J.Z. LaRocque: A MĂ©tis Historianâs Account of His Familyâs Experiences during the North-West Rebellion
of 1885
Heather Devine
Introduction
Between 1867 and 1885, the MĂ©tis and their First Nations allies were the only Indigenous groups in the country to openly defy the newly established Canadian government. Under Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald, the fledgling government set out to secure the vast region of Western Canada in order to establish its dominion sea to sea, and to keep the region from falling into American hands. The Canadian annexation of Western Canada began with the purchase of Rupertâs Land from the Hudsonâs Bay Company in 1869, a real estate transaction complicated by the refusal of the MĂ©tis people of Red River to allow their homeland to be sold. The MĂ©tis resistance to the actions of the Canadian government, which included the takeover of Fort Garry and the forced negotiation of land, religious, and language rights for the MĂ©tis, resulted in the creation of Manitoba. The eventual acquisition of the entire region of Rupertâs Land, followed by the negotiation and signing of a series of numbered treaties with the tribal groups in what is now Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, served to make these large areas of land available for agricultural settlement.
The governmentâs failure to deliver on promises of land tenure to the MĂ©tis, followed by its failure to keep its treaty promises to the Blackfoot and Cree people now on reserves, resulted in a short but bloody uprising known as the Northwest Rebellion of 1885.1 The revolt was successfully suppressed by the Canadian government, and the leader of the uprising, Louis Riel, was hanged for treason in November 1885. A series of changes to the Indian Act â most of them punitive â were made to prevent similar uprisings from taking place again. The MĂ©tis were issued scrip, a certificate payable to the bearer, for either agricultural land or cash, in recognition and extinguishment of their Aboriginal rights. Consequently, the remaining arable lands in the West were officially opened to agricultural settlement.
Life for the Métis after 1885 was difficult. Some of the Métis had troubles claiming and keeping their scrip, and by the turn of the twentieth century, these people were homeless, with no means of survival in the agricultural settlements that quickly sprang up. Some landless Métis chose to rely on hunting and gathering to survive, and soon migrated to isolated regions farther to the north and west where they could continue their traditional way of life.
But many of the Métis descendants of buffalo hunters and traders who had occupied the northern plains for generations chose to remain in the southern regions of Western Canada, despite widespread prejudice and discrimination due to their race, their religion, and their French and Indigenous languages. Moreover, the dominant historical narratives of the day branded the Métis as traitors to Canada, an impulsive, improvident, even violent people who had chosen to follow a madman.2
Between 1885 and 1914, an estimated three million people emigrated to Canada, and most of these immigrants were destined for Western Canada.3 The pressure to gain access to arable land soon resulted in widespread discrimination against anyone who was foreign or non-white, did not speak English as their mother tongue, or practised Roman Catholicism. The Indians on reserves were largely ignored by the white population, as the punitive policies of the Indian Act severely restricted their movements off the reserve.4
By the 1920s and 1930s, a new, pathological MĂ©tis identity had entered the public consciousness, largely due to the economic and social marginalization that had accelerated since the collapse of the world economy in 1929. The MĂ©tis (colloquially referred to as âhalf-breedsâ) were considered to be a failed people, whose racial and cultural characteristics rendered them unfit to compete successfully in the New West. Their lack of formal education made it difficult for them to get permanent employment, and for those MĂ©tis unfortunate enough to be indigent, there was no free access to medical services or schooling. They populated the ditches beside the major roads, and led a precarious existence based on seasonal farm labour, handouts, some hunting and gathering, and petty crime. The transformation of the once-proud MĂ©tis into âThe Road Allowance Peopleâ was complete â or almost complete.5
But there were other MĂ©tis who had avoided the fate of their less fortunate kin. It is often overlooked, or simply unacknowledged, that some MĂ©tis people had the resources necessary to weather the transition from a frontier to a settled society. These individuals, often part of officer families from the Hudsonâs Bay Company, or descended from the numerous families of independent traders in the region, had managed to establish small homesteads and secure title to their land. Some of these people also possessed a degree of formal education, and set out to adapt to the new economic reality forced upon them. Others had managed to establish kin and commercial relationships with the new arrivals, or maintained the remnants of older ties rooted in the fur trade society that once dominated the region. In order to function successfully in the racially charged, post-frontier environment of Western Canada, the âRespectable MĂ©tis,â as they were sometimes called, chose to downplay their mixed ancestry publicly.6 If they spoke Michif or Cree or Saulteaux or French, they did so at home, with their relatives and friends. Some also quietly chose not to pass along these languages to their children, as they were no longer considered useful skills. The beaded clothing, the kinnikinnick, and the buffalo guns were tucked away under beds, in boxes and trunks, and in closets. The songs and stories of the past remained in the minds and hearts of the old people, to be shared on special occasions like Le Jour DâAn (New Yearâs Day). Their children went to school, became adults, and intermarried with their non-MĂ©tis neighbors.
Over time, the external trappings of MĂ©tis culture and heritage had been suppressed so profoundly that by the late twentieth century, it appeared as if the diverse MĂ©tis communities scattered throughout the southern regions of Western Canada had completely vanished from the landscape.7 In fact, they had not. As interest in MĂ©tis culture and heritage grew after the centenaries of the 1869 and 1885 MĂ©tis uprisings, a new generation of researchers would revisit the historical documents of the nineteenth century, looking for information that would shed light on the lives of previously neglected racial and gender minorities, and provide usable data for the political and legal battles following the patriation of Canadaâs Constitution in 1982.8
Across Western Canada and into the northern United States, various cultural organizations and projects were launched to compile and preserve MĂ©tis folklore and music.9 But what also emerged was a large body of both published and unpublished work, some written by MĂ©tis people themselves, some written by people who lived and worked alongside the MĂ©tis. These published works were not in the form of school textbooks or scholarly, âacademicâ histories. Instead they thrived in a largely neglected genre of literature â the field of vernacular history.10
Vernacular history: A definition
What is vernacular history? Recent scholarship by Western Canadian historian Lyle Dick sets out to introduce the term âvernacular history,â to define the characteristics of this genre, and to provide a framework for examining non-academic sources of historical information in order that they might take their rightful place within a broader, more inclusive conception of what academics define as âhistoriography.â11
The origin of the term âvernacular historyâ is partially rooted in existing definitions of âvernacular literatureâ and âvernacular architecture.â Vernacular literature, by and large, refers to any literature written in the everyday speech of the common people. In terms of European literature, vernacular literature was any written work that was not expressed in Latin. Vernacular architecture is the term used to describe buildings that are built using local, traditional techniques and materials, and are not designed by professional architects.
The term âvernacular historyâ as discussed by Lyle Dick, is âgrassroots historical practice in North America in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.â12 Like vernacular literature and vernacular architecture, vernacular history is a product of the common people, in that it tends to be composed of information collected from, and compiled by, citizens of local communities.
Vernacular historians have ranged from community historians to individual scholars to so-called history buffs, and their practice has assumed many forms, from informal pioneer reminiscences to highly crafted works of scholarship, exemplifying varying levels of talent, experience, and imagination.13
The authors of these grassroots histories may incorporate information from secondary historical sources produced elsewhere but tend to rely on their own personal experiences; original documents and interviews; creative works, such as spoken word, music poetry and visual art; and objects and ephemera collected directly from community residents.
Vernacular histories may follow some research and publication conventions, such as the third-person style of writing, citation of sources, or even formal consent forms for inclusion of personal information, but this is not always deemed necessary, or even desired, by its practitioners.
One of the major criticisms of vernacular history is that it may not display the much-vaunted objectivity of academic writing:
Vernacular authors have often not displayed scholarly detachment; their writing has tended to be informed by direct experience and animated by a passionate involvement with their subjects of study.14
Another shortcoming of vernacular narratives, according to Dick, is that they are âdialogicâ in the Bahktinian sense, in that the narrative may change over time according to the nature of the audience and their interaction with, and response to, the authorâs account. This fluidity of content in some vernacular accounts means that they lack logical coherence, which undermines their credibility as trustworthy sources of information.15
During the course of the twentieth century, historical production became a discrete academic specialty, and history as written by professional scholars was privileged over vernacular history in terms of its overall validity and credibility. As a result, vernacular history became marginalized and eventually discredited as a source of reliable information about the past.16
Dick goes on to note that while vernacular historians âshare the common experience of operating outside dominant discourses of power and authority,â this does not mean that vernacular narratives necessarily go against the prevailing dominant historical viewpoints.17 Community historians who share the same worldview and value systems as professional scholars are often happy to incorporate perspectives that reinforce their own opinions, even to the point of excluding credible data that challenge the validity of the prevailing historical scholarship. As a result, the vast majority of local community histories produced prior to the 1970s demonstrate a relentlessly homogeneous portrait of Western Canada, where the narrative of the past starts with the appearance of the first homesteader and goes on to feature the family biographies of subsequent arrivals â all presented in alphabetical order according to surname.
More recently Lyle Dick has revisited the topic of Western Canadian vernacular history, this time focusing on the writing of early Manitoba history. His rationale for this examination is to refute the common assumption that Western Canadian historiography is a product of the period after the creation of Manitoba and after the founding of history as an academic specialty. Instead, he argues that there were vernacular h...