Part One
Historical and Theological Foundations
1
The Reformer in His Context
Revolutionary or servant of God? Thundering prophet or consummate politician? Nasty old man or spiritual pastor? Ardently loved or passionately despised? Will the real John Knox please stand up? John Knox indeed was a complex and contradictory figure. To be sure, he displayed several faces and wore many hats.
The Scottish reformer, therefore, has been the subject of many interpretationsâsome wildly different. Knox was a controversial figure in his day. And he continues to be so down to the present. He has been both loved and hated by his contemporaries and historians through the centuries. No sixteenth-century reformer has aroused such a range of emotions and opinions. Few people have taken a neutral stance in regard to John Knox.
These differing opinions largely concern several related questions: What was Knoxâs role or vocation? How did he perform this role or vocation? What kind of person was John Knox? How important was he to the Scottish Reformation? Historians have expressed different views regarding Knoxâs role or vocationâprophet, pastor, preacher, reformer, statesman, revolutionary, and more.1 Actually, most modern scholars have focused on two aspects of one general subject: Knoxâs political ideas, especially his theory of resistance, and his attitudes toward female rulers.2
This study attempts to connect these aspects of Knoxâs life. He functioned as a pastor, preacher, and a reformer of religion on a national level. And such reform often entailed advocating revolutionary ideasâespecially the slaying of idolatrous or Catholic rulers. While these roles predominate, they rest on a particular religious faith shaped by his interpretation of Scripture, his view of God, and the events of sixteenth-century Europe. Section one establishes these beliefs. Part two spells out his vocationânamely functioning as a prophet, pastor, and preacher. All of thisâhis faith and vocationâculminated in his revolutionary political ideas, which are the subjects of section three.
In respect to evaluating Knox, W. Stanford Reid divided the reformer into three camps: his supporters, his opponents, and those in the middle.3 Knoxâs advocates have seen him as the âright man for the right time in Scotland.â Some of these admirers see little fault in Knox. In their eyes, Knox has no warts and may have even been âSt. John.â4
But the Scottish reformer has had his fierce opponentsâboth in his day and today. In his time, of course, the leading Catholics denounced him. So did the more secular Protestants who opposed his program. In our day, some biographers and historians have criticized Knoxâs attitude toward Queen Mary, his outlook regarding female rulers, his advocacy of violence, or minimized his role in the Scottish Reformation.5 The film Mary Queen of Scots portrays Knox as a strange man with a long black beard who jumps out from behind a bush and berates the queen. âThe image of John Knox as a cross between Ian Paisley and the Ayatollah Khomeiniâ seems to be âlodged in the popular mind,â says Stewart Lamont.6
Fortunately, some observers have taken the middle ground. They do not go overboard in either their praise or condemnation of Knox. Instead, they have sought a measure of objectivity. They regard Knox as a leading figure in the Scottish Reformation, but not the only force. There would have been a reformation without Knox. Still, he helped chart its course. Some observers in this camp have even become somewhat indifferent toward the Scottish reformer.7
Whether one views Knox positively or negatively, he certainly pursued his vocation with great vigor. His vocation was to preach the gospel, not to be a writer nor an ecclesiastical organizer or official. His main duty in life was, as he expressed it frequently, âto blow my masterâs trumpet.â He saw himself as a preaching, rather than a writing, prophet proclaiming the gospel of Godâs grace in Jesus Christ: âFor considering myself rather called by God to instruct the ignorant, comfort the sorrowful, confirm the weak, and rebuke the proud by lively voice in these most corrupt days, then to compose books for the age to come. . . .â8
Knox expressed his vocation in three overlapping rolesâpreacher, pastor, and prophet. He served as the pastor or minister of congregations in Scotland, England, and the Continent. Unlike our time, the ministerâs primary function was to preach Godâs Word. Thus the roles of pastor and preacher must be regarded as inseparable. As a minister, however, Knox did more than preach. He pastored or shepherded the flock, instructing and comforting them in their trials and tribulations. Still, when Knox preached, he often thundered like an Old Testament prophetârebuking the proud and corrupt by a lively voice. His vocation focused on individuals, congregations, and entire nations. When attempting to reform religion on the national level, Knox often adopted the role and rhetoric of an Old Testament prophet.
In working out his vocation as a prophet, Knox can legitimately be seen as a revolutionary, a political figure, and the reformer of religion on a national level. But he also functioned as a pastor. And in doing so, a softer, more caring John Knox emerged. He could, of course, roar like a...