1
Stanley Hauerwas
Stanley Hauerwas and Contemporary Theological Ethics
The Place of Stanley Hauerwas in the Present Treatment
Stanley Hauerwas rightly refocuses the attention of theological ethics on the importance of community, the distinctiveness of Christian language, and the necessary bond between Christian convictions and their concrete performance. Additionally, his contribution has directed the discourse to look again for the work of an entirely transcendent God amongst the banality of dynamics internal to the Christian worshipping community. He places Jesus Christ at the center of Christian theological ethics and draws from Wesleyan notions of sanctification to argue for the importance of Godâs grace for Christian transformation. Even given the great importance he grants to the categories of narrative and tradition, Christian ethics is not merely an ethical system well informed by a storied reality, but is rather the possibility of moral action created anew by means of Godâs redeeming and sanctifying grace as given through Jesus Christ. For Hauerwas, Christian ethics is a linguistic retraining of vision and the ability to recognize the eschatological self in a truthful story within a community of memory. In these ways, Hauerwasâ work adds much to the potential for articulating an ecumenical ethic of grace in community.
For Hauerwas, Christian ethics is a radical relationship with Godâs transforming grace through transformed vision, language, praxis, and community. This trajectory heralds a different consideration of ethics in the contemporary discourse. Christian ethical transformation is a connection between free, authentic human action and Godâs redeeming agency. In Hauerwasâ efforts toward this cooperative and relational framework for ethics he places himself in a larger stream of theologians across the centuries who have strived to articulate that same framework for the Christian ethical life. In the present chapter, I hope to situate Hauerwas with regard to this project and show those places in which his theology points to the need for this connection between divine and human agency in the moral life, and articulate the means through which he sees this transformative connection occurring. At the same time, I hope to show how much he can benefit from other theologians who share this overall conviction about the nature of Christian ethics, but articulate the connection with complementary language around the shape of human agency, as such, which would take this ideal of an ethic of grace much further. I contend that the goal to which Hauerwas points the contemporary discourse could be sped along by a close conversation with the theology of Thomas Aquinas and the more complete picture of the causal dependence in human action and its connection with Godâs grace that Aquinas can provide.
Of course, Hauerwasâ treatments of these dynamics have changed considerably in the past thirty-plus years. Toward the beginning of his writing career, Hauerwas argued for Christian character as completely self-determined and Christian agency as entirely self-caused (closing the structure of the Christian act to any and all external influences). Hauerwasâ later writings, however, depict the reality that we are in fact determined by the communities in which we live and the narratives by which they subsist. Nonetheless, Hauerwas places strict limits on the ways in which the self can be determined by any external cause. The shape of Christian character, for instance, is quite permeated by the convictions and practices of the worshipping Church for the later Hauerwas. The tools Hauerwas utilizes as he moves toward this increased permeability of the self are truly striking. Formation is linguistic and conceptual. A story-formed community of practice shapes Christian agency through shaping language as the pattern of action and life together. The shaping of Christian character is formation to live Christian foundational grammar. Christian agency, for Hauerwas, is pliable through molding concept, grammar, and thus vision and the ability to live the truth. God speaks forth the church as a new grammar and Christians live as an extension of the Gospel narratives. Hauerwas pushes the discourse to account for Christian ethical transformation in terms of Godâs grace, Christian worship, and the Gospel narratives.
His description of ethics points to a deep connection with divine agency in the individual, and in the worshipping community as a whole. Hauerwas could much benefit, I contend, from a much thicker description of the shape of ethical agency in itself. While his ethics describe the impact of Godâs grace on the grammar, the vision, and the practice of a Christian, they rely largely on the transformative impact of foundational grammar and a narrative-formed community to do so. Other tools can carry his ethics beyond these limits and speak more directly to the pliability of human agency to the movements and non-competitive shaping action of Godâs grace.
As I will argue in this chapter, Hauerwas affords the grace of God in sanctification and the work of the Holy Spirit a central place in his theology, though he is in need of more detailed conceptual tools with regard to grace, the shape of human agency, and its potential to be drawn into cooperation with grace. The greater complexity with which his more recent writing offers to the shape of Christian moral action is a helpful indication that these detailed tools could move the ethical trajectory he offers forward. The overall hope of his place in this project is to articulate an ethic of grace like the one toward which he points, through placing him in interaction with other theologians aiming at the same grace-centered picture of Christian ethics.
The Centrality of Divine Agency
Stanley Hauerwas writes as a preacher and a teacher. Saying that his writing is occasional sells short these two important descriptors. Hauerwas writes not so much to provide a perfectly sound system as to give instruction where it is required, and to preach the centrality of Christ for the Christian life where it needs to be heard. His great gift is insisting on the applicability of Christian convictions and narratives to the ethical life. âEthical reflection may exist in a highly abstract form, but men cannot. We must decide to stay married or celibate, to fight in war or not to fight, to teach our children this rather than that.â Hauerwasâ moral theology seeks to frame a lived existence, never stopping at idealistic frameworks.
The theological ethics of Stanley Hauerwas are, inarguably, christologically centered. Jesus Christ is not just the center of a faith upon which a distinctive community rests, but the promise that our lives rest on a new hope and are enfolded in a new reality. âThe hope by which we journey is not of our own making. Far from arising from our own unworthiness, our hope comes as an open invitation to locate our lives in a new history that is made present in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.â This invitation to locate ourselves in a new history gives hope in that it is not a story of our own making. The hope that we can locate our lives in Christ is not to be drawn from the story, but is the story. Or, as Hauerwas writes, âthe claim that the story of Jesus is a social ethic means that there is no moral point or message that is separable from the story of Jesus . . . Jesusâ identity is prior to the âmeaningâ of the story. There is no meaning that is separable from the story itself.â Trying to find a core to Christian ethics beyond Christ fails to cling to the hope that moral action emerges from becoming a part of Godâs story. The grace of God in Jesus Christ is much more than a mere facet of theological ethics. Rather, âChristians betray themselves [when] we say and act as if the cross of Christ is incidental to Godâs being. In fact, the God we worship and the world God created cannot be truthfully known without the cross.â This story in which we are enfolded is the story of Godâs saving action through Christ. Christian virtue is inseparable from Godâs redeeming and sanctifying work. Moral action emerges, then, not from reflection upon Christ, but is rather âa response to a love relation with God in Christ. That is why it makes sense for the Christian Aquinas to say that true or complete virtue is fundamentally not our own achievement but is rather infused in us by Godâs grace, which saves us and enables us.â The ethic of Stanley Hauerwas consistently indicates Christ as its center and the dynamics of Christian community as its setting. This indication is not just in the centrality of the story of Jesus, but rather strives to be an ethic in which the âlove relation with God in Christâ and the grace of God are the conditions sine qua non.
As Jeffery Stout has rightly noted, âone constant in [Hauerwasâ] thinking from the beginning has been his own traditionâs emphasis on the power of the Holy Spirit to transform the life of the believer.â The grace of God âsaving and enabling usâ finds voice in a variety of ways in Hauerwasâ ethics, but most primarily in the Christian knowing the truth about herself through Christian narrative. For the Christian to know herself and her moral acts according to something other than the âlove relation with God in Christ,â is to miss this truth. âBy making the story of such a Lord central to their lives, Christians are enabled to see the world accurately and without illusion . . . by being trained through Jesusâ story we have the means to name and prevent these ...