Chapter 1
FROM THE âWOMANâS BIBLEâ TO THE âWOMENâS BIBLEâ: THE HISTORY OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO THE HEBREW BIBLE
The history of women interpreting biblical literature is not well known, neither in the academic field of biblical studies nor among lay people. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the Bible by women is not new but grounded in a centuries-long tradition. Indeed, as long as women have lived in Bible-dominated societies and participated in the religious life of Christianity and Judaism, they actively and independently read biblical texts. Many, it is true, were the recipients of biblical meanings as handed down and interpreted by androcentric institutions such as church and synagogue, and it was often dangerous for women to speak publicly in front of women and men. Yet alongside this baleful tradition was an alternative experience: again and again, women of high intellect, great independence, and strong conviction challenged male political and religious leaders to accept womenâs equality with men not only before God but also in society. By raising their voices, these women, often situated in religious orders and in the upper class, tried to defeat entrenched structures of sexism and misogyny. Sometimes, especially when they came from the underprivileged strata of their society, these lone voices connected the discrimination of women with other structures of oppression, such as racism, and demanded to abolish them.
This chapter traces the emergence and developments of feminist Hebrew Bible studies. It begins with a cursory survey on the proto-feminist era of women reading the Bible since the Western Middle Ages. It then outlines developments in the nineteenth century with a focus on the U.S.âAmerican scene. It continues with a discussion of the cultural-political situation in the early to mid-twentieth century, during which a number of books on women in the Bible were published. It then discusses comprehensively the emergence and diversification of feminist studies in the Hebrew Bible since the Second Feminist Movement in the 1970s through the early twenty-first century.
âIn the Image of Godâ: Individual Womenâs Voices in Western Societies from the Middle Ages to the Nineteenth Century
Biblical interpretations of individual medieval women never gained much influence in the religious institutions and societies of their times and remained on the margins of intellectual, religious, and social discourses and practices. Bold, courageous, and outspoken women came and went, and they were quickly forgotten when they passed away. Each woman believed that she reinvented the arguments, but one after another claimed her right to read and to interpret the meaning of biblical literature. We only have knowledge of a few, usually of those who published their work. Many others who were unable to write or publish their views remain unknown, although such women probably existed.1 Indeed, women have always participated at the grassroots level in the interpretative process, and so it seems likely that the next generation will continue holding on to their Bibles. It is therefore crucial to remember the many women who created biblical meanings in opposition to androcentric theories and practices prevalent in their lives. Their voices and insights will surely inspire their daughters and granddaughters to do the same.
Before the first feminist movement in Western societies during the nineteenth century, which brought about the first systematic wave of women struggling for equal political, economic, social, and religious rights, women interpret the Bible independently and in isolation from each other. They follow their conviction that women are not second-class citizens, and they read biblical texts in support of womenâs equality in society and before God. For instance, the twelfth-century Christian mystic Hildegard von Bingen repeatedly emphasizes the significance of Genesis 1:26-7. This verse introduces the notion of female and male as created in the image of God and does not limit any aspect of the imago Dei to women, as Bingenâs contemporary male medieval colleagues maintain. They accord the full imago Dei in terms of memory, intelligence, and will (memoria, intelligentia, voluntas) only to men and deny women the capacity of intelligence. Bingen does not accept this view and defends women as fully created in the image of God.2 Her inner conviction of womenâs equality characterizes her interpretation of Genesis 1:26-7 and she criticizes the androcentric status quo of her time in which women are considered as lesser human beings than men. Yet her position that the biblical text asserts womenâs full and equal inclusion in Godâs creation is an isolated phenomenon and does not enjoy the support of a whole movement pushing for change.
Hildegard von Bingen, however, was not alone in her belief in womenâs equality. Later on, fourteenth-century Christian writer, Christine de Pizan, defends womenâs equality on the basis of Genesis 1â2. She maintains that woman, like man, is not only created in Godâs image but also consists of much better material than man. Woman is taken from human flesh whereas man is made from soil. Moreover, the location of womanâs creation is better than manâs. Woman was created in paradise, de Pizan argues, and as a result her noble nature is guaranteed by God.3 De Pizan regards the first woman as Godâs masterpiece because she appears last in the creation process in Genesis 2. Woman thus is the culmination of divine creation, a conviction that later feminist readers repeat.
Other proto-feminist interpreters who affirm womenâs equality before God and in society are the medieval mystics Mechthild of Magdeburg, Gertrud von Hackeborn, and Gertrud the Great, the fifteenth-century Italian Isotta Nogarola, the seventeenth-century radical Italian nun Arcangela Tarabotti, the early seventeenth-century interpreters Lucretia Marinella and Suzanne de Nervèze, the seventeenth-century founder of Quakerism, George Fox, as well as his wife, Margaret Askew Fell Fox; the eighteenth-century sisters Sarah and Angelina Grimkè, the early nineteenth-century Lucretia Coffin Mott and AfricanâAmerican abolitionist and womenâs rights activist Sojourner Truth. They and many others find full equality of women inscribed in the biblical text in a time when women do not even have the right to public speech. Their courageous and bold individual voices challenge androcentric primacy, and eventually their efforts lead to a full choir in the nineteenth century, when a systematic approach to the Christian canon of the Bible is published for the first time in the Western history of interpretation.
âInspired by Mrs Godâ: Nineteenth-Century Womenâs Voices of the First Womenâs Movement in Western Societies
During the nineteenth century many women, black and white, U.S.âAmerican and European, lifted their voices against male-dominated patriarchal structures of oppression in Western societies. Known as the suffrage movement, this socio-political effort found success in the early decades of the twentieth century, although most of the suffragettes did not live long enough to enjoy the fruits of their persistent labor, determined patience, and unwavering commitment to womenâs rights. Their names are many although some of them have been lost to the vagaries of time and history. Yet those whom we know are now famous, and women owe them a great deal. U.S.âAmerican women devoting their working lives to womenâs rights include Marie W. Miller Stewart, Anna Julia Cooper, Sojourner Truth, Antoinette L. Brown Blackwell, Susan B. Anthony, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. All of them read the Bible against the status quo of patriarchal order and social hierarchies. While AfricanâAmerican women combined the problem of sexism with a call to abolish slavery and racism, white women emphasized womenâs lack of civil rights and did not always confront the complexities of racism and class oppression.4
Most renowned among those women is Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who has been severely criticized for ignoring issues of racism during her lifetime.5 The editor of The Womanâs Bible (1895 and 1898),6 Stanton asked other qualified women from the United States and Europe to contribute to a critical examination of the Bible. At the time she is over eighty years old and spent her entire life fighting for womenâs right to vote. She insists that religion and more specifically the interpretation of the Bible are the crucial reasons for her lack of success. She considers the Bible as the original cause of womenâs oppression, and is convinced that only a systematic study of the oppressive biblical passages would dismantle the sexist forces in society and lead to womenâs equality. She also wants to dispel womenâs attraction to religion by exposing its deep complicity in androcentric domination. Stanton is a radical feminist, and the older she becomes the more radical she turns. She also views women as complicit in their lack of rights and their religiosity as nurturing this compl...