Chapter 1
Manitoba Resurrection
strings of little words
Rule #1
Try not to use too many strings of little words because they really do add a lot of unnecessary clutter to your sentences.
Have you ever met someone who rants on and on and on but never says anything? Imagine what itās like to grade a paper that does the same thing. I can assure you, your professor would rather scrub toilets than read an essay that chatters like a magpie.
In rule #1, I used a strong word: clutter. But because it straggles behind a string of little words, itās invisible.
Strings are inventories of abstraction: try not to use too many; they really do add a lot. None of these words stirs the sensesāthe reader canāt see them or hear them, so she must work harder to unpack the sentence.
To improve the sentence, I can say something like this: Strings of little words clutter your sentences. Now the two interesting words come into view: strings and clutter.
Why, you ask, is cutting out a few little words such a big deal? Think about it. If you cut two words from every sentence of a ten-page essay, you eliminate about 250 excessesāand make more room for the content-rich words and phrases that intoxicate your professors.
Sample Reading
There is a tiny little wood frog that lives deep in the woods of Manitoba. The truth is, this little frog doesnāt really have any special attributes that would attract us to it, except for one small thing. Each spring, unbelievably, it is said to be resurrected from the dead. In the winter, when the outside temperatures drop and fall to below freezing, it doesnāt choose to bury itself in the mud and it doesnāt settle beneath the ice on the bottom of a frozen lake. Instead of this, it pretty much freezes to death in a hole in the ground. The wood frogās heartbeat and breathing slow down and after a period of time come to a stop. The water in its body very slowly crystallizes, and around 65 percent of it turns into ice. Its body temperature drops to a chilly ā1 °C to ā6 °C, and the frog becomes as hard and fragile as a piece of glass. Then, when the winter begins its long process of thawing out, the frog too begins to thawābut it thaws from the inside out, not from the outside in, as a lot of people would expect.
My Corrections
Step 1
I first want to cut out the unnecessary words. Reread the first two sentences, and pay attention to the words in bold.
I can improve these sentences by cutting the following words:
⢠tinyāmeans the same thing as little
⢠the truth isāredundant: the context indicates that I am relating facts, not fiction
⢠reallyāis this word really necessary?
⢠that would attract us to itāstates the obvious; special attributes typically attract our attention
⢠unbelievably, it is said to beādilutes the most important idea: resurrection from the dead
The sentences now read like this:
Before I move on, I want to ensure that the sentences are clear; sometimes when you cut out extra words, errors pop up out of nowhere. In the example above, I deleted the phrase that would attract us to it, but I forgot to insert a comma after special attributes.
Step 2
Next, Iāll underline the content-rich wordsāthose that convey meaningāto see if Iāve overlooked any unnecessary little words.
If I juggle a few things around, Iāll have an impressive sentence:
Notice that I cut out empty words like there, that, and this. I used the sensory words deep and dead to empower the beginning and end of the sentence, and I inserted a colon (:) to highlight the frogās defining feature: its resurrection from the dead.
The original word count in step 1 is 50; the final word count is 27. The rewrite says the same thing more conciselyāand, I think, more powerfully.
Step 3
Read the next few sentences of the paragraph.