![]()
How do you divide the world into known and unknown?
Stranger is a slippery wordāyou think you know what it means until you try to account for
yourself. It names an idea that invisibly structures your everyday life, what you see, the choices you make, the way you move. Are you ready to see just how slippery it is? Tell me what you mean
when you say stranger.
I ask this a lot, and almost everything I hear boils down to this wonderfully contradictory list.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā Someone youāve only seen once.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā The entire world of people youāve never met or encountered.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā All the people who are unknown to you but possibly knowable, the people who youāre aware of as individuals in some way, but have never met or
encountered in person.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā People you have personal information about but have not met, like a friend of a friend, or a public person.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā A person who doesnāt share your context, whether that is ideological or geographical.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā A person you donāt have anything in common with.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā Someone who is not part of any group you define yourself as belonging to.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā Someone you canāt understand.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā Someone who is a threat.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā Someone you encounter frequently but donāt know anything about other than what you can observe.
ā¢Ā Ā Ā Someone whose name you donāt know.
When we examine our ideas about strangers, the notion that a stranger is someone to be afraid of often falls away, chalked up to childhood training in āstranger
dangerā or something gleaned from the media, in contradiction to our lived experiences. Who we think is a stranger is an individual thing. Itās also defined by culture and history. The
ways we interact with strangersāand so our very ideas of whom they areācan change in response to major events. During major disruptions in our lives, in storms, floods, outages, transit
strikes, we suspend our usual expectations and put feelings of community above fear. Ever more frequent terrorist attacks by Islamic fundamentalists around the world have directly increased
suspicion of strangersāand have fueled illogical and unwarranted assumptions about what kind of stranger poses a threat.
Our concepts of strangers and how we behave toward them also vary by situation. Is it dark, am I alone, am I in familiar territory, am I lost, am I in the minority in this place?
Who counts as a stranger? Who do we greet? Who do we avoid? My four-year-old daughter forces me to ask these questions constantly. My family lives in a city, in an area with residential blocks
and commercial streets crossing each other. As my daughter and I walk around the neighborhood, I watch her sort strangers.
I say hello to most people, and she wants to know why. Are they our friend? sheāll ask. āNo, just a neighborā might be the answer when itās
someone we see often or people who are walking near our house. Do we know them? āNo, weāve never met them.ā Why did you say hi
then? āItās just nice to be friendly.ā I think twice when I tell her that, even though I mean it. And as a woman, I know very well that strangers on the street donāt
always have such noble intentions. It is good to be friendly, and itās good to learn when not to be. But none of that means we have to be afraid.
Our apartment is near a halfway house, and some of the people who live there are hard cases, apparently a little āoffā in one way or another. They might be dressed in very shabby or
unwashed clothes, or behaving in ways that look like theyāre high on something. Their speech or body language sometimes puts me on alert for behavior that may or may not be harmless. I feel
varying degrees of discomfort about any of these situations, and I want my daughter to see that I make choicesāand learn to make her ownāabout who I greet and how I avoid interacting
with someone I think might be unpredictable or unpleasant. I want her to understand an essential distinction in a world of strangers: unpredictable and unpleasant are not by definition
dangerous.
On our way to school one morning there was a man in the middle of the block we usually walk down, and he was yelling angrily at the air, stomping his feet and swinging his arms. I said to my
daughter, āLetās go another way.ā She asked, Why canāt we go that way, isnāt he our neighbor? Once a question is asked, it snakes through
many others. I had to wonder what made me uneasy and whether or not it was based on good instincts or prejudice Iām blind to. That day, I said, āWell, that man looks pretty upset and I
donāt want to get too close to him.ā Why is he upset? she asked. āI donāt know whatās bothering him, but I can tell by the way heās
yelling and what heās doing with his body that I donāt want to get near him right now.ā I watched her taking that in. I had sidestepped the shorthand of saying, āHeās
acting crazy,ā though thatās what I would have said to an adult. I wasnāt being delicate about my choice of language as much as I was avoiding a cascade of questions I
wasnāt prepared to answer there on that street corner. Whatās crazy? How did he get that way? Is he always crazy? How do I know someone is crazy?
What was important to me in that moment was that she learn to perceive, not learn to name or categorize.
Thatās an uphill battle, because categorizing is something human brains do. We categorize people as a shortcut to learning about them. We see young, old, white, black, male, female,
stranger, friend, and we use the information we store in that box, the box labeled OLD or FEMALE or STRANGER to define them. Sometimes thatās the best we can do, but it creates a dreadful
lack of knowing at the individual level.
Categorization and its malignant offspring, stereotyping, are learned at home, in school, on the street. These ways we have of seeing each other also have deep roots in human history. The blunt
argument made by some academics (and further oversimplified by the media) says we became hardwired for this in an early moment in human evolution, when having a strong sense of āus and
themā helped humans in an extremely resource-poor environment choose who to help and who to exclude so that their group had a better shot at survival. In other words, fear and bias were once
useful. It may be in one way or another true that we were once dependent on keeping our groups closed. But turn your most suspicious eye on theories that say humans are hardwired for anything.
Someone may be using an idea as a sledgehammer. That word is trying to tell you thereās something we canāt change. The fact that āus and themā thinking has long roots in
human history does not mean that it is natural, or acceptable. It does not mean bias is inevitable and immutable, or that fearful and defensive instincts should continue to drive us.
Thereās no question: We have to choose whom to trust. The world is full of dangers, and a few of them arrive in the form of an unfamiliar face. We have to navigate that world safely
somehow. We can make these choices with attention and grace. If we donāt, we will find ourselves in a one-dimensional world, deprived of honest human connections and interruptions that awaken
us.
None of this is easy. To learn to truly see someone youāve never met is hard. Slotting them into categories is a lazy shortcut we rely on too often. Relying on your
perceptionsāgiving careful attention to what your senses are telling you without jumping to conclusionsācosts time and effort. Itās not a lightning reflex but a skill to be
learned. You can practice it in places with low stakes. Take a walk in the park, in daylight, and look at the people around you. What do you see? What puts you at ease or sets you on edge? Who
counts as a stranger?
Whatever you find, and wherever you think it comes from, one thing is certain: we are surrounded by individuals, not categories. There are adventures to be had here, adventures you can set out
for every day of your life. To really understand how you divide the world, to use your senses to choose whom to make familiar, and to stop and say hello to a stranger, these bold acts can transform
your emotional experience of the public world. And you can transform the public world itself right along with you.
![]()
This if nothing else: Talking to strangers is good for you. Talking to a stranger is, at its best, an exquisite interruption of what you were expecting to happen when you walked down the street or rode on a bus, shopped at the grocery store or wandered around a museum, whiled away some time on a park bench or waited in a long, slow line. When something unexpected happens it calls you to full attention, turns your awareness outward to the world. You are awake. When you interact with a stranger youāre not in your own head, youāre not on autopilot from here to there. You are present in the moment. And to be present is to feel alive.
You are also connected. Conversations with strangers fill an essential need, one you might think only people you know can fill.
The name of that need is intimacy. When people donāt have the makings of intimacy in their livesāa sense of connection, of belonging to some form of community, of closeness to othersāthey suffer. The relationships we usually call intimate are with family, friends, romantic attachments, mentors, and confessors. The people we know as well as ourselves, the people we see often and miss when theyāre gone, the people who make us feel at home. This kind of closeness is a long, taut thread that ties us over time.
But the need for intimacy casts a wider net than you might think. There is another kind of intimate relationship, one that holds us together for just a fleeting moment and then vanishes. Its brief and bounded nature takes nothing away from the reality that an intimate moment has been shared: unguarded, honest, with meaningful interior echoes. This is street intimacy. You find it, when youāre lucky, by talking to strangers.
If intimacy is private, street intimacy is public. Itās a nod of acknowledgment exchanged on the sidewalk, a glance held or a quick āhelloā when you sit next to someone on the subway, a parting ātake it easyā to the last person getting off the elevator before you do. You find it in all the places people who donāt know each other cross paths in passing.
A friend of mine, thirty years ago, was on a train stuck in the station, looking out the doors. Another train pulled up across the platform, and it too went nowhere. She held the gaze of a man on the other train for the long seconds their trains held still. As the doors closed, they waved to each other. The interaction was so emotionally moving for her that she remembers it to this day. For her, it was a moment of connection with a stranger that felt real and good. They didnāt need to know each other. Just being human was enough.
You see, it doesnāt take much. A shared glance or an exchange of what seems on the surface to be inconsequential patter can make you happy or etch itself into your memory. Whatās happened is that your existence as a person has been noticed and spoken to. You have been seen.
Ritualistic things we say in passing that we donāt really mean much by, like āHow are you?,ā āGood morning,ā āNice day, isnāt it?,ā āTake it easy,ā āHow you feelinā?,ā āHi, mami,ā āCómo estĆ”s?,ā these phrases are known to linguists as phatic communication. Theyāre things we say that have little semantic valueāweāre not really communicating anything factual or necessary. What they have is tremendous social value. These meaningless meaningful words are used between strangers as well as between people who are close. What we mean when we say those things is this: I see you there, hello. These mere acknowledgments carry genuine pleasure and togetherness. We donāt want a real answer, weāre affirming each otherās existenceāand that is no small thing.
You can choose to make such simple acknowledgments a habit, and that choice can change you. When experimenters asked a group of customers at Starbucks to either talk to the barista as if they were an acquaintance or to refrain from talk, the ones who made conversation left with positive feelings. Similarly, people on a commuter train were asked to talk to strangers (or not), as were people in the waiting room of an experimental psychology lab where they believed they were in limbo for an experiment to begin. The results of these experiments demonstrated to the researchers that, in general, people feel good when they talk to strangersāeven if they expect not to. Think about how extraordinary this is: These fleeting connections, what scholars call āminimal social interactions,ā leave us with such real feelings of connectedness that they actually contribute to fulfilling the basic human need for sociability.
Itās Valentineās Day and the subway is full of people who look either sad or happy, no one is indifferent. I squeeze in the middle seat next to a short, round guy with doe eyes and a shaved head. He adjusts a little, but heās still got half my seat.
āIām sorry,ā he says, in the gentlest voice. āIām getting off at the next stop and Iām really uncomfortable, thatās why Iām still sitting like this all spread out.ā
āItās okay,ā I tell him. āIāve got enough room.ā Iāve turned and looked him in the eye. Iām smiling. Itās really all right. For some reason I want him to know that.
He looks at me a moment. āYou know, I donāt have a valentine, and thatās okay. At my age, I realize that love is my valentine. Just love. You can share love with your family, your aunt, your brother, your pet, your cousin, you can share it with everybody.ā
āYou can share my seat,ā I tell him.
āSee, itās beautiful, right? Happy Valentineās Day,ā he says, rising as the train slows its way into the station.
⢠⢠ā¢
The Skin of the Self
As much as cities are shot through with chances to connect in passing moments, they are also full of noise and tension and crowds, of insults and injuries, of people who donāt see each other. Street intimacy is special precisely because it is unexpected and far from automatic. City dwellers arenāt primed for it. When you walk out the door, you toss your coat on and with it you cover your inner life with a protective shell. Itās a thin, invisible boundary that keeps the soft parts of your self safe from people you donāt know. Without it, the vulnerability is too great. Just because someone is near you, or interacting with you by necessity, that doesnāt mean you owe them access to your inner life. We have contradictory desires. We want to be seen and we want not to be seen. We want to be known and we want not to be known. In every interaction we have, the thickness or thinness of that boundary is negotiated over and over. We close and we open, open and close.
Sometimes when you talk to a stranger it seems that youāve gotten more than a dose of their small talk, youāve gotten a real glimpse of their inner self. And part of the ...