FOUR HUNDRED YEARS AGO the sun, sinking into the water meadows west of the Hudson, left Manhattan a dark outpost in the wilderness, lit only by candle and lamp flames, here and there feebly visible through shutters clapped to at dusk. Stranded and lonely New Amsterdam was, 3,000 miles from grandmother Europe and mother Amsterdam, and preternaturally silent it often was. But calm, peaceful, sunk in torpid sleepânever. Early Manhattanâs nights were from the beginning a drama of outsized characters. Insider bearded outsider, neighbor crossed paths with neighbor, and meetings might end in farce, melodrama, love, tragedy, or all at once. The triangle of narrowing island was tiny, but its life immense, striking the spark that has illuminated the New York night ever sinceâbringing, as day often forbids, stranger into the company of stranger and transforming, into love or hatred, the relations between friend and friend.
In 17th-century New Amsterdam the European settlers strove to dominate a borderless territory whose scale they didnât realize and wouldnât have been able to comprehend if they were aware of it. Outside their makeshift village, the Indiansâthe rightful occupants by any fair measureâstill gathered in seasonal encampments in the woods and along the shores, surrounding the presumptuous little Dutch fort with its straggle of houses. European and native had, in the colonyâs earliest decades, locked into an expedient but also distrustful interdependence. They daily needed, sometimes loved, often resented, fought, or murdered, and almost always misunderstood each other.
But during the winter and early spring of 1643 their relations spilled across the brink of catastrophe. Everyone was feeling the strainâparticularly the two men who, late on the evening of Monday, April 6, 1643, sat in the pocket-sized Wooden Horse tavern, a warm beacon in an ocean of darkness. The muddy village lanes were unlit, and would remain so for half a century more, when feeble candle lanterns appeared, by city ordinance, to be hung from every seventh house on moonless nights. There would be no formally designated Town Hall until 1653, ten years in the future. Apart from the Schout Fischalâpart sheriff, part prosecutorâand his minions, often as riotous as the drunks and thieves they hounded, no organized force patrolled the streets overnight until the first official night watch went on duty in 1658. There were no hospitals until 1660.
It was well past ten oâclock, the townâs widely flouted bar closing hour. But alcohol was New Amsterdamâs fuel, the volatile elixir that alternately glued it together and blew it apart. It was the colonyâs steadiest source of income, and trade in it was so profitable that it had early on become a nuisance: a 1648 ordinance complained that âone full fourth of the City of New Amsterdam has been turned into taverns for the sale of brandy, tobacco and beer.â Any night, all night, even if the bars were shut, you could buy bootleg liquor from boats that quietly plied the rivers, selling to settlers and Indians alike: a 1656 law decried the rampant trade in alcohol along the riverbanks by âyachts, barks, scows, ships and canoes, going up and down.â
Philip Geraerdy, the tavernkeeper, looked on uneasily as Jan Jansen Damen got drunker and drunker. The Wooden Horse, set in its own small yard, was eighteen feet by 25, with a single door, one window, and a thatched roof. Probably, like most Dutch taverns of the era, it had a locking cabinet for the drinks, and a rack of the clay pipes that were constant companions, both in business and pleasure.* By the 1640s the Wooden Horse had established itself as a rendezvous for soldiers from the garrison, but also attracted officials of the Dutch West India Company and prosperous landholders who owned the bouweries, or farms (perhaps Damen favored the place because his wife, Adrienne Cuville, was, like Geraerdy, French by birth).
Modest though his establishment was, Geraerdy was a forefather of New York nightlife. Born Philippe GĂ©rard in France, he had come to the colony with his wife, Marie, sometime before 1639. In 1641 he built his tavern on the northeast corner of todayâs Stone and Whitehall Streets. The name seems to have been a wry joke: as a soldier with the garrison Geraerdy had been sentenced to ride the wooden horseâa painful punishment in which the victim straddled two boards nailed together to form a sharp wedge that rested on four legs. A wooden horseâs head adorned the front, and a tail the rear. Geraerdy rode with a pitcher in one hand and a sword in the other, probably to signify that heâd been shirking military duty by running a bar as a sideline.
Geraerdyâs customer, Jan Jansen Damen, was 38 years old. Born in 1605, heâd emigrated from Holland to Albany around 1631, then resettled in New Amsterdam, where he quickly ingratiated himself with the colonyâs mercurial governor, Willem Kieft. By the late 1630s Damen was wheeling and dealing to combine several parcels of land just north of todayâs Wall Street into a farmstead that eventually stretched from the Hudson to the East River and included the ground on which Trinity Church now stands. Damen appears often in town records as a precipitator of both business deals and brawls, a quarrelsome and forbidding personage, respected for his business acumen (or at least his money) but held at armâs length because of his bad temper, drunkenness, and occasional violence.
In one imbroglio over money at his house he once struck his stepdaughter, Christina, threw her outdoors, whipped out a knife, raked it down her skirt, tore off her cap, and began pummeling her with his fists. Her husband, Dirck Holgerson, threw a pewter can at Damenâs head to defend her. Damen lunged at him with the knife, and Holgerson prevailed over this berserk father-in-law only by stunning him with a blow on the head from a post picked up in the yard.
Such was the not-to-be-trifled-with figure who now sat in the Wooden Horse. He had stayed on long past closing time and drunk hard before he rose to leave. By then Geraerdy was alarmed enough to quietly slip his customerâs sword out of its scabbard, andâsometime between midnight and one oâclock in the early morning of Tuesday, April 7, 1643âto escort him home. The neighborhood was, as always, awash in the sound of Manhattanâs two great rivers, restlessly sweeping and eddying with their tides and currents. The Heerewegh was the main thoroughfare, up which Damen and Geraerdy were about to take perhaps the first midnight walk recorded in the history of the street later renamed Broadway by the English. In 1643 it was unpaved but began near where it does today, in a wide space before the Fortâroughly todayâs Bowling Green. In the 1640s, before a long-running series of landfill projects shouldered the rivers back, there was no Battery; the East River was 600 feet and the Hudson 1,200 feet closer to todayâs Bowling Green. Nothing in New Amsterdam could compete with the night sky or the water ceaselessly lapping at the land. Within a few hundred feet north of the Fort buildings began to thin, giving way to a cemetery along the Hudson, then gardens and vacant land, then another cemetery. The countryside, dotted with swamps and a refuge for hostile Indians, was beautiful by day but frightening at night.
Once Geraerdy and Damen had left the tavern, they probably walked toward the Fortâa wooden paling protected by a much trodden and deteriorating earthen berm, which the town was only now beginning to face with stone. Inside, along with the flagpole, there was a new stone church, just visible over the battlements. Then they turned right on todayâs Whitehall Street, heading north; the West India Companyâs windmill came into view, standing motionless at night, alongside the Hudson and just beyond the northwest bastion of the Fort. Taking a second right onto the Heerewegh, they now passed two more taverns on the left, the soldier-friendly establishments of Peter Cock and Martin Crugier. Then housesâmere cottages, most of them, at this hour, shuttered, dark, dead to the world, and surrounded by sizable gardens, even small orchards.
Damen lived just a quarter mileâs up-island walk from the White Horse, but at night the muddy Heerewegh was frightening, haunted by drunks, the occasional insomniac pig, and Indians, whom Damen had good and very personal reasons to fear. The town was quiet, but not without hints of threat, even before the current tension between the Dutch and the Indians. Whoring sailors were not supposed to be abroad, but a 1638 law ordering them to return to their ships by sundown had been widely ignored. Town dwellers, seeking firewood or building materials, were known to steal out after nightfall to tear down the wooden fences that guarded outlying pastures and farm plots.
Damen and Geraerdy passed the West India Companyâs gardens, today the south graveyard of Trinity Church. Just beyond Wall Streetânot yet laid out and still without the wall it was named forâthey came to Damenâs farm. At todayâs Pine Street, where the ground rose slightly, they turned right down a dirt lane. On their right was Damenâs house* with its orchard and kitchen gardens. The land was still leased and much of it remained uncultivated, but Damen would own it outright the following year. Retracing their steps today, from the Transit Authority office building, 2 Broadway (whose saturnine bulk hunkers over any remaining buried traces of the Wooden Horse), the walk takes only fifteen minutes.
Then as now the after hours were, as Geraerdy seems to have sensed, the time for passions to flare out. As they approached Damenâs house, they found it dark, locked, silent. Prolonged pounding, however, finally roused Dirck, Damenâs servant (the records arenât clear as to whether this was the same man as his son-in-law), who suddenly jerked open the door and, pistol in hand, announced that he meant to kill Damen on the spot. A scuffle ensued, with Dirck brandishing the gun and the soused Damen lunging at him with his empty scabbard. Geraerdy held Dirck off with Damenâs sword, while the enraged burgher stormed inside and emerged with a knife, whichâin the pitch darknessâhe sliced by mistake down Geraerdyâs back, carving a gash underneath his right shoulder blade.
What Happened at Midnight:
February 25, 1643
Geraerdy survived (though his wound required attention from Dr. Hans Kierstede, New Amsterdamâs leading surgeon). Geraerdy insisted he bore Damen no grudge. But this goodwill put him in a minority: Damen had become a pariah, one of the most hated men in the colony, and Dirckâs sudden assault on his master was not anomalous. For all New Amsterdam was on edge in the aftermath of a far more harrowing night a few weeks earlier, in which Damen had been deeply involved. Now neighbor was snarling at neighbor, and the leading clergyman, Dominie (i.e., pastor) Everardus Bogardus, was denouncing Kieft, the increasingly hated governor. The tension broke out everywhere: by day in the restrained but still palpable agitation of the colonyâs official records, and by night in tavern brawls.
New Yorkâs reputation both for lawlessness, and for its clash of races, ethnicities, languages, and classes, is often traced back to the 1800s. But the colony had been contentious from the beginning, founded by the Dutch West India Company not as a utopian experiment but as pure business, unsoftened by sentiment. The settlers were as polyglot and combative as the New Yorkers of later eras: Governor Kieft told the Jesuit missionary Isaac Jogues, visiting in 1643, that among them they spoke eighteen different languages. The company was authoritarian in spirit, but the three monthsâ arduous sail across the Atlantic put it out of touch with day-to-day events. Also, while the fur trade was still in its infancy, the company had kept New Amsterdam afloat by selling wine, beer, and distilled liquor, and the colony acquired a reputation for dissoluteness: one agent wrote back to Amsterdam in September 1626 complaining that the inhabitants, from Peter Minuit down to the farmers and laborers, âdraw their rations and pay in return for doing almost nothing, without examining their conscience or considering their bounden duty and what they promised to do upon their engagement.â
But the darkest episodes of these early years rose not from tensions within the immigrant populace, but from the tense bond, half dependence and half suspicion, that had formed between the settlers and the much larger native population of Indiansâa primordial instance of the uneasy dance of insider and outsider that would give the city night its rhythm. The tension could be rich and productive, but in Dutch Manhattan, it exploded in one of the most violent and macabre nights in New York history. Damen, up to his neck in the catastrophe, tried to dissociate himself from it but fooled no one.
Wednesday evening, February 25, 1643, began with a seemingly innocent supper party hosted by Kieft at his mansion in the Fort. As described by a later visitor, its large wood-paneled hall was decorated by 300 polished blunderbusses. In the study a collection of books vied with still more weaponry: âpistolls set in Rondellos,âŠalso sundry Indian weapons, an Indian Stone hatchette, an ax, a Buckler, a poleax,â and âsome Scimitars very pretty to behold.â* Among Kieftâs guests in these gloomy chambers, two were worth remarking. One was Adrienne Cuville, Damenâs wife (New Amsterdam women often kept their maiden names). The other was David de Vries, the governorâs advisor, who, despite misgivings about his employer, seems not to have known what was afoot. Perhaps it was some sinister edge in Kieftâs or Cuvilleâs manner that unsettled him. âI remained that night at the Governorâs sitting up,â de Vries later remembered.
Indeed it was a night of atrocities, far worse than de Vries probably imagined at the time because it was no impulsive outburst but a cold-blooded plot, first laid in January or February, when Kieft and his co-conspirators had secretly authorized a massacre of Wiechquaesgeck and Tappan Indians. By the time the butchery was over, about 120 Indian men, women, and children had been slaughtered, about 40 at Corlaerâs Hook (two miles beyond Damenâs house), and 80 at Pavonia, across the Hudson in New Jersey. After midnight, the raiders began returning to the Fort flaunting their trophies: wounded, sometimes atrociously mutilated captives and a cargo of severed heads. De Vries may have been struck to the quick by this spectacle. But Adrienne Cuville was delightedâas became clear when, after the seven years it took for news of the slaughter to reach Amsterdam and be acted on, the Dutch West India Company dispatched a sternly worded interrogatory to Cuville, insisting that she respond under oath. Was it true, the dispatch demanded, that âwhen the heads of certain slain Indians were brought to the Manhattans,â Cuville rushed out to âexult over the circumstance, and with her feet kick the heads which were brought in?â
Other records differ as to whether she kicked just one head or many, but even hers was not the direst of the nightâs atrocities. âInfants,â de Vries reported, âwere torn from their motherâs breasts, and hacked to pieces in the presence of the parents, and the pieces were thrown into the fire and in the water, and other sucklings, being bound to small boards were cut, stuck, and pierced and miserably massacred in a manner to move a heart of stone.â The next morning âsome came to our people in the country with their hands, some with their legs cut off and some holding their entrails in their arms, and others had such horrible cuts and gashes that worse than they were could never happen.â
Many if not most of the settlers had no inkling of the Kieft conspiracy and were appalled by the next morningâs grisly news. Kieft took the brunt of their anger: people began remembering his mysterious behavior in the weeks leading up to the incident. De Vries noted that on Tuesday, February 24, the day before the massacre, âthe GovernorâŠbegan to state his intentions, that he had a mind to wipe the mouths of the savages.â But, as Adrienne Cuvilleâs behavior at the Fort hints, Damen too was part of the conspiracy. So were several other owners of outlying farms, notably including Cornelis Van Tienhoven, who was both Damenâs neighbor to the northeast and a relative: Van Tienhovenâs wife, Rachel, was Adrienne Cuvilleâs daughter by an earlier marriage.
Kieft had been spoiling for an attack, and apparently found a ready ear in landholders, like Damen and Van Tienhoven, who felt particularly vulnerable to Indian raids. This is suggested by another pointed question among the Dutch West India Companyâs written interrogatories, this one directed to Van Tienhoven, and asking about an entertainment given at Damenâs house shortly before the February massacre. âWas not a mysterious toast dr[u]nk at an entertainment at the house of Jan Damen, by some few, though not by all then present, without the major part having been aware what it meant?âŠWhat was this mysterious toast and what was its purport?â Kieft proposed the toast, and while its exact words have been lost it seems to have been a coded permission to proceed to those in the knowâincluding Damen and Van Tienhoven. The company further demanded, âwhat relationship exists between him, [Van] Tienhoven, and Jan Damen?â Evidently, this and follow-up questions imply Damen and several other plotters, having heard the toast, had then asked Van Tienhoven to draw up a petition to Kieft, seeking his permission to attack the Indians.
Nobody else at the gathering was to know exactly what was afoot until the early morning hours of Thursday, February 26, and when the plotters began hauling trunks and heads and body parts into the Fort. Outrage was the common response. The Eight Men, an elected board of advisors to Kieft, had included Damen. But his seven fellow councilors were so outraged by his involvement in the massacre that they refused to sit with him at a meeting (he protested that heâd signed the petition only at Kieftâs urging). Enmities festered for years, rupturing friendships and alliances, flashing out in violent brawls. When the servant Dirck attacked Damen a few weeks after the massacre, it was surely a spillover from the general reservoir of poison still brimming, and mild under the circumstances.
Damen was a hated man, Adrienne Cuville a despised woman, and her daughter Rachel not much better thought of than her mother and stepfather. In 1641 sheâd been publicly called âa woman in or about the fortâ (a prostitute, in other words) âwho pays money to bootââapparently so ravenous for sex that if a prospect turned her down, sheâd offer cash just for the pleasure of the tumble. This didnât, however, raise any impediment to Cornelis Van Tienhoven, who married her and in whom she more than met her match. As described by contemporaries, he was repellent: pale-haired and obese, with a bloated red face and a wen bulbing out from the side of one cheek. One complaint ...