1 From T. rex to Transylvanian
Naked Necks
PREHISTORY
The discovery in 1861 of the fossilized remains of the archaeopteryx first led palaeontologists to speculate that birds evolved from dinosaurs. The archaeopteryx, thought to have lived in Jurassic Bavaria around 147 million years ago, possessed rudimentary feathers and wings. We now know that other dinosaurs also grew feathers; some, like modern-day birds, were warm-blooded and hollow-boned. Advances in genetic research suggest that the ancestry of birds is much more closely and complexly connected to the carnivorous theropods than any other dinosaurs.1 The humble chicken may in fact be the nearest living relative of the largest and most notorious predatory dinosaur, Tyrannosaurus rex: in 2007 protein traces recovered from the soft tissue of a 68-million-year-old T. rex femur bone were observed to match most closely those of the Gallus (chicken) species.2
The direct ancestor of the chicken (the âpre-chickenâ) evolved somewhat later, probably around 50 million years ago. Fossils of Gallus are relatively scarce and have mainly been found in southern Europe. Fossil discoveries here imply that the ancestors of todayâs jungle fowl dispersed into warmer territories during periods of glaciation; when temperatures increased and glaciers retreated these subpopulations spread north and eventually reunited â the length of time apart resulting in the evolution of different species or subspecies. Evidence of prehistoric Gallus species surviving into historic Europe has not been found, possibly because these birds died out during subsequent glaciation or were made extinct by predators (including humans). Those species of jungle fowl we know today are therefore probably descended from prehistoric populations that took refuge during glaciation in what is now the region of South-East Asia. They would have been prevented from travelling north by the Himalayas, therefore evolving in relative isolation. Other Gallus subpopulations may have evolved in the Far East: there are archaeological signs of domesticated chickens in China several thousand years before their domestication in India. Moreover, domestic chicken breeds in Asia are sufficiently different from others to indicate separate evolutionary backgrounds.3
JUNGLE FOWL
The wild jungle fowl, from which the domestic chicken descends, belongs to the order Galliformes, suborder Galli, family Phasianidae (which also includes pheasants, partridges, peafowl, quail, francolins and monals). Subfamilies of Phasianidae are distinguished according to the manner of tail moulting. Chickens belong to the second subfamily (Phasianinae), in which moulting is centripetal (the pattern of tail-feather loss occurs from the outside to the centre).
Phasianids are generally territorial ground-dwelling non-migratory birds. They tend to have shortish wings, solid legs and short, strong beaks. Males are larger than females, possess spurs, and have brightly coloured plumage and facial ornaments such as wattles and combs. Hens are often described as drab in comparison, but their less eye-catching plumage camouflages them when they are nesting on the ground to incubate eggs. These birds are reasonably powerful short-range flyers, which allows speedier escape from predators and safer roosting in trees at dusk.
The four recognized species of modern wild jungle fowl include the red (Gallus gallus), the Sri Lanka (Gallusg. lafayetii), the green (Gallusg. varius) and the grey (Gallusg. sonneratii). Red, grey and Sri Lanka jungle fowl prefer tropical or subtropical forest habitats, while the green tends to live near the seashore or by scrubland bordering cultivated land. The grey inhabits western and southern India, while the Sri Lanka lives naturally only where its name suggests. The unusual green jungle fowl, found in Java and islands eastward, where it occupies different habitats from the red, is thought to be the most primitive of the four, boasting sixteen tail feathers and short hackle feathers, whereas the other species possess fourteen tail feathers and long pointed hackle feathers.
| Gallus gallus varius, the green jungle fowl; a hand-coloured lithograph from Daniel Giraud Elliot, A Monograph of the Phasianidae (Family of Pheasants) (1872). |
There are no subspecies of grey, green or Sri Lanka jungle fowl, but several subspecies of red jungle fowl exist: the Cochin-Chinese red (G. g. gallus), located in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and south Vietnam; the Indian red (G. g. murghi) of north and north-east India, Nepal and Bangladesh; the Burmese (G. g. spadiceus), found in south-west China, Myanmar, Malaysia, north Sumatra and Thailand (except in the east); the Javan red (G. g. bankiva), located in south Sumatra, Bali and Java; and the Tonkinese red (G. g. jabouillei) of south-west China and north Vietnam.4 These five distinct subspecies of red jungle fowl are unable to interbreed with each other but they are capable of successfully mating with domestic chickens.
Wild and domesticated red jungle fowl were introduced to Kenya, the Philippines and other Pacific islands in Micronesia, Melanesia and Polynesia (forced introductions to Australia, New Zealand and North America were not successful). Red jungle fowl were also brought to Hawaiâi around 700 years ago by colonizing Polynesians; today families of feral chickens can be seen roaming the streets, forests and even the beaches of Kauai.
| A wild rooster wandering among tourists on Poipu Beach, Kauai, Hawaiâi. |
DOMESTICATION
Domestication of the chicken is thought to have occurred around 8,000 to 10,000 years ago.5 Charles Darwin believed that the red jungle fowl of South-East Asia was the direct and single ancestor of the domestic chicken; but while modern genetic research verifies this speciesâ important role as a progenitor of domestic chickens (to the extent that G. g. domesticus is recognized as a subspecies of red jungle fowl, rather than a separate species),6 debate continues as to the involvement of multiple hereditary and geographical origins.7 Some scientists hypothesize several domestication events occurring independently across various regions in Southern Asia and involving inter-species hybridization within the genus Gallus. The theory of multiple progenitors is supported by the yellow leg and skin colour of many domestic chickens, which depends on a gene deriving not from the red jungle fowl but from the grey.8
The earliest remains of domestic chickens (distinguished from wild fowl remains by their larger skeletal size) are at least 7,500 years old and have been found in north-east China in sixteen Neolithic sites along Huang He (Yellow River), and in the Indus Valley in Pakistan. Chickens were most likely first taken north from their origins in South-East Asia to China, where they became established by 6000 BC. They were then transported eastwards, as shown by evidence of their presence in Russia, Turkey and eastern Europe around 3000 BC. The global transportation of chickens continued into Spain by 1200 BC and then to north-west Europe by 500 BC: the earliest records of domestic chickens in Britain can be dated to around 55 BC. It is presumed that chickens were introduced to North America around 1,600 years later.9
As early as 1500 BC depictions of chickens emerge in Egyptian hieroglyphic art. A rooster is visible in a scene in the tomb of Rekhmara (c. 1500 BC), and chicken symbolism has also been identified in Tutankhamenâs tomb (c. 1400 BC). Interestingly, chickens then disappear from North African graphic records until around 650 BC. Fourth-century Greek records state that Egyptians had mastered poultry husbandry and had been practising artificial incubation of chicks for many years. The giant incubators invented by the ancient Egyptians â possibly to sustain the masses of labourers involved in the construction of pyramids â were capable of hatching up to 15,000 eggs at one time. The eggs were warmed by fires and turned at regular intervals by attendants. The ancient Chinese also created incubators (using fires or rotting manure), perhaps to provide eggs for the builders of the Great Wall of China.10 Thus behind our most wondrous human monuments, it seems, there roosts the chicken.
In sub-Saharan Africa the earliest chicken remains â found in Mali, Nubia, the East African Coast and South Africa â have been dated to around AD 500, leading archaeologists to speculate that chickens came to Africa via the Nile Valley, or through early Graeco-Roman east coast trade.11
Similarly, the spread of jungle fowl from South-East Asia to the Mediterranean may have occurred via commercial (or military) contacts. The Indian practices of cockfighting and chicken husbandry (for meat and eggs) were probably passed on to the Persian invaders in 400 BC, who in turn transferred them to the Romans and Greeks. The Romans practised caponizing and force-feeding of chickens, and also knew about animal husbandry principles of âhybrid vigor [and] sperm competitionâ.12 They produced two dual-purpose breeds for entertainment (cockfighting) and food, and two other breeds used solely for competitive fighting.
| Terracotta bust of an ancient Greek deity holding a rooster and an egg, c. 370â350 BC. | |
The islands of the Pacific also have an ancient history involving chickens. In the eighteenth century James Cook noticed chickens on the Easter Islands, New Caledonia and elsewhere in the Pacific. The Tahitians claimed chickens were made at the same time as humans by the god Taarva and had always lived amongst them. Hawaiâians told Cook the legend of a gigantic bird who, upon settling on the water, laid an egg that opened to produce the island of Hawaiâi.
Debate continues over ...