Chapter 1
Utility Theory
This chapter derives asset prices in a one-period model. We derive a version of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) using a complete market, state-contingent claims approach. We define the forward pricing kernel and then use the assumption of joint normality of the cash flows and Steinâs lemma to establish the CAPM. We then derive the pricing kernel in an equilibrium representative investor model. But first, we need to understand a few properties of utility function.
A common utility function we use in economics/finance is the power utility. Its functional form is:
This may seem a strange choice for a utility functional form, but it is actually a very clever one. The ArrowâPratt measures of (absolute and relative) risk aversion (RA) are
and
By the assumption of a risk averse investor, U(W) is increasing and strictly concave
The inverse of RA â
is also known as risk tolerance.
Using the power utility function, we get Uâ˛(W) = WâÎł and Uâ˛â˛(W) = âÎłWâÎłâ1. Therefore, the ArrowâPratt measure of Relative Risk Aversion (RRA) under power utility is RRA = Îł. If Îł > 0, then the agent is risk averse. If Îł < 0, we would call her risk seeker (or lover). To satisfy the second common assumption of concavity, we need Îł > 0. In other words, power utility function with Îł > 0 refers to an investor with RRA that is independent of her level of wealth, which is why it is also called the constant RRA utility function.
In the case where Îł = 1 we get a special utility function, called the logarithmic function, U(W) = log(W). You can see that by taking the limit
after applying lâ HĂ´pitalâs rule. Essentially, log utility function is a CRRA utility function with RRA = 1.
Another commonly used utility function is the negative exponential utility
so ARA = Ρ and RRA = ΡW. This is why this utility function is called the Constant Absolute Relative Risk Aversion (CARA) utility function. For an investor to be risk averse, we would require Ρ > 0.
Finally, a linear utility function of the form U(W) = a + bW, corresponds to a risk-neutral investor. Why? Because Uâ˛(W) = b and Uâ˛â˛(W) = 0. In other words, the function is not concave (obviously, since it is linear in W) and the ArrowâPratt measures of risk aversion are ARA = RRA = 0.
1.1Risk Aversion and Certainty Equivalent
For a given utility function U(â
) and uncertain terminal wealth W, we can write W in terms of its certainty equivalent Wc as follows:
The term ârisk averseâ as applied to investors with strictly concave utility functions is descriptive in the sense that thecertainty-equivalent end-of-period wealth is always less than the expected value E(W) of the associated portfolio for all such investors. The proof follows from Jensenâs inequality: if U is strictly concave, then
The smaller the Wc, the more risk averse is the investor.
An investor is said to be more risk averse than a second investor if, for every portfolio, the certainty-equivalent end-of-period wealth for the first investor is less than or equal to the certainty equivalent end-of-period wealth associated with the same portfolio for the second investor. This statement is always true disregarding the shape of the risky return distribution and the order of risk preference.
Chapter 2
Pricing Kernel and Stochastic Discount Factor
2.1ArrowâDebreu State Prices
We assume that there are a finite number of states of the world at time t+T, indexed by i = 1, 2, . . . , I, each with a positive probability of occurring. Let pi be the probability of state i occurring. A state-contingent claim on state i is defined as a security which pays $1 if and only if state i occurs.
We now assume that markets are complete. Specifically, we assume that it is possible to buy a state-contingent claim with a forward price qi for state i. In complete markets, the qi prices exist, for all states i. It follows that an asset j, which has a t...