PART I
THE ROAD WEāVE TRAVELED
INTRODUCTION
IN THE JUNGLE, THE MIGHTY JUNGLE, THE LION SLEEPS TONIGHT
In 2001, an archeological team in the Djurab Desert discovered the remains of what they described as mankindās oldest living ancestor, an apelike mammal with prominent brows. They dubbed this new species Sahelanthropus tchadensis. More chimpanzee than human, these primates lived in groups in a lakeside forest that gave way seven million years ago to the Saharan desert sands of northern Africa.
During the excavation, the team also encountered the remains of a large saber-toothed cat the size of a lion, which hunted these early humans as prey. The catsā six-inch front sabers were perfectly suited for carving through flesh and bone, and their low-slung frames were adapted for stealthily stalking their next meals. Nothing could outrun these powerful creatures, certainly not the primates of North Africa that lived in constant fear of them.
āWith our present data, we donāt know what precisely the interactions were between a primate and a big carnivore,ā said Patrick Vignaud, director of the University of Poitiersā Institute of Paleoprimatology and Human Paleontology. āBut probably these interactions were not so friendly.ā
We can imagine that interaction seven million years ago: a pair of our ancestors foraging for food near a pool of water, their child playing cheerfully near the motherās feet. And then, without warning, a shadow in the brush becomes a living, breathing, snarling vision of death. The mother cries out and leaps to protect her baby. The father steps in between the beast and his family. The hairs on the back of both the hunterās and the huntedās necks stand up straight. Nostrils flare, eyes squint, jaws clench. Beads of sweat appear. Survival instincts kick in as the adrenaline flows.
They circle each other slowly. An instant later, the monster leaps forward. Nails and teeth dig into flesh. Dust swirls upward from the ground, lodging in the primateās throat, lungs, and eyes. The warm-iron taste of lifeblood fills the catās mouth as saliva and blood spill out. Droplets of red-brown spatter the dry ground.
Then, with one swift and well-placed blow to the giant catās head, the battle ends. The primate escapes this timeābruised, battered, and bloodied.
His mate brings over their frightened child, and they all embrace. Heart rates begin to slow, and adrenaline levels recede, but something has irrevocably changed for them. The fear has burrowed deep into their subconscious, and it will never really leave.
Whether weāre aware of it or not, all of us are attracted toāand strangely beholden toāfeelings of fear. Our bodies are simply wired that way. The ultimate fear, of course, is of the end. Of death itself. The fear of an encounter with a saber-toothed cat haunts Sahelanthropus tchadensis and his descendantsāusāfor eternity. Parents and children look carefully to every shadow for squinted yellow eyes hovering over sharp teeth.
Can you hear it? The low rumble that turns into a growl and eventually into a panting snarl? The beast is getting closer. The idea of death from the shadows, in all its forms, stalks us all.
ā
What does any of this have to do with Woodrow Wilson or Hillary Clinton? Itās a good question, and itās what weāre going to explore in this book. Fear, as well as the hopeful (if not pointless) solutions offered to combat it, is ultimately what make progressivism so successful. Itās what makes otherwise intelligent, rational, and good human beings succumb so easily to obviously absurd visions of the future painted by politicians. Itās why our brothers and sisters and our childrenāand sometimes even you and Iāare continually tempted by the progressive siren song.
Many experts have written about progressivism. Iāve talked about it on the air for more than a decade now, so Iām guessing you are already familiar with its frightening and demonstrable outcomes: the insatiable thirst for control and betterment of others; the determination to build a massive, all-controlling welfare state that holds the rest of us hostage to its preferences and whims; and the flirtation with totalitarianism masked by the guise of political correctness. Progressives regularly espouse ideas and support causes that openly involve the subjugation, murder, or mutilation of their fellow human beings, always in the name of a better world for all.
When their policies are actually implemented, they unfailingly achieve the opposite of their promised results. And yet, despite this, no amount of empirical data seems to dissuade progressives and their acolytes from embracing their flawed policies the next time around, even when they can easily be shown to be disastrous.
Given these failures time and time again, itās only right to wonder how it is that progressive leaders and voters continue to cling to policies and programs that so plainly donāt work. Are progressive leaders such masters of lying and deception that their followers can be easily fooled, even in the face of undeniable evidence? Or is it rather that followers of progressivism are so eager to be lied to that they willfully ignore facts and reason?
As weāll find out together in this book, the answer is both.
We all know what progressives want to do. We all know how easily they lie and how easily adherents allow themselves to be lied to. But what has rarely been asked or discussed is the more fundamental question: Why? Where does the urge originate from, and how does it hold so much power over the human mind? How does this impulse to build institutions and pass laws that dictate the behavior of others, stamping out individual choice in favor of the collective, overtake logic and sound thinking so often?
Each of us is born a unique, individual being, possessing free will and a mind capable of making rational choices. Weāre capable of caring for both our loved ones and ourselves. But devotees of progressivism reject their free will and rational capacity. What makes people adopt a philosophy that is so fundamentally incompatible with their natural birthright as free and independent beings who are able to determine their own future?
The answer brings us back to the saber-toothed cat and to the fear-hope dynamic buried deep within all of us.
Human beings are creatures of the natural world, following natural laws that govern all species on earth. Like that of our primate ancestors and all other mammals, our DNA is filled with millions of years of collective experience. The stories of their survival and our evolution are written in organic matter such as proteins and nucleic acids that form vast ribbons of DNA. As much as they are indicative of our past, these strands of DNA also, in many ways, determine our futureāwhether weāre prone to cancer, whether our children will have light skin or dark skin, whether weāll have a thick head of hair or be bald.
Our genetic sequencing also, it turns out, has a large effect on our political future.
Hereās the short version. Our ancestors, among all creatures that have ever existed, were endowed by their creator with something unique in the animal kingdom, something that sets us apart from every other living organism: an awareness of our unavoidable death. It is the fundamental difference between human beings and every other advanced mammal. No other species except for humans has both the inherent desire to live plus the foreknowledge that we wonāt.
The awareness of death exists both consciously and unconsciously at the same time. Like members of all species, we experience fear as an inherent defense mechanism when faced with the danger of death or harm. That is the natural tool we are given to help us survive. But human beings are aware and afraid not only of immediate potential threats, as other creatures are, but also of future inevitable dangers, outside our control and perception, as other creatures are not. Human beings, therefore, more than any other living organisms, live in a constant state of terror over the danger of death. For some of us, the certainty of our death can create a sense of hopelessness. Each of us, and those we love and care about, will die. Eventually, no matter how many individual fights we might win against beasts from the underbrush, one of them will get us.
As weāve evolved, the higher brain functions that enabled self-awareness, imagination, and reason had to create a counterbalance to the constant state of terror that came from foreknowledge of our own death. Psychologists identify this as a sort of coping mechanism that helps us get out of bed each day and march forward with life. This is the other quintessentially human psychological trait: hope. Hope is what empowers us to defy fear, to arm ourselves and fight against the saber-toothed cat. Hope is what enables inherently irrational action against impossible odds, fighting each battle, while knowing that the war will eventually be lost.
Dr. Jerome Groopman, a Harvard Medical School professor who has spent years studying the science of hope, discovered that the brain releases chemicals that cause a hopeful sensation after a traumatizing experience. āHope helps us overcome hurdles that we otherwise could not scale,ā he wrote, āand it moves us forward to a place where healing can occur.ā
These chemicals create an effect almost identical to that of morphine: a calming, peaceful sensation. The feeling of succumbing to fears and then transcending them with hope becomes addictive. Itās why we love horror movies and Halloween. Itās why amusement parks strive to build the tallest, fastest roller coasters every year. Itās why adrenaline junkies jump out of airplanes and off bridges. Itās why tens of thousands flock to endurance events like triathlons and Ironman races. Itās why Navy SEALs and Army Rangers love the thrill of combat and why they continually subject themselves to grueling tests beforehand.
Progressivism works at both levels of the unique duality of the human psyche. Progressives first succumb to their own fear, and then they utilize that fear by instilling it in others. They helpfully identify the saber-toothed catsāthe things that threaten us and will ultimately lead to our demiseāhoping to export their fears to the rest of the herd so that others can be more easily controlled.
The pattern is always the same. First, they construct elaborate enemies that they say will kill us: overpopulation, global warming, gun violence, pornography, public health epidemics, bullying, SUVs, recreational drug use, or even masculinity itself. These are the saber-toothed cats. Then, having convinced us that we should be afraid of the predator in the brush, thereby filling our brains with adrenaline, anxiety, and stress, they offer us the āsolutionā that will allegedly kill the beast before it can kill us.
Itās a never-ending cycle by progressives: introduce fear; exploit it; introduce hope; exploit it.
ā¦
This book will present a clear, concise, and documented picture of progressives as they really are: eugenicists, racists, misogynists, terrorists, and authoritarian tyrants. Weāll dig through their own words, most of which have been airbrushed out of the official histories by liberal historians whoād rather we not know the truth about their intellectual forebears and the men and women they hold up in our childrenās classrooms as heroes of democracy. Weāll unveil the progressivesā methods. Weāll puncture their lies, both the ones they tell us and the ones they tell themselves.
But more than that, I want you to walk away with the why and the how that animate the sordid history of progressivism and the perils it presents to a free people. Understanding this is vital to understanding the roots of the progressive impulse, seeing it for what it is, and freeing yourself from it.
Political movementsāparticularly the most pernicious onesāhave always used fear as a selling point. Hitler used fear of the Jews. Hitler and Mussolini whipped up fear of the Communists in Russia, citing Mongolian-tainted blood. The Communists told their followers to fear the Fascists, the church, God, and capitalism. The progressives weāll study arenāt all that different.
But wait, you say, there are differences. There was, for example, no racial component to how progressives employed fear to sell their program.
Think again.
Progressives used fear of nonwhites as a big part of their own particular āfear factor.ā
Exhibit A: Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. She advocated contraception as a tool to control inferior populations, w...