PART 1
Problems
Chapter 1
Sets, measure and probability
1.1 Notes
Logic
If p, q denote propostions then
¬p denotes the proposition “not p”;
p ∧ q denotes the proposition “p and q”;
p ∨ q denotes the proposition “p or q”;
p ⇒ q denotes the proposition “p implies q”;
p ⇔ q denotes the proposition “p implies q and q implies p”;
(∀x)(p) denotes the proposition “for all x, p is true”;
(∃x)(p) denotes the proposition “there exists an x such that p is true”.
Sets
x ∈ A: x belongs to the set A; x is an element of the set A
x ∉ A: x is not an element of the set A
A ⊂ B: A is a subset of B; x ∈ A ⇒ x ∈ B
A = B: A ⊂ B and B ⊂ A; x ∈ A ⇔ x ∈ B
A ∪ B = {x : x ∈ A or x ∈ B}
A ∩ B = {x : x ∈ A and x ∈ B}
A′ = {x : x ∉ A}
A \ B = A ∩ B′
A ∆ B = (A ∩ B′) ∪ (B ∩ A′)
Commutative laws:
(A ∩ B) = (B ∩ A)
(A ∪ B) = (B ∪ A)
Associative laws :
(A ∩ B) ∩ C = A ∩ (B ∩ C) = A ∩ B ∩ C
(A ∪ B) ∪ C = A ∪ (B ∪ C) = A ∪ B ∪ C
Distributive laws :
(A ∩ B) ∪ C = (A ∪ C) ∩ (B ∪ C)
(A ∪ B) ∩ C = (A ∩ C) ∪ (B ∩ C)
Complementation laws:
(A ∪ A′) = Ω (where Ω denotes some universal set)
De Morgan’s laws :
(A ∩ B)′ = (A′ ∪ B′)
(A ∪ B)′ = (A′ ∩ B′)
Measure and probability
We begin with the definition of a σ-algebra of sets.
Definition 1.1 Let Ω be a set and
be a set of subsets of Ω. Then
is a σ-algebra if
We now define a probability measure.
Definition 1.2 Let Ω be a set and
be a σ-algebra of subsets of Ω. The function
P :
→ [0,1] is a probability measure if
Finally we define a probability space.
Definition 1.3 Let Ω be a set,
be a σ-algebra of subsets of Ω and
P :
→ [0,1] be a probability measure. Then we say that
• (Ω,
,
P) is a probability space,
• the set Ω is called the sample space, and,
• elements of
are called events.
The next definition sets the stage for exploring relations between events.
Definition 1.4 Let (Ω,
,
P) be a probability space, and let
A and
B be events. We say that
A and
B are independent events if
P(A ∩ B)= P(A)P(B).
1.2 Problems
(1) Suppose that A, B, C are 3 distinct subsets of Ω. We can construct other distinct subsets of Ω from these 3 subsets using the only the operations ∩ and ∪ repeatedly: A, B, C, A ∩ B, (A ∩ B) ∪ C etc. We say that 2 subsets are different if they are not necessarily equal to each other. For example, A ∩ B is different from A ∩ C, but (A ∩ B) ∪ C is not different from (A ∪ C) ∩ (B ∪ C).
According to Rényi [54, p.26] there are 18 different subsets that can be constructed in this way having started with n = 3 distinct subsets A, B, C. Indeed,
• if n = 2, we could create 4 different subsets;
• if n = 3, we could create 18 different subsets;
• if n = 4, we could...