PART ONE
Why Terrible Experiences Can Also Be Good for You
The Science Behind Trauma and Positive Change
CHAPTER 1
Reversing Psychology
How Two Researchers Discovered the Transformative Power of Trauma
ON A SPRING MORNING IN 2009, Luther Delp sat on his pearl-white 1600 Kawasaki Vulcan motorcycle at a stoplight in Jacksonville, Florida. He loved that bike. Delp, who was fifty-nine years old at the time, had just put a thousand-dollar LED light system on the motorcycle so it could flash a multicolored glow on the road as he barreled down the highway. Even the wheels lit up. That spring morning he was on his way to Daytona Bike Week to buy a motorcycle for his wife, Debbie.
As Delp idled at the stoplight, a woman sped down the road in her car. She hadnât noticed the line of cars waiting for the light in front of her. And she never saw the motorcycle at the end of that line. She hit Delp at full speed. He was launched over three cars and landed on the fourth one with such force that he broke his back, multiple ribs, and his hips. He punctured his lung, and broke several teeth and his nose. His injuries were so catastrophic that he died right there at the intersection. Paramedics managed to revive him and then rushed him to the hospital. There he flatlined again and was revived once more. Doctors gave him twelve pints of blood. It poured through him.
Delpâs blood pressure was so low that he couldnât take any painkillers for a torturous week while his doctors waited until he was strong enough to undergo surgery. The pain was overwhelming. âI was in so much pain. I told God, âIf this is all it is, please take me now,â â he says.
Butch and Cindy Davis were among the close friends who gathered in the waiting room with Delpâs wife, Debbie. âWe didnât think he was going to make it,â says Davis. âWe stayed in the hospital and held a vigil.â
Davis and her husband met the Delps at a square dance thirty years before the accident. The couples quickly became close friends, vacationing together in their motorhomes. The Delps would stay up until two or three in the morning talking about their lives and planning new trips. They had plenty of time for whatever pursuit they could dream up. Delp had worked as a welder for twenty-seven years. He invested in real estate and retired in his forties. Now he and his wife were living comfortably off their investments. âAll I did was play,â says Delp. âI had a lot of time to go jet-skiing, ride motorcycles, go four-wheeling. We used to go dancing three or four nights a week. We camped and traveled all over the U.S.â In the summers they went scalloping and waterskiing with Davis and her husband. They took cruises together with their children and grandchildren. Delpâs parents had died when they were young and so he felt like he needed to experience as much as he could while he had the chance, says Cindy Davis. âWe called him Lying Luther because you never knew what he was going to say next; he was a big kidder,â she says.
Delp had been so active, so physicalâalways the first to slide under the camper to fix somethingâthat Cindy couldnât imagine how he could live after such a catastrophic accident. âAfter such a trauma to his body, I didnât think that he wanted to pull through it,â she says.
But Delp did survive. In the beginning he couldnât even sit up on his own. He lost movement and feeling in his legs and had little control over his torso. He developed bedsores. One on his backside grew so large and deep that Debbie could just about see through to the bone. She tried to keep things positive. âWhen Iâd clean it and drain it, heâd ask, âHow does it look? Does it look any better?â and Iâd tell him, âYeah, a little bit. A little bit,â â she says. âI didnât want to discourage him. If he saw it, he would have completely given up on life. I really believe that and so I didnât tell him.â
Delp developed repeated infections. âSometimes his fever would be so bad that heâd be shaking and Iâd go over there and put blankets on him and lay on him and try to keep him warm,â says Debbie. Pressure sores continued to plague him. Psychologically he wasnât doing much better. He was angry with the world, with the woman who had put him in the hospital. âI was real mad about it,â he says. âShe should have been watching where she was going and then Iâd still be riding my motorcycle.â
Like many people in this situation, Delp thought that he would walk again. When a year passed and he was still in a chair, it was another blow. âIn my mind I thought it was only temporary,â he says. âDebbie bought a van and put a lift in it and I got mad. Nobody could have ever told me that it was going to be permanent. I figured a couple of weeks and Iâd start walking. I thought, We can always get rid of the van.â
But Delp was not going to walk again. âAfter I got out of the hospital, I realized that Iâm not going to get any better. What am I going to do? Am I just going to lay here and eat and watch TV?â
Delp is a big man, over six feet tall, broad-shouldered and barrel-chested, with close-cropped gray hair and a goatee. He loved traveling, getting outdoors, being active. And now he hated being in a wheelchair. Even more, he hated being seen in a wheelchair. After the accident, he avoided most of his old friends, a reminder of the outgoing, energetic life that he once had. He wouldnât even eat in a restaurant. Instead of going in, heâd wait in the van while Debbie picked up takeout. âI didnât want to be around somebody or see somebody that knew me and have them see me in a chair,â he says. âThat was a real hard thing.â
And that is where most people would expect Delpâs story to end, with him stuck in a wheelchair, miserable, angry, depressed, stewing over all that had been so violently taken from him. Whatever life he could build after his accident would surely not match up to the able-bodied one that he had lost: his happy and healthy retirement with nothing to do but accumulate motorized toys, travel with his wife, and indulge in the pursuits that he enjoyed. He had lost a lot, and he had every right to be upset about it. Perhaps Delp would be left with lingering post-traumatic stress symptoms such as anxiety, depression, insomnia, or even full-blown post-traumatic stress disorder. For decades nearly all of the psychological research into trauma and recovery focused on the debilitating problems that people like Delp can faceâanger, guilt, hypervigilance, emotional numbness, flashbacks, even suicidal impulses that can last for years. Trauma survivors like Delp suffer through psychological pain every bit as terrible and challenging as the physical pain they must face. And that is the story that everyone is the most familiar with.
But something different happened with Delp. Despite his depression and bitterness, he continued to work at his rehabilitation, exercising and lifting weights. One evening while Delp was working out, one of the staff members at Brooks Rehabilitation, where Delp did his physical therapy, encouraged Debbie to take her husband bowlingâit was a program sponsored by Brooks just for patients like Delp. Debbie brought it up, but Delp had no interest. Going out in public in his chair and trying something new, challenging, and likely awkward was a perfect combination of everything he had been avoiding since his accident. âHe didnât want to go,â she says. âSo I got him dressed and got him in his chair and heâd say, âWell, Iâm not going out.â And Iâd say, âThatâs fine,â and Iâd just humor him and get him out.â Once in the van, Delp agreed to go in, but just to watch. Then he rolled into the bowling alley and saw two dozen people bowling, talking, laughing, and having a good time. Most of them were in wheelchairs. Debbie got him a bowling ball and wheeled him next to a man with no arms who pushed his ball with a stick held up to his chin. The person on the other side of Delp had no hands. With little choice, Delp wheeled himself up to the line across the end of the lane, picked up the ball from his lap, and rolled it toward the pins. He started to talk to the people around him. He bowled some more. He stayed all evening.
In the van on the way home, he started laughing. When Debbie asked what was so funny, he told her, âYou know, the reason I didnât want to come here was that I didnât want to be around a bunch of handicapped people,â he says. âSomehow I didnât realize that I was going to be one of them.â That realization changed Delp. He had just found his community. The programs at Brooks and the people he met there would change his perspective on his life, and his own understanding of what he had to offer the world. âI feel normal because I can help these people. I have the use of my hands. Some people canât feed themselves,â says Delp. âI think that helped me get out of the depression more than anything else.â
Delp began volunteering at both the hospital and the rehabilitation center. He started talking to new spinal cord injury patients about what to expect, how the injury would change their lives, even how to manage basic things like bodily functions that would become complicated. Sometimes heâs on the phone until two oâclock in the morning with friends who are wheelchair-bound. He began giving talks to college students to recruit interns for Brooks from a nearby university. âBefore I got hurt, I would never have gotten up in front of a bunch of people and talked. Now I look forward to it,â says Delp. âTo go up to someoneâs hospital room, I never would have done stuff like that. I hated going to the hospital. I donât feel sorry for myself anymore.â
Davis has marveled at the changes in her old friend. âHeâs not the same person that we knew,â she says. âHeâs found a new way of life, of wanting to help others who are less fortunate than him.â She says that before, he was outgoing, a fun and active person, but never the center of attention. He would have never considered getting up in front of people to discuss serious topics; he just wasnât confident that he had anything to offer others. His identity was the fun-loving, active, outgoing guy who just soaked up life. But that has all changed. Delp isnât happy in the same way that he used to be. âItâs a different type of fulfillment that heâs getting now,â she says. âMaterialistic things have gone away and now he is giving of himself; the true love, the true happiness that he is making others feel is where he is coming from.â
Delp leads a full and meaningful life. He participates in several activities a day, everything from archery and skeet shooting to horseback riding or playing pool. He visits with patients, and helps to keep people motivated and engaged in the rehab center. He encourages people to get out to gatherings like the bowling night, and even gives some of them rides when they need it. He also lifts weights and swims to keep himself in shape so he can be as active as possible. âMy life changed that day,â Delp said of the accident. âI had a good life then, but I have a great life now.â
⢠⢠â˘
How could such a horrific accident with permanent, life-altering consequences transform a good life into a profoundly better and more meaningful one? Based on the conventional wisdom about trauma, Delp should have been left broken by his experience. But instead it transformed him. He left behind a happy life brimming with leisure and fun for a new life. Now he uses his time to help others. He finds meaning in his experiences and deeper value in his friendships. His life is different; he is different. Heâs a person that he could never have imagined the day before he was hit by that car.
It is only in the last thirty or so years that a handful of psychologists even began asking how this could be possible, how trauma could change a person so deeply. How could it upend everything someone knew about himself and force him to build his life and sense of self anew? How could someone come out the other side of such a terrible event better, wiser, and more fulfilled? Oddly enough, the ones who first delved into this topic, who gave the phenomenon a name, started out by looking at something else entirely.
One winter day in the early 1980s, two psychology professors from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Richard Tedeschi and Lawrence Calhoun, drove to Atlanta, Georgia, for a conference. Calhoun had been a tenured professor for some time and Tedeschi was going to receive tenure soon. And with that promotion would come a certain amount of freedom. The door was open for each of them to pursue research projects that were a little more unorthodox, ones that they just found interesting.
Calhoun is wiry and energetic. He has a bounce to his voice and an earnest, almost boyish enthusiasm about him. For most of his career he had studied how people respond to adversity in one form or another; his work included helping people overcome various life crises. It was something that had always interested him. âI was never interested in long-term psychotherapy,â says Calhoun. âI wanted short-term solutions; I wanted to work with people who were not psychotic, with whom I could make a difference and I could see that difference right away.â About the time that Tedeschi got tenure, Calhounâs research partner left and he was looking for someone new to work with.
Tedeschi is a sober counterpoint to Calhounâs animated personality. Heâs thoughtful and soft-spoken with a neatly trimmed moustache and a full head of graying hair. He fits just about anyoneâs preconceived notion of a psychologist. Itâs easy to imagine him saying in an even and unbiased tone, âSo how does that make you feel?â This slightly odd pair got along well and, more important, they had similar interests. Tedeschi was also looking for a new focus in his work, something not centered on pathologies like depression or anxiety. Over the course of the four-hour drive, they began talking about the possibility of working together and what they might study. âWouldnât it be really interesting to talk to old people and just ask them, âWhat have you learned about life that is useful, that youâd like to pass on to others?â â Calhoun remembers one of them saying. It wasnât long before they started doing just that.
They began their research by speaking to a group of widows. They didnât have elaborate questionnaires or psychological scales or models. They just asked open-ended questions and listened to what their subjects had to say. The women, who were between about fifty and eighty years old, mourned the loss of their husbands. Many of them cried nightly. Calhoun still remembers one woman who said she would wake in the middle of the night thinking she had just heard her husband put his key in the door. Then she would realize that he was gone and sheâd cry all over again. But, at the same time, they told the researchers that their husbandsâ deaths pushed them to discover how strong they could be. Some got together with friends more often, others grew much closer to their children. Some who had never driven a car got a driverâs license and gained a new independence.
Next Tedeschi and Calhoun began to speak with people who had been disabled through an accident or illness. One woman they met had become an advocate for disabled rights and saw her disability as an opportunity to find a new focus and to help others. Another person they met was a former musician and drug abuser who had been paralyzed from the waist down in a car accident. They were surprised by his attitude.
âHe was not saying, âIt shattered me; Iâm depressed and a shell of my former self,â â Calhoun says. Quite the opposite. While the musician was in the hospital, his doctor suggested he speak to some of the other patients who had been paralyzed and were struggling with their situation. âHe found some satisfaction from that,â says Tedeschi. âIt ultimately became his lifeâs work.â The man went back to school, got a masterâs degree, and started running a rehabilitation center for people with disabilities. In the opening of their first book on this phenomenon, Tedeschi and Calhoun quote the man as saying the accident âwas the one thing that happened in my life that I needed to have happen; it was probably the best thing that ever happened to me. . . . If I hadnât experienced this and lived through it, I likely wouldnât be here today. . . . If I had it to do all over again, I would want it to happen the same way.â
The pair combed through psychology journals looking for other studies that might confirm their findings and provide some context for the positive changes they were recording. It was unforgiving workâthey were looking for a phenomenon without a name. But bit by bit they came across a study here and there that validated what they were hearing. It was, Calhoun says, a bit like panning for gold.
One study they discovered was by a psychiatrist named William Sledge. Now a professor at the Yale School of Medicine and medical director of YaleâNew Haven Psychiatric Hospital, Sledge conducted a study of aviators captured during the Vietnam War. In the mid to late 1970s, after the Vietnam War was over, Sledge was a young psychiatrist in the U.S. Air Force who was assigned to evaluate the air force aviators who had been held by the North Vietnamese in horrific conditions at the prison nicknamed the Hanoi Hilton and other locations. United States senator John McCain was held there, as was Admiral James Stockdale. Sledge had access to their entire classified debriefings so before he even met them he knew in great detail what these men had been through. Some had been held in tiny cells in solitary confinement for years; others were chained together. They were beaten and tortured, deprived of food and medical care.
When Sledge began talking to these men, he was startled by what he heard. âAt first I thought I had cotton in my ears or something. The things they told me didnât make much sense,â says Sledge. âThey had a hard time, they were clear about that. But so often they would say things like, âI kind of miss it. It was an intense experience. I learned a lot from it.â â
Sledge was no stranger to the idea that adversity can push a person to be stronger or more resilient. He grew up in the Deep South. His father was an attorney, so his family was relatively well-off, but the people he knew in his small town worked incredibly hard in very demanding circumstances. âThere was a lot of tragedy, death, illness, alcoholism,â he says. âThere was an idea that if you can get through lifeâs challenges with some grace and dignity, you would probably learn something from it. In my mind that wasnât a psychological issue; that was just human nature.â But the things these prisoners of war had survived were so harsh, he had a hard time understanding how these men could take away anything positive from the experience.
He wanted to conduct a study to learn more. The air force provided him with contacts for veterans who matched his POWs almost exactly in terms of age, rank, and time spent in Southeast Asia. The only difference was that these men had never been captured. They were a perfect control group against which he could compare the POWs.
In the fall of 1976 Sledge mailed both groups questionnaires that asked about the problems they had faced in captivity or during their tour of duty, problems they faced when they returned home, and any perceived benefits and perceived problems that arose from their wartime experience, among other things.
When the questionnaires were returned Sledge found support for everything these men had been telling him in their follow-up interviews. Sixty-one percent of the POWs indicated that they had undergone beneficial changes as a result of their captivity. Only 30 percent of the control group reported this. In addition, the POWs who were held the longest and received the harshest treatment were far more likely to report positive changes than those who were held for shorter periods of time. Those who reported...