Part One
Biblical and Theological
1
Hebrews as a Model for Expository Pastoral Preaching
Philip Greenslade
The scholarly consensus is that the Letter to the Hebrews might be re-titled the Sermon to the Hebrews. When we hear Hebrews we are exposing ourselves to early Christian preaching. Hebrews is the nearest we get to an example of first-century preaching. Of particular interest here is the authorâs own description of what he has been attempting to do: âI appeal to you, brothers, bear with my word of exhortation, for I have written to you brieflyâ (Heb 13:22).
We might demur over âbriefly,â but what attracts serious attention is the phrase tou logou tÄs paraklÄseĹsââthe word (or message) of exhortation (or comfort).â This phrase appears to be a technical name for a sermon preached in a synagogue. The phrase occurs at Acts 13:14â15 where Paul and Barnabas are invited to give logos tÄs paraklÄseĹs to the congregation in Pisidian Antioch:
In this synagogue context there is an expectation of hearing the word of the Lord derived apparently from an exposition of the lectionary readings drawn from the law and the prophets (Acts 13:15a; see Luke 4:16â21). This is precisely what Paul goes on to offer, in his presentation of Christ as the fulfillment of law and the prophets, and as the climactic chapter of the story. The âword of encouragementâ is nothing less than the âmessage of salvationâ (Acts 13:26). The sequel is instructive in suggesting that the language of gospel preaching can easily morph into âword of Godâ (Acts 13:34; 13:46) and âword of the Lordâ terminology (Acts 13:48â49). This is in line with earlier incidents of âword of Godâ (Acts 13:5â7) and âteaching about the Lordâ (Acts 13:12)âa conflation that is typical of Hebrews.
Our working hypothesis then is that Hebrews is a situation-specific sermon, or series of sermons, of an expository kind, sent as a letter to address the traumas of certain Jewish Christians, probably in Rome at or after the Neronic persecution, who were feeling under pressure to draw back from full commitment to Jesus and needed a bracing challenge and strong reassurance.
We may draw attention to some features of oral performance in Hebrews by noticing first the signs of speech rather than writing.
Take, for example, the phrases âof which we are speakingâ and âit has been testified somewhereâ (Heb 2:5â6). These suggest that at this point the preacher can assume knowledge on the part of his audience or, perhaps, does not want to get side-tracked into a discussion of psalm authorship.
And what of his comment, âAbout this we have much to say, and it is hard to explain?â (Heb 5:11). Here he seems to be getting his retaliation in first while in the same breath highlighting the seriousness of what he is teaching.
When he says, âSince you have become hard of hearingâ (Heb 5:11), we suspect the preacher is needing to wake his audience up by shouting louder or banging on the pulpit! His words, âthough we speak in this wayâ (Heb 6:9) or ânow the point of what we are saying is thisâ (8:1) sound like a classic mid-sermon summary of the main burden of the message.
As for remarks such as âof these things we cannot now speak in detailâ (Heb 9:5) or âwhat more shall I say?â (Heb 11:32), they seem to invite the response, âTell it preacher, tell it all.â Though âtime would fail me to tell . . .â sounds too much like a typical preacherâs complaint!
All the way through, we can hear the pastoral voice making its appeal to those who are âbrothersâ and âbelovedâ (e.g., Heb 3:12; 6:9).
âHebrews,â says Tom Long, âlike all good sermons, is a dialogical event in a monological format.â It may be worth recalling, at this juncture, Aristotleâs threefold rhetorical analysis which measured oratory in three ways: by logos (word), by pathos (emotion), and by ethos (character).
As far as Hebrews is concerned, the logos of his exhortation is the entire storyline of salvation, climaxing in Godâs final word and perfected work in his Son, Jesus Christ.
As for pathos, the preacher to the Hebrews exploits every emotional approach to elicit a response. He appeals, provokes, cajoles, invites, warns, celebrates, and reassures. He seeks to arouse both confidence (Heb 4:18; 10:19), and fear (Heb 4:1), urging his listeners/ readers, as it were, to âfear God rather than men,â not in craven terror (Heb 12:21) but, nonetheless, with healthy reverence and aweâ (Heb 12:28). Paradoxically, he invokes the specter of shameâthe possible disgrace of not disregarding the dishonor heaped upon them (Heb 10:36â39)âseeking, as it were, to shame them into being unashamed!
As to ethos the author commends himself by his pastoral warmth and empathy. By his frequent use of âweâ and âusâ he shows his solidarity with them in the fight of faith. This serves to enhance rather than diminish his authority as one who practices what he preaches. As for the character of God, he is trustworthy in promise-keeping (Heb 6:18; 10:23); as for Christ, he is the faithful one par excellence (Heb 2:17; 3:6; 12:1â2). In all these ways, the integrity of word and speaker is brought home to the hearers.
Paying closer attention to the various literary genres of Scripture would give our preaching a sharper edge and deeper color.
Hebrews segues from style to style and mood to mood. If we view Hebrewsâor any part of Scriptureâas a contourless landscape of flat propositions, then we may well end up trying to liven it up by imposing our personality on it.
Richard Lischer has wise words on this:
Lischer adds: âThe preacher makes adjustment in matters of diction (word choice, figures of speech, and manner of speech (tone of voice)) not on the basis of his or her personality or mood but in deference to the nature of the text and the demands of the occasion.â
What might Lischerâs phrase âin deference to the nature of the textâ mean as far as Hebrews is concerned?
It might mean recognizing that the opening catena of texts in Hebrews is less a list of proof texts but more a litany of praise which cries out to be preached as proclamation. It might also mean that the sobering typological comparison of...