, and
increased constantly, or it vanishes.â
âPETER DRUCKER
Business acumen is the collective repository of all your business knowledge and experiences. It serves as the source of your ability to assess a given situation, coalesce a sea of information, and chart a navigable way forward. In other words, business acumen is what an executive point of view derives from.
Itâs a mistake to think an effective executive point of view can come from raw intelligence alone. Knowledge accumulated over time, combined with intelligence, can be developed into the ability to make sense of dynamic situations and translate that understanding into actionable perspectives.
A leader has to be able to think strategically and be able to understand economic, market, financial, and operational dynamics in varying contexts to know what needs to be done in any situation that may arise.
Business acumen comes from experienced-based learningâmaking decisions and taking actions in different situations, challenges, and contextsâbut it also comes from knowledge-based learning developed through reading, thinking, and understanding.
Developing exceptional business acumen requires years of commitment to learning, applying, failing, and adapting. Through this process, a credible and sought-after executive point of view is developed. Itâs easy to spot someone who has it.
When I was part of a large national organization during a time of considerable challenges for our industry, one member of the executive team consistently demonstrated his exceptional business acumen. He improved employee morale and gave us all a strong sense that we would be successful, no matter what obstacles came our way. I remember one departmental all-hands meeting in which he presented his executive point of view on how we were going to move forward as a company. He was able to clearly articulate both what was similar and what was different about the current challenges relative to challenges faced historically and how our enterprise strategy was evolving as a result. Moreover, he outlined his view on which challenges were systemic and which were cyclical, and how we were evolving our operating model and financial strategy to adapt to our new environment. We all left the meeting energized and excited.
We think about business acumen as a function of five fundamentals:
- Strategic thinking
- Economic acumen
- Financial acumen
- Operational acumen
- Market orientation
STRATEGIC THINKING
If the purpose of a business is to profitably create value for customers, then strategy is about the long-term choices that articulate how this is accomplished. Michael Porter, in his book Competitive Strategy, frames strategy as âdeliberately choosing a different set of activities to deliver unique value.â In their book Playing to Win, authors A. G. Lafley and Robert Martin go a step further and describe strategy as âan integrated set of five choices: a winning aspiration, where to play, how to win, core capabilities, and management systems.â
Lafley and Martin define the meaning of a winning aspiration as the purpose and vision of your enterpriseâitâs who you are and what you stand for. Where to play tells you where your enterprise will competeâits geographies, its product categories, consumer segments, channels, and vertical stages of production. How to win defines your unique value proposition and the competitive advantage your enterprise will pursue. Core capabilities are what you need to excel given the choices being made, and management systems are the practices the management team implements to govern execution of the strategy.
Alan Mulally, one of Americaâs most effective turnaround CEOs, outlines his leadership philosophy in his straightforward âWorking Together Principles and Practices.â One principle that is cited often is âcompelling vision, comprehensive strategy, relentless implementation.â Mulally demonstrates the power of going through the process of establishing a powerful vision and developing a strategy that serves as a road map outlining how the vision will be achieved; the vision and strategy give stakeholders a big-picture perspective and help them understand the interconnectedness of the enterprise. Aligning the organization around a comprehensive strategy was one of the key factors that enabled Mulally to lead Ford through a transformation that turned years of significant operating losses into sustained profitabilityâall the while navigating the Great Recession.
Moreover, alignment around clear strategic choices serves as the set of guardrails and filters through which all subsequent decisions are made. It aligns operational priorities, initiatives, and projects in a consistent, focused way. When an organizationâs decision-making, initiatives, and projects seem random and disparate, itâs a clear indication that a cohesive strategy may not exist.
When we first implemented true enterprise vision-setting and strategy development, the organization we were with had been operating in pure execution mode. The executive team had been focused on âfire drillsâ and the immediate tasks at hand specific to their areas. This siloed operating model was leaving a lot of potential on the table. As finance leaders, we instituted a new business planning process that started with an annual strategy offsite to align the organization around a focused strategy. The attendees included not only our executive team, but all our key enterprise leaders as well. During the offsite, we set an enterprise vision, established long-term performance goals, and aligned around key strategic choices. Not only did working together in this way energize the group, but it also broke down all the preexisting departmental silos. To communicate our new strategy throughout the organization, we used posters and wallet-sized cards that articulated our vision, performance goals, and values, and distilled our strategic choices into a concise four-point plan that served as the guardrail for all subsequent planning decisions. The feedback from employees was overwhelmingly positive, and the entire executive team was aligned with the way forwardâ and their refreshed priorities reflected it.
ECONOMIC ACUMEN
If accounting is the language of business, economics is the framework of business, particularly in terms of managerial decision-making. Although many definitions of economics exist, Michael Bayeâs definition of economics as âthe science of making decisions in the presence of scarce resourcesâ is one of the more intuitive. More specifically, in Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, he defines managerial economics as âthe study of how to direct scarce resources in the way that most efficiently achieves a managerial goal.â Anyone whoâs gone through a corporate annual expense budgeting process would likely agree that the process of directing scarce resources to achieve company goals and objectives happens every year. Because consolidated expense budgets, more often than not, exceed what the business can afford, business unit and functional leaders have to evaluate the costs and benefits of their budget line items and make organizational trade-offs. When stakeholders are aligned and focused on the same outcomes, the process works effectively to prioritize where dollars are allocated.
In his book Executive Economics, Shlomo Maital explains, âBusiness decisions are built on three pillarsâcost, value, and price,â and âthe job of managers is to build and run businesses by selling goods and services that provide value at a reasonable price for their customers at an acceptable cost to the business. If managers create more value at lower cost than their competitors, their businesses prosper and profit.â
Cost, value, and pricing decisions can be considerably improved in any enterprise with the application of a few straightforward foundational principles of economics. Here are a few examples:
SUPPLY AND DEMAND
One of the most foundational decisions youâll have to make as a business manager is how much of a given product or service to supply to a market. If you supply too much relative to market demand, your business will become inefficient. It will also be less profitable due to the associated costs and the need to reduce prices. If you supply too little relative to market demand, your business will be forced to forego sales opportunities, and you will risk upsetting your customers.
When Fordâs CEO Alan Mulally outlined his One Ford plan to turn around the struggling business in 2006, his first pillar was to âaggressively restructure to operate profitably at the current demand and changing model mix.â1 Put simply, he wanted to make enough cars to satisfy demand but not fill dealersâ lots with months of excess inventory. Additionally, a leader must understand demand elasticity when making pricing decisions. For example, if you lower prices, does the increase in volume provide enough benefit to offset the lost sales dollars from the lower prices?
ECONOMIC VS. ACCOUNTING PROFIT
When you are confronted with the need to decide whether to pursue a specific initiative, it may seem appealing to rely on simple accounting profit. But economic profit considers the implicit opportunity costs that can often be overlooked. Looking at decisions through the lens of economic profit and opportunity costs will lead to outcomes that do a better job of allocating your resources to the opportunities with the most efficient rates of return.
I remember one conversation with a key business leader. We were reviewing our historical financial statements, and he seemed surprisingly accepting of single-digit net profitability. In the context of our industry, which had been facing considerable challenges, I generally understood why he was satisfied with the fact that we were still, at the very least, making money. But then I explained to him that if we simply sold all the assets on our balance sheet and reinvested those proceeds in the stock market (which arguably would be less risky than operating as a going concern in our industry), weâd more than double the profit dollars we were currently generating. This was an oversimplified scenario, but he immediately got the point that, given our invested capital and the riskiness of our business, we needed to generate more profitability to justify staying in the business. In other words, that simple example got him thinking about opportunity costs and economic profit, without me having to brush the dust off my economics textbooks.
INCENTIVES
The ability to structure incentive programs around specific desired outcomes is one of the most critical managerial skills a leader might be called upon to use. Incentives considerably influence what your employees are working on and how hard they are working. When you, as a manager, combine the right goals, objectives, and incentives, work will get done effectively and efficiently.
When we wanted to improve our inventory management at a retailer I was working for, our first point of focus was to create the right incentive compensation program within our merchandising organization. Because our business had both high-turn, low-margin products and low-turn, high-margin products, we established an incentive compensation program using Gross Margin Return on Inventory as the primary bonus measure. For non-retailers, GMROI is a metric that levels the playing field across product categories with different economics. In other words, GMROI targets can be achieved by managing sales and inventory levels, gross margin, or a combination of both. Not surprisingly, once we instituted this change and set product GMROI goals, our buyers for our low-margin product categories started managing inventory levels much more strictly and began to hit their GMROI targets. This freed up millions of dollars of working capital that had been tied up in inventory, which made a big difference for our business.
MARGINAL ANALYSIS
One key component youâll want to consider when constructing a business case is marginal analysis. This involves evaluating the trade-offs in terms of the incremental benefit vs. the incremental costs of a decision.
For example, while working for a large organization, I led a team that evaluated the efficacy of our customer loyalty program. The program had become increasingly large and expensive, and we wanted to ensure that it was opti...