1
Conditional Futurism in Sum
Apocalypse means “revelation” or “uncovering.” Biblical apocalypses such as the book of Revelation describe divine visions or dreams filled with symbolism about important future events that involve miraculous intervention while a divinely appointed mediator helps to interpret the vision. Many Christian scholars hold to traditional futurism, which teaches that the apocalypse in Revelation prophesied unconditional judgments about the end times. For example, Revelation 19 prophesied that the beast and the false prophet would oppose the Lord and be thrown into the lake of fire forever. Traditional futurists teach that this prophetic judgment against the beast and false prophet is unconditional; that is, nothing could alter the general outcome of the beast and false prophet opposing the Lord and being thrown into the lake of fire forever. However, careful study of biblical prophecy indicates that the outcome of any prophetic judgment is conditional; this is, the disobedient audience of the prophecy could genuinely repent and alter the outcome of the judgment. The word and purposes of the Lord never alter while the outcome of the word of the Lord can vary.
Biblical passages that teach about conditions in prophetic judgments include the apocalypse in Daniel 4 and classical prophecies such as Jeremiah 18:1–10 and Ezekiel 33:13–16. Daniel 4:19–27 describes Daniel interpreting an apocalypse dreamt by Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar:
In these verses, Daniel interpreted the symbols in the apocalypse dreamt by Nebuchadnezzar. The Most High, who is God, decreed that Nebuchadnezzar would live like a wild animal for seven periods of time until he would acknowledge that God is sovereign over the kingdoms of the earth. This implied that Nebuchadnezzar would lose his throne for seven periods of time. Daniel in verse 4:27 also interpreted that Nebuchadnezzar could repent and alter the outcome of the decree of God in this apocalyptic judgment. Also, this apocalyptic dream included no explicit conditions for the judgment while Daniel interpreted implicit conditions in the judgment.
The scenario in Daniel 4 agrees with Jeremiah 18:1–10 and Ezekiel 33:13–16 teaching that genuine repentance of a wicked nation or a wicked person alters the outcome of a prophetic judgment. For instance, Jeremiah 18:1–10 describes the Lord, who is God, teaching Jeremiah about the conditional nature of both prophetic blessings and prophetic judgments:
In these verses, the Lord directed Jeremiah to observe the work of a potter. Jeremiah saw the potter make a clay pot with defects in the structure. Then, the potter used the same clay to start over and make another pot, which presumably lacked defects. Next, the Lord compared himself to the potter while the Lord compared the Israelite kingdom of Judah to the clay used to make pots. After that, the Lord in Jeremiah 18:7–10 expanded the illustration to include any possible nation at any given time. The Lord declared that any time that he announces a judgment of destruction against any nation, then that nation could repent and avoid the destruction. For instance, the Lord in Jeremiah 27:1–11 announced judgments against the nations of Edom, Moab, Ammon, Tyre and Sidon. Also, verses 18:1–10 teach that at any time that the Lord announces a special blessing in favor of any nation, then that nation could turn to evil and lose the special blessing. This teaching in 18:1–10 implies conditions in all prophetic blessings and prophetic judgments to the nations. Likewise, prophetic blessings and prophetic judgments to nations need no explicit statement of conditions while they always include implicit conditions. In all cases, the word of the Lord proves true regardless of the outcome.
Ezekiel 33:13–16 parallels Jeremiah 10:1–10 by teaching about the conditions of prophetic blessings and prophetic judgments to individual people:
Ezekiel 33:13–16 teaches that the Lord could prophesy that a righteous person would surely live, but the righteous person would lose the special blessing of life if he turns to evil. Also, the Lord could prophesy to a wicked person, “You will surely die,” but the wicked person could turn away from evil and live. These verses also imply that particular prophetic blessings and prophetic judgments need no statement of explicit conditions while they always include implicit conditions.
The Bible includes many other cases of conditional prophecy. For example, the book of Jonah taught that God pronounced a judgment of destruction against the city of Nineveh. The prophetic word of judgment against Nineveh included no explicit conditions while repentance of the people of Nineveh altered the outcome of the prophetic word.
This book introduces a paradigm-shifting interpretation of the end times called conditional futurism. Conditional futurism proposes conditional judgments in end-time prophecy including conditions in the apocalyptic judgment of the final antichrist, also called the man of lawlessness and an eighth king. Likewise, the proposal of conditional end-time judgments challenges the unconditional judgments of traditional futurism. And the proposal of a final antichrist challenges other end-time theologies such as preterism and idealism. For instance, full preterism says that events from AD 30 to 70 completely fulfilled all prophecies in Revelation while idealism says that the prophecies in Revelation apply to all periods of time with no focus on the return of the Lord.
Conditional futurism also works with the belief that Jesus Christ inaugurated the kingdom of God on earth during his first-century ministry while Christ will consummate the kingdom when he returns. For example, Christ associated the kingdom with his preaching of God’s word while he also taught about fulfilling the kingdom when he returns.
The next chapter outlines principles of biblical interpretation (hermeneutics). Then, the book interprets selections...