Part I Concepts of Giftedness and
Identification: Social and Emotional Needs
Introduction
Dorothy A. Sisk
Researchers are still struggling to generate appropriate definitions and
theories of giftedness in students and adults. This section addresses this
struggle in the first chapter by Robert J. Sternberg, ‘Is Gifted
Education on the Right Path?', in which he proposes his model Active
Concerned Citizenship and Ethical Leadership (ACCEL) for identifying and
developing giftedness. Sternberg stresses there is more to giftedness than
intelligence. His model ACCEL can be used to develop transformational
leadership to address real-world problems for a common good. Sternberg
identifies skills needed for transformational leadership as analytical,
creative, practical and wisdom-based ethical skills. In Chapter 2 Dorothy A.
Sisk expands the definition of gifted to include spiritual intelligence. She
shares the development of the theory of Spiritual Intelligence proposed by
Sisk and E. Paul Torrance in their book Spiritual Intelligence:
Developing Higher Consciousness (2001). Spiritual
intelligence is defined as the capacity to use multi-sensory
approaches including intuition, meditation and visualization to tap inner
knowledge to solve problems of a global nature. Sisk views spiritual
intelligence as having the capacity to integrate the multiple intelligences
to solve global problems, and she agrees with Sternberg that real-world
problems be addressed for a common good. In Chapter 3 ‘Exchanging
Giftedness for a Better Gift’ Janet Davidson uses the literature of
‘gift giving’ to explore issues of identification and
definition of giftedness. She suggests that we analyze our motivation for
bestowing the designation of giftedness, and questions viewing gifted
individuals as a national resource. Davidson recommends adapting a
developmentally and focused definition of giftedness that is domain specific
and includes psychosocial variables.
As our global world continues to become more and more multicultural, there is
the issue of equity and the under-representation of culturally and
linguistically different gifted students. This issue is addressed in Chapter
4, ‘Tapping the Untapped – Untold Stories: Revisiting the
Concept of Giftedness Through the Mirror of Multi-Cultural India’ by
Krishna Maitra and Yukti Sharma. They propose that we address the questions
of ‘Where is Giftedness?’ and ‘In What Form?’
and explore the potentiality of giftedness as a construct that is responsive
to the micro stories that different cultures create. This process could
yield a multicultural education that would include the social, cultural and
economic needs of students. This issue of access and equity is also
addressed in Chapter 5, ‘Honoring Differences: Improving the
Representation of Culturally Different Gifted Students Based on
Equity’ by Donna Ford, Ramon Goings, Jemimah Young and Brian Wright.
They call for this issue to become a top priority of educators and policy
makers. They suggest a number of solutions, including involving parents,
making multicultural education available for educators, hiring more teachers
of color, using culturally responsive tests and materials, setting equity
goals, and implementing culturally based definitions, theories and
philosophies.
The relationship between creativity and genius has intrigued researchers and
educators over the years, and Chapter 6, ‘Creativity and
Genius’ by Dean Keith Simonton, addresses this question and discusses
creativity and genius as manifestations of giftedness. He says formal
education can prove irrelevant to creative development and the emergence of
genius. However, even though creativity cannot be inculcated, it can be
encouraged in a supportive environment in which creative potential can be
realized, and students are encouraged to be open to new experiences. Equally
important to the development of creative potential is the need and demand
for instruments to detect creative potential that have up-to-date scoring
systems.
In Chapter 7, ‘Why Bother Being Different?', Kelsey Procter
Finley and Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi explore the role of intrinsic motivation
in excellence. This chapter discusses impediments to excellence and focuses
on the psychological states and traits that are associated with intrinsic
motivation that helps individuals persevere through external impediments to
excellence, utilizing interviews conducted with highly creative individuals
over a 20-year period.
In Chapter 8, ‘New Dynamic Approach to Measure Creativity:
Implications for Identification and Education', Taisir Subhi Yamin
introduces his new battery called Evaluation of Potential Creativity (EPoC).
It is a multivariate approach using the definition of creative process of
Sandra Linke. She defines the creative process as a breakthrough discovery
in any domain that causes a paradigm shift in a field.
There is increasing interest in atypical gifted learners, who are described
generally as consisting of ethnic, racial and linguistic minorities, the
economically disadvantaged, gifted females, twice-exceptional gifted,the
gifted student with disabilities, the sexually/gender diverse, and the
profoundly gifted. Intragroup characteristics of atypical gifted students
need to be addressed as well as intergroup characteristics. In Chapter 9,
‘Profoundly Gifted: Outliers Among the Outliers’ by Stephanie
S. Tolan, the profoundly gifted are described as a minority within a
minority, with faster, wider-ranging, more intense and active mental
processing affecting the child's experience of the world from birth
onwards. These children are ‘out of sync', and addressing
their genius potential requires a range of suitable educational strategies
to meet their idiosyncratic needs. Tolan states that we need to provide them
with the challenge and support they seek and get out of the way. Chapter 10,
‘Eminence in Talented Women by Domain: Issues, Similarities and
Differences Utilizing the Piirto Pyramid as a Theoretical Framework’
by Jane Piirto discusses female talent in six domains. In visual arts,
creative writing, science, acting, music and dance Piirto shares
biographical sketches in which she
found gender discrimination rife across all domains. She concludes that
women battle environmental forces to rise to eminence. One area of gifted
education that has shown considerable growth in both awareness and
programming is that of the gifted child who is twice exceptional. In Chapter
11, ‘Accepting Exceptionality: Giftedness and ADHD’ by Kelly
Lee and Richard Olenchak, they discuss the overlap of giftedness with ADHD
and point out that the traits of giftedness and talent can easily be
confused with those of ADHD. In addition, they identify barriers to the
measurement of twice-exceptional students, such as that the two diagnoses
can mask each other or downplay certain characteristics. Twice-exceptional
children are also discussed in Chapter 12 by Linda Kreger Silverman in
‘Hidden Treasures: Twice Exceptional Students'. Silverman
points out that it seems paradoxical to think that a child can be gifted and
learning disabled at the same time; yet, they can exhibit the high
intelligence and personality characteristics of gifted without the school
achievement. Silverman stresses that classroom accommodations for these
struggling 2e students can yield surprising success, and most of all 2e
students thrive on relationships with caring teachers who see their gifts
and teach to their strengths. Chapter 13 ‘Serving and Honoring Gender
Diversity in Education’ by Robert Seney shares the progress that has
been made in accepting the sexually/gender diverse student. Students who are
gifted gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and questioning (GLBTQ) continue
to be plagued by verbal harassment and physical abuse. Seney suggests that
prominent GLBTQ adults be identified to serve as role models for gifted
students and identification models for educators.
Over the years there has been considerable interest in the emotional
development of gifted children and adults, and a need for empirical
longitudinal studies. Chapter 14, ‘The Emotional Development of the
Gifted and Talented’ by Joan Freeman serves to respond to this need.
Freeman carried out a 35-year study on the long-term emotional effects of
being gifted. She found that emotional problems among the participants in
her study were due to specific challenges such as unrealistic expectations
from others, grade skipping and family conflict. She noted that gifted and
talented children have special emotional needs, notably exposure to the
stimulation of like minds of their own age, honest communication, the
opportunity to follow their interests, and acceptance as children. Along
with the interest in emotional development, there has been concern over the
friendships of gifted students and the gifted have often been viewed as
loners.
In Chapter 15, ‘Friendships of Gifted Children and Youth: Updated
Insights and Understanding’ by Bruce Shore, Tanya Chichekian, Petra
Gyles and Cheryl Walker the authors refute this notion. They found in their
research that the number of friends of gifted students increased at
university, and social-emotional contributions were most often cited as the
foundations of their friendships. One pillar on which gifted friendships
were developed was competing for fun. The authors suggest that the rhetoric
about gifted friendships changes from difficulty and challenge to
differences in patterns and priorities. Perfectionism has been listed as a
characteristic of gifted students by many researchers and educators, and
Chapter l6 ‘Parental Influence on Perfectionism among Chinese Gifted
Children in Hong Kong’ by Lai Kwan Chan discusses perfectionism in
gifted children. She found that parenting styles or the practices of fathers
and mothers did influence the development of perfectionism. She suggests an
emphasis be placed on positive and effective parenting by educators and
counselors to provide insight to parents on supporting their gifted
children.
Reference
Sisk, D.A.
and Torrance,
E. P. (2001). Spiritual Intelligence: Developing Higher
Consciousness. Buffalo,
NY: Creative Ed.
Press.
1 Is Gifted Education on the Right Path?
Robert J. Sternberg*
Introduction
Humans place themselves at the top of the evolutionary scale, whatever “the top of the evolutionary scale” happens to mean. Human attitudes toward their place in the universe are captured well by Lovejoy (1960), in his classic work, The Great Chain of Being. The general idea, which dates back to Plato and Aristotle, is that there is a Great Chain of Being, comprising, among other entities, God at the top, then humankind, and then successively lower animals. At the top of the Earthly beings are humans.
Unfortunately, perhaps, the logic of the Great Chain of Being has been extended by us humans not only across species but within-species. For example, Westerners have viewed different cultures or races of people as occupying differentially elevated and privileged positions on the Great Chain (Sternberg, 2004a; Sternberg, Grigorenko, & Kidd, 2005). Many eminent behavioral scientists, including Sir Francis Galton and Raymond Cattell, believed in some variant of the Great Chain (see https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/raymond-cattell). Moreover, traditional cross-cultural psychological studies of human intelligence involved (and still involve today) translating Euro-centric intelligence tests, such as the Wechsler intelligence scales, and then administering them to individuals in other cultures (e.g., Georgas, Weiss, Van de Vijver, & Saklofske, 2003).
But in the field of cultural studies of human intelligence, progress has be...