SUPPOSE YOU ARE building a road on a mountainside leading to the site for your new cabin. You have worked for months clearing sagebrush and aspen trees. Youâve moved rocks and filled in roadbed through the exhausting heat, the raging downpours, even early snow. Youâve pushed forward, working from your best understanding of the surveyorâs plans. Your road winds over a dusty hill, cuts through the trees, moves along a rocky ridge, and thenâyou find yourself looking down from the edge of a cliff.
Fake work looks and feels like that. The building of the road was purposeful. Your effort was admirable. The blood, sweat, and tears you poured into the project were real and your commitment was profound. But none of that really matters! You are still left with a road to nowhere.
So many of us have dedicated weekends and long nights to a project, proposal, or presentation that ended up being canceled, ignored, or dismissedâessentially roads to nowhereâand see all oneâs efforts lead to nothing. That is the road to fake workâwork that, at the end of long days, weeks, months, or even years, just seems to drop off a cliff.
What Is Real Work and What Is Fake Work?
We spend more than half our lives and a vast percentage of our waking hours going to work, being at work, leaving work, and thinking about workâeven when weâre not at work. What we sometimes miss, when we think about work, is outcomes.
Real work, as we define it, is work that is critical and aligned to the key goals and strategies of an organizationâany organization, corporation, nonprofit company, government agency, church, school, or family. It is work that is essential for the organizationâs short-term and long-term survival.
Fake work, on the other hand, is effort under the illusion of value. Fake work is work that is not targeting or aligned with the strategies and goals of the company. Fake work is what happens when people lose sight of their personal or company goalsâwhether itâs increasing sales, opening new offices, or designing new productsâand what, amid all the work being done, theyâre actually doing to achieve those goals. Prime examples of fake workâwhich drains both the individual and the companyâare meaningless paperwork, time-wasting meetings, empty training initiatives, or countless other activities that do nothing to move us toward our objectives, either as individuals or as companies.
Often it is easy to identify fake work, simply because it is so blatantly obvious and stupid. One manager, Ricky, describes one such situation:
Other times, fake work can be hard, dreadfully hard, to detect, as we will explore in the following chapters. As the next story illustrates, the line between real work and fake work can be thin, but very costly and time-consuming.
ENGINEERING VS. REPORTING
- Problems that had to be solved
- Recommendations that managers or others needed to act on to solve the problems
- Conclusions from projects. Something final of importance.
- Problems found on ______ project
- Recommendations for action
- Conclusions regarding ______ project
As challenging as it sometimes is to answer, can you afford not to ask yourself the critical question: Am I doing fake work? And once youâve asked yourself if youâve fallen into the fake-work trap, other important questions will arise: Are my coworkers doing fake work? Where does fake work begin, and who has the ability to control it? How do leaders affect fake work? How can work teams control the value of their work? What about individuals? Throughout this book, we hope to illuminate these questions and offer meaningful answers. In the process, we will challenge readers to ask the right questions, to understand the issues, and to find their way back from the road to nowhere.
The Changing Nature of Work
Go to a bar, restaurant, hotel, or sporting event on any given night, and youâll find people checking their work voice mail and reading work-related e-mail on their BlackBerrys or iPhones; youâll see conference calls happening on commuter trains at 6 a.m.; and in the airport youâll see people who routinely travel to a faraway city during the day for work and return home at ten p.m., often multiple nights a week. As a culture, weâre defined by our work, and many of us are consumed by doing our jobs all the time. Weâre working harder and faster than ever before, and weâre doing it on a 24/7 schedule.
But our research points up a painful fact: All too often the incredibly hard work spent on a project or task is not what needs to be done to meet company goals: It is fake work. The intent is to accomplish good work. The intent is to be responsible. The intent is to be proud of our work. But can you be working hard, with good intentions, with amazing effort, and still be doing fake work? Sadly, yes, and way too often. Much of the reason for this grim reality is found in the fact that work has changed. In fact, the very nature of how we see and measure work has shifted dramatically in a very short time, and we must ensure that we understand real work and fake work in the context of these changes. Plenty has been written about the shift from products to services, from manufacturing to knowledge and information workers, from low use of technology to high use. And each of these shifts makes a huge difference in how we perceive work.
The following is a story shared by Collin, the CEO of a technology consulting firm, in which he takes a mental journey as he walks through his work environment and queries the activities heâs observing.
Collinâs ponderings explore the changing nature of work and point to the fact that it is sometimes hard to know if work is being done at allâbecause banging on the computer or searching the Web has as much potential to be fake work as real. The shift challenges the way we think about and how we see, understand, and measure the effectiveness and relevance of work. Activity alone does not define workâs value. In a manufacturing environment, drilling holes and placing bolts through the holes defines the work, making work and intent easy to connect. Baling hay in a field is easy to see as real work; farmhands are either baling or theyâre not.
Collin wonât be able to see whether his company is on track unless he acquires a better understanding of the actual work his employees need to be doing and unless he improves his evaluation skills. Collin is wondering if he has done his jobâdefining and clarifying the critical elements of his employeesâ work. He also wonders if he even knows what those elements are. So if he doubts himself, he has a right to wonder whether others in his company are doing what they need to be doing.
As companies employ more and more remote workers, people working at staggered hours, and people working on research and less product-related work, our view of work must be adjusted. The models for effective management, the measures of success, and our ideas about value hav...