1
The Making of an IMC General Secretary
By the time of the Ghana conference of the IMC (1957â58), Newbigin was the candidate of choice to lead the IMC, as the last general secretary, into integration with the WCC. What made Newbigin the unique and unanimous choice of the IMC? This chapter identifies three formative elements which shaped Newbiginâs ecclesiology, the Student Christian Movement (SCM), the Indian church, and the formation of the Church of South India (CSI). Through the SCM Newbigin was introduced to Christianity and inducted into a form of Christianity which rather than being narrow and defensive was dynamic, experimental and ecumenical, having the world as its horizon.
As a young Church of Scotland missionary in South India, Newbigin experienced the dramatic growth of the village churches in rural Tamil Nadu. And, as a missionary, he was exposed to the dichotomous relationship that existed between mission and church expressed in the problematic relationship between the Church of Scotlandâs mission and the Indian church. Newbigin saw in the Indian church a church which was both missionary and profoundly concerned to regain its unity.
This was expressed in the negotiations for church union which concluded successfully with the formation of the Church of South India in 1947. Newbigin entered late in the negotiation process but rapidly assumed prominent responsibility, first in India and then internationally. Newbiginâs theological reflections and apologetic for the South Indian union scheme enabled him to develop an ecclesiology in which the eschatological dimension was prominent. This gave credence to his claim that his experience of the Indian church was of relevance beyond the confines of South Asia.
Although Newbiginâs experience of the SCM, the Indian church and the formation of the CSI are uniquely personal, his experience was not unparalleled in the lives of others. This chapter does not seek to provide an exhaustive list of the early factors which shaped Newbiginâs theological outlook. Undoubtedly during his time of theological study at Westminster College he was particularly indebted to the influence of the collegeâs principal, John Oman, and his successor Herbert Farmer. However, at this early milestone on Newbiginâs theological journey it can be acknowledged that whilst Newbiginâs faith was âChrist-centered as to content, origin and effectâ his ecclesiology was still incipient, âawaiting further development.â
What is being claimed in this chapter is that, besides Newbiginâs general theological development, the SCM, his early Indian experience, and his role in the formation of the CSI, were critical in determining Newbiginâs ecclesiology. Paul Löffler, who worked under Newbigin in the IMC, recalled how Newbigin would repeatedly refer to his Indian experiences âto an extent that I would judge them to be fundamental for his orientation.â This chapter seeks to show how these formative experiences prepared Newbigin for his future role in integration. As Newbigin reflected on the Indian church and sought to provide a rigorous theological defense for it he quickly rose, above his peers, to international prominence, making him the obvious choice as general secretary, who was prescient in the theological foundation he provided for integration.
The Influence of the Student Christian Movement
âNewbigin is most essentially an SCM man, he owes his Christianity . . . to the SCM.â
Newbiginâs Involvement with the Student Christian Movement
From Newbiginâs earliest publications it is evident that he understood his faith as a world faith, which, although of immense personal importance, must also engage in the issues and concerns of the world. Newbigin gained this perspective as an undergraduate at Cambridge University (1928â31) through the Student Christian Movement (SCM); and through his involvement with the SCM he was introduced to a wider network of Christian leaders with worldwide horizons.
The historian of the British evangelical movement, David Bebbington, notes that evangelicalism in Britain during the 1920s was marked by severe division. Although â[p]olarisation was by no means total, for co-operation between the wings, liberal and conservative, continued in a number of organizations. Yet division was sufficiently acute to cause schism in several Evangelical institutions.â Bebbington highlights several reasons for this division, chief being âconflicting estimates of the Bible,â i.e. debate over the infallibility of scripture. It was over this issue that the Cambridge Inter-Collegiate Christian Union (CICCU) disaffiliated from the SCM in 1910. Other issues driving division included the emergence of premillenialism, the holiness movement, responses to high Anglicanism, the ongoing debate on the relation between science and religion, the use of leisureâfor some there was a need for âutter separation from everything that was questionable,â and attitudes to the social dimension of the gospelâwith many evangelicals repudiating their earlier engagement with social issues. However, in contrast to the American situation the British response to these controversies was more tempered. âFundamentalist controversies did exist in Britain, but they were storms in a teacup when compared with the blizzards of invective that swept contemporary America.â Unlike the stark polarization across the Atlantic, in Britain, â[t]he cleavage between conservative and liberals was far from absolute . . . There was therefore a broadening continuum of Evangelical opinion . . . rather than a simple separation into two camps.â But as the twentieth century progressed British evangelicalism became increasingly fragmented, and polarized between liberal and conservative wings as the influence of those able to hold a mediating position wan...