Chapter 1
From Kepler to Schrödinger... and Beyond
Summary. The mathematical structure underlying Newtonian mechanics is symplectic geometry, which contains a classical form of Heisenbergâs uncertainty principle. Quantum mechanics is based on de Broglieâs theory of matter waves, whose evolution is governed by Schrödingerâs equation. The latter emerges mathematically from classical mechanics using the metaplectic representation of the symplectic group.
The purpose of this introductory Chapter is to present the basics of both classical and quantum physics âin a nutshellâ. Much of the material will be further discussed and developed in the forthcoming Chapters.
The three first sections of this Chapter are devoted to a review of the essentials of Newtonian mechanics, in its Hamiltonian formulation. This will allow us to introduce the reader to one of the recurrent themes of this book, which is the âsymplectizationâ of mechanics. The remainder of the Chapter is devoted to a review of quantum mechanics, with an emphasis on its Bohmian formulation. We also briefly discuss two topics which will be developed in this book: the metaplectic representation of the symplectic group, and the non-squeezing result of Gromov, which leads to a topological form of Heisenbergâs inequalities.
It is indeed a discouraging (and perilous!) task to try give a bibliography for the topics reviewed in this Chapter, because of the immensity of the available literature. I have therefore decided to only list a few selected references; no doubt that some readers will felicitate me for my good taste, and that the majority probably will curse me for my omissions âand my ignorance!
The reader will note that I have added some historical data. However, this book is not an obituary: only the dates of birth of the mentioned scholars are indicated. These scientists, who have shown us the way, are eternal because they live for us today, and will live for us in time to come, in their great findings, their papers and books.
1.1Classical Mechanics
I will triumph over mankind by the honest confession that I have stolen the golden vases of the Egyptians to build up a tabernacle for my God far away from the confines of Egypt. If you forgive me, I rejoice; if you are angry, I can bear it; the dice is cast, the book is written either for my contemporaries, or for posterity. I care not which; I can wait a hundred years for a Reader when God has waited six thousand years for a witness (Johannes Kepler).
Johannes Kepler (b.1571) had to wait for less than hundred years for recognition: in 1687, Sir Isaac Newton (b.1643) published Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Newtonâs work had of course forerunners, as has every work in Science, and he acknowledged this in his famous sentence:
âIf I have been able to see further, it was because I stood on the shoulders of Giants.â
These Giants were Kepler, on one side, and Nicolas Copernicus (b.1473) and Galileo Galilei (b.1564) on the other side. While Galilei studied motions on Earth (reputedly by dropping objects from the Leaning Tower of Pisa), Kepler used the earlier extremely accurate ânaked eyed!â observations of his master, the astronomer Tycho Brahe (b.1546), to derive his celebrated laws on planetary motion. It is almost certain that Keplerâs work actually had a great influence on Newtonâs theory; what actually prevented Kepler from discovering the mathematical laws of gravitation was his ignorance of the operation of differentiation, which was invented by Newton himself, and probably simultaneously, by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (b.1646). It is however noteworthy that Kepler knew how to âintegrateâ, as is witnessed in his work Astronomia Nova (1609): one can say (with hindsight!) that the calculations Kepler did to establish his Area Law involved a numerical technique that is reminiscent of integration (see Schempp [136] for an interesting account of the âKeplerian strategyâ).
1.1.1Newtonâs Laws and Machâs Principle
Newtonâs Principia (a paradigm of the exact Sciences, often considered as being the best scientific work ever written) contained the results of Newtonâs investigations and thoughts about Celestial Mechanics, and culminated in the statement of the laws of gravitation. Newton has often been dubbed the âfirst physicistâ; the Principia were in fact the act of birth of Classical Mechanics. As Newton himself put it:
âThe laws which we have explained abundantly serve to account for all the motions of the celestial bodies, and of our sea.â
We begin by recalling Newtonâs laws, almost as Newton himself stated them:
Newtonâs First law: a body remains in rest âor in uniform motionâ as long as no external forces act to change that state.
This is popularly known as âNewtonâs law of inertiaâ. A reference frame where it holds is called an inertial frame. Newtonâs First Law may seem âobviousâ to us today, but it was really a novelty at Newtonâs time where one still believed that motion ceased with the cause of motion! Newtonâs First Law moreover contains in germ a deep question about the identification between âinertialâ and âgravitationalâ mass.
Newtonâs Second law: the change in momentum of a body is proportional to the force that acts on the body, and takes place in the direction of that external force.
This is perhaps the most famous of Newtonâs laws. It was rephrased by Kirchhoff in the well-known (and somewhat unfortunate!) form âForce equals mass times accelerationâ.
Newtonâs Third law: if a given body acts on a second body with a force, then the latter will act on the first with a force equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction.
This is of course the familiar law of âaction and reactionâ: when you exert a push on a rigid wall, it âpushes you backâ with...