part one
Calvinâs Anthropology
1
The Imago Dei in the Divine-Human Relationship
Introduction: Calvinâs Theological Anthropology
Calvinâs anthropology can be called a theological anthropology in the sense that he maintains that the knowledge of humanity is possible only through piety. In the opening chapter of the final Latin edition of the Institutes, Calvin states the importance of the knowledge of humanity in his theology by arguing that knowledge of humanity and knowledge of God are inseparably âjoined by many bonds.â He then argues, âtrue and sound wisdom consists of the knowledge of God and of ourselves.â In the following section in the Institutes, Calvin emphasises that âpietyâ is a prerequisite for the knowledge of God. He thinks that any discussion about God would be meaningless if it did not consider His grace towards human race: âMan never achieves a clear knowledge of himself unless he has first looked upon Godâs face.â Calvin defines piety as âreverence joined with love of God which the knowledge of his benefits induces,â and it depends on menâs recognition that âthey owe everything to God, that they are nourished by his fatherly care, that he is the Author of their every good.â Therefore, an investigation of Calvinâs idea of the image of God is useful to understand his idea of humanity in the divine-human relationship. He states the image of God as the key to his theological anthropology at the beginning of the first edition of the Institutes: âIn order for us to come to a sure knowledge of ourselves, we must first grasp the fact that Adam, parent of all, was created in the image and likeness of God.â
With regard to the concept of the image of God in Calvinâs anthropology, I will use Grenzâs framework of the âstructuralâ and ârelationalâ aspects of the image of God in humanity: the âstructuralâ aspects apply to âthe very structure of human nature,â such as reason and the immortal soul, and the ârelationalâ aspects refer to âa relationship between Creator and creatureâ and âwhat occurs as a consequence of the relationship.â This chapter investigates the theological focus of Calvinâs theological anthropology by examining Calvinâs discussion of the image of God according to the three stages which are implicitly supposed in his anthropology in the Institutes, namely creation, the fall, and restoration. That is because Calvinâs anthropological discussions appear in this order in the Institutes (1559): the original condition of humanity in creation is discussed in the Institutes, I.15; the human condition after the fall in the Institutes II.1â3; and the human condition in the course of regeneration in the Institutes III, 3â10. This investigation will show that although Calvin deals with the âstructuralâ aspects of the image of God in some specific contexts, he focuses mainly on its ârelationalâ aspects, in particular, the restoration of the image of God in humanity by grace from this teleological perspective.
The Image of God in Creation
The Two Aspects of the Imago Dei
Calvinâs idea of the image of God has been one of the most controversial topics among scholars. The controversy arises basically from the absence of any firm definition of this concept within Calvinâs writings themselves. According to Schreinerâs summary, two groups of studies have emerged: while some have commented on Calvinâs relational understanding of the imago Dei, such as âthe right spiritual attitude,â âgratitude,â the role of either âreflecting Godâs gloryâ and âmirroring Godâs image,â others have pointed out his structural understanding of the image of God as found in âreason,â âimmortality of the soulâ and âhuman dignity.â
The former group of studies has tended to argue that Calvinâs discussion of the image of God focuses mainly on the relationship between Christ and a Christian. Both Torrance and Niesel argue that Calvin discussed the image of God in order to explain Christâs benefits for the salvation of humanity, who has been alienated from God and lost his original âorientation towards his Creator.â Likewise, Prins claims that the theological emphasis, concerning the relationship between the restored image of God and the original image of God in Adam, is more essential to Calvinâs thought than analysis of its nature from a mere anthropological perspective. This group has a tendency to systematise Calvinâs idea of the imago Dei from christological perspective.
The latter group of studies have complained that a systematic approach of the former group to Calvinâs idea of the imago Dei, focusing on the relationship between Christ and a Christian, tends to ignore the other dimensions of Calvinâs anthropology. Cairns argues that the relational and existential interpretation of Calvinâs understanding of the image of God âis n...