Ten years ago, while nobody was watchingâor, rather, while everyone was looking in the wrong directionâa writer of detective stories turned into a major American novelist.
âJohn Leonard, The New York Times Book Review
. . . the Archer books, the finest series of detective novels ever written by an American.
âWilliam Goldman, The New York Times Book Review
In 1969, when most literate readers thought detective stories beneath consideration and mystery fiction rarely appeared on best-seller lists, a handful of New York journalists conspired to push a California writer of private-eye novels to the front rank of American letters.
The writer was Ross Macdonald, a mystery novelist who didnât so much transcend the genre as elevate it, showing again (like Hammett, Faulkner, Collins, Dickens, Greene, and many others since Poe) how the crime story can at any time become art.
The conspiracy worked.
Front-page celebrations in the New York Times Book Review and a cover story in Newsweek turned Ross Macdonaldâs books about detective Lew Archer into national best-sellers. Movies and a television series were made. Millions of Macdonaldâs books were sold. After twenty years in the mystery field, Ross Macdonald was an overnight success.
The world at large discovered a writer already well known to mystery fans. Crime-fiction reviewers had long hailed Macdonald as the hard-boiled successor to Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler. His influence on a generation of mystery writers was profound. In such classic works as The Doomsters, The Galton Case, The Chill, Black Money, The Goodbye Look, The Underground Man, and Sleeping Beauty, Macdonald opened fresh thematic territory and set a new literary standard for his genre. Vital trends in modern crime fiction drew impetus from Macdonaldâs work. Writers as diverse as Sara Paretsky, Jonathan Kellerman, Jerome Charyn, and James Ellroy have called Macdonald an influence. Simply as a bestselling mystery author he broke ground; his success, before a time when genre authors routinely became household names, showed the way for the future Parkers, Graftons, Hillermans, Cornwells, and Mosleys.
Ross Macdonaldâs appeal and importance extended beyond the mystery field. He was seen as an important California author, a novelist who evoked his region as tellingly as such mainstream writers as Nathanael West and Joan Didion. Before he died, Macdonald was given the Los Angeles Timesâs Robert Kirsch Award for a distinguished body of work about the West. Some critics ranked him among the best American novelists of his generation.
By any standard he was remarkable. His first books, patterned on Hammett and Chandler, were at once vivid chronicles of a postwar California and elaborate retellings of Greek and other classic myths. Gradually he swapped the hard-boiled trappings for more subjective themes: personal identity, the family secret, the family scapegoat, the childhood trauma; how men and women need and battle each other, how the buried past rises like a skeleton to confront the present. He brought the tragic drama of Freud and the psychology of Sophocles to detective stories, and his prose flashed with poetic imagery. By the time of his commercial breakthrough, some of Macdonaldâs concerns (the breakdown between generations, the fragility of moral and global ecologies) held special resonance for a country divided by an unpopular war and alarmed for the environment. His vision was strong enough to spill into real life, where a news story or a friendâs revelation could prompt the comment âJust like a Ross Macdonald novel.â
It was a vision with meaning for all sorts of readers. Macdonald got fan mail from soldiers, professors, teenagers, movie directors, ministers, housewives, poets. He was claimed as a colleague by good writers around the world, including Eudora Welty, Andrey Voznesensky, Elizabeth Bowen, Thomas Berger, Marshall McLuhan, Margaret Laurence, Osvaldo Soriano, Hugh Kenner, Nelson Algren, Donald Davie, and Reynolds Price.
When he died in 1983, Ross Macdonald was the best-known and most highly regarded crime-fiction writer in America. But (despite dozens of articles, two documentary films, and two critical studies) not much was known about the author of âthe finest series of detective novels ever written by an American.â
It was no secret Ross Macdonald was the pseudonym of Kenneth Millar, a Santa Barbara man married to another good mystery writer, Margaret Millar. But his official biography was spare: born in northern California of Canadian parents, raised in Ontario and other provinces, he earned a doctorate at Michigan, served in the U.S. Navy, and moved with wife and daughter to California in 1946. In a handful of autobiographical essays, Millar seemed to conceal as much as he told.
Hiding things came second nature, to protect himself and spare his family. Like the people in his fiction, Millar had secrets, and he persuaded sympathetic journalists to collaborate in keeping them.
Yet he believed in the writing of candid biography and expected to be its subject. He valued works that made connections between a novelistâs life and his fiction. Millar preserved much material that proved helpful in explicating the books of Ross Macdonald, who admitted he was one of those authors who strew their novels with personal clues, âlike burglars who secretly wish to be caught.â Among the revealing documents Millar left future literary detectives were a candid notebook memoir, an unpublished autobiographical novel, and thirty yearsâ correspondence.
Nowâafter the deaths of his widow, their only child, and their only grandchild; after unrestricted examination of the Kenneth and Margaret Millar Papers at the University of California, Irvine, as well as other archivesâ material; and after hundreds of interviews with those who knew Millarâa fuller picture emerges of this admired American writer.
*Â Â *Â Â *
Ross Macdonald came to crime writing honestly. Virtually fatherless and growing up poor, Kenneth Millar broke social and moral laws: having sex from the age of eight, getting drunk at twelve, fighting violently, stealing. âIâm amazed at some of the chances I took as a boy,â he admitted. Worse than the things he did were those he imagined. Mad at the world and at his lot in life, he sometimes felt angry enough to kill. As a youngster he read Poe and Hawthorne and Dostoyevsky: writers who wrestled with the good and the bad angels he too was assaulted by. When he wrote his own mystery stories, Millar saw himself in his talesâ wrongdoers. âI donât have to be violent,â he said, âmy books are.â
By his own reckoning, he barely escaped being a criminal. When he stopped breaking laws before starting college, he fashioned a code of conduct for himself (and others) as unyielding as the formal religious creeds he had rejected. Millar put himself in a behavioral box as if his life or mental health depended on it, though his psyche often strained against the boxâs walls. He stayed over forty years in an often rancorous marriage, putting its tensions to use as he turned his wife and himself into published authors. He stayed in the box of detective fiction, determined to provide for his family and avoid the failures of his irresponsible father.
âThe Split Manâ was a title Macdonald often played with. Millar himself was a man split along national, cultural, intellectual, professional, and even sexual fault lines. Born in California, raised in Canada, as a young man he thought of moving to England. All his life he felt on the wrong side of whatever border heâd most recently crossed. The roots of Macdonaldâs tales of troubled families in a corrupted California lay in Millarâs bleak Ontario childhood with its âlong conspiracies of silent pain.â
The man who created the hard-boiled Lew Archer was one of the most brilliant graduate students in the history of the University of Michigan. While Macdonaldâs private-eye stories were being published in Manhunt magazine next to Mickey Spillaneâs (which he detested), Millar was writing a Ph.D. dissertation on the psychological criticism of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. His academic colleagues disparaged or despaired of his detective fiction; his fellow crime writers were puzzled or intimidated by his university work.
In the sunshine of Santa Barbara, California, Kenneth Millar dressed like a Midwesterner and spoke with a Scots-Canadian accent. In the wealthy heart of Nixon and Reagan country, he was a Stevensonian Democrat; even as a beach-club member, he still felt like an underdog.
He was a gentle man with a frightening temper, an intellectual who went to murder trials, a person of great pride and startling humility. Once or twice he nearly broke under his complexities. Like Oedipus (a recurring archetype in Macdonaldâs fiction and Millarâs psyche), he seemed to bring about the tragedies he tried to avoid. Determined to be the good parent his own were not, Millar fathered an only child whose life was scarred by emotional and legal trauma. Obsessed with not causing fatal harm, he saw his daughter become entangled in the sort of headline-making events heâd always dreaded, incidents his own stories seemed to eerily foretell. At his daughterâs darkest hours, Millar acted like his booksâ hero Lew Archer; then turned her crises into the fiction from which they might have sprung.
In his novels, Millar resolved his contradictions: there he hid and revealed an aching loneliness, a melancholy humor, and a lifetime of anger, fear, and regret. These singular works changed their genre and changed the way readers saw the world. In these stories, ordinary families became the stuff of mystery; and there was always guilt enough to go around. We recognized ourselves as characters in Ross Macdonaldâs novels. And the most interesting Macdonald character of all was Kenneth Millar.
The Mariner tells how the ship sailed southward with a good wind and fair weather, till it reached the line.
The ship was cheered, the harbour cleared,
Merrily did we drop
Below the kirk, below the hill,
Below the lighthouse top.
The Sun came up upon the left,
Out of the sea came he!
And he shone bright, and on the right
Went down into the sea.
âS. T. Coleridge, âThe Rime of the Ancient Marinerâ
Before Alzheimerâs disease put an end to his writing, Millar recorded his earliest memories: recollections formed in the final months of World War One, in Vancouver, British Columbia. His father was a harbor-boat pilot there, and Millar recalled the âunforgettableâ occasion when his dad took him to sea: âI stood beside him in the offshore light, with his hands and my hand on the wheel.â At the age of sixty-three, he judged this âthe happiest day of my childhood if not my life.â
Millarâs parents separated when he was four, and his mother took him to a harsher province. As a troubled child and an uneasy adult, Ken Millar mourned the loss of that moment of bliss and belonging, of being loved and protected. The fiction he wrote was informed by the painful knowledge of the difference between the way life was supposed to be and the way it was. In his books, people looked obsessively for lost parents and vanished birthrights; children took dangerous paths; a detective tried to discover when and where and why it all went wrong.
Vancouver wasnât the first paradise he lost. Millarâs birthplace was California, something his parents never let him forget. In his youth that state took on a golden aura: the Great Right Place where he should be but wasnât. He was born in Los Gatos, near San Francisco, during a heavy rainstorm at three in the morning of Monday, December 13, 1915.
The Bay Area was celebrating that year, with a Panama-Pacific Exposition in San Francisco to mark completion of the Panama Canal and the cityâs recovery from the 1906 earthquake and fire. This Millar baby also became news of a sort: his father wrote a poem about him that was printed in the Los Gatos Mail. The poet-father was John Macdonald âJackâ Millar, a forty-two-year-old Canadian whoâd edited newspapers in British Columbia and Alberta settlements for the past several years. Defying its spelling, the family name was pronounced âMiller,â an ambiguous touchstone for a son whoâd spend a lifetime pondering questions of identity.
The dad had his own obsession with such matters, having lived with Indians in the Northwest Territories, befriended Japanese fishing families in Vancouver, and for years written poems in the dialect of a Scotland heâd never seen.
John Macdonald Millarâs Scottish connection came through his father, another John Millar, who had emigrated from Galashiels (near Edinburgh) to southern Ontario, Canada, in 1856. The senior John Millar was a solid citizen, serving at different times as reeve (mayor), township clerk, postmaster, police magistrate, and justice of the peace. He and his Scots-Canadian wife had nine children, seven of whom survived; the sixth was Jack Millar, born in 1873. After teaching school and keeping a general store, the senior Millar started the Walkerton Herald, a newspaper that stayed in business for at least a century. Printerâs ink was in the Millar blood, some said: the first successful Scottish printer, around 1506, was a Millar. This âfatal predisposition to wordsâ was passed on to Jackâalong with a youthful rebellion. Jack Millar adopted his fatherâs Liberal politics but rejected his Presbyterian faith, becoming an admirer of Robert Green Ingersoll, âthe Great Agnostic.â Like John Millar, whoâd sailed from Scotland as a teenager, the teenaged Jack Millar left the family home early to strike out on his own.
Jack Millar was medium sized but powerfully built, a good wrestler and strong swimmer. He made his way to the western Canadian provinces, then south into the United States, where he mined for silver in Colorado. Back in Canada, he lived for close to a year with Indians around Great Slave Lake. In 1899, the territory-wise Jack Millar joined two Toronto newspapermen, John Innes and J. P. McConnell, on a six-week pack-train journey across Alberta and British Columbia.
Jack was in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1907, when young William Mackenzie King, federal deputy minister of labor, came to investigate anti-Japanese riots there. Millar, friendly with the portâs Japanese fishermen, informally helped the future prime minister in his inquiries.
A year later, in Red Deer, Alberta, the thirty-four-year-old Millar met a tall, attractive, thirty-three-year-old former nurse named Anna Moyer. Jack courted Annie on horseback and read her his Robbie Burns-like poems. Born in Walkerton, the town whose newspaper Jackâs dad had started, Annie had turned down several youthful suitors in order to study and work in Canada and the States. Typhoid fever caught from a hospital patient had ended her nursing. She was ready to accept Jackâs proposal. Before they married, John Macdonald Millar, like his father before him, became a newspaper editor-manager, taking over a monthly in the copper-mining town of Greenwood, British Columbia; then starting his own paper in Granum, Alberta. Jack and Annie were married in Calgary, Alberta, in September 1909.
Millar put out three other papers in his first four years of marriage, trekking with Annie to frontier mining, logging, and shipping towns in British Columbia and Alberta. It was a rough haul. Annie had two stillbirths before she and Jack moved to San Diego, California, in 1913. They hoped the California climate would give them a healthy baby. But in San Diego, in 1913, they buried another infant.
Annie had family living in Escondido, near San Diego, including her married sister Adeline, a Christian Science convert. Adeline told Annie, raised Methodist like her, that if she joined Mary Baker Eddyâs church, sheâd have a healthy baby. Annie converted. From San Diego, the Millars went north to Los Gatos, where Annie Millar gave birth to Kenneth. This baby was healthyâtwelve and a half poundsâwith eyes that were an almost violet blue: his motherâs eyes.
The Millars returned to Canada. After a mild...