Part I
Foundations
It is the simple yet profound question of human nature: are humans naturally good? Are truth, wisdom, and virtue already inside of us, just waiting for the proper conditions to grow and flourish? Is the default state of human moral character set at the right balance and only loses its equilibrium by accident? Or are we fulfilled and right when we are properly aligned with something higher, larger, or deeper? Are humans born complete, or at least very potentially complete in themselves, or is there a āGod-shaped holeā in everyone? This question has a direct connection with virtue and vice. It also helps us understand the works in this bookās first section.
Human Potential and Protection I
Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero would generally agree that humans have within them all of the tools that they need to live a fully satisfying life. There is even a phrase that we use with Platoās writing to describe how humans have all they need within them and that they merely need to develop those aspects. That phrase is the Maieutic method, and it is derived from the Greek word for midwife. Socrates, the speaker in Platoās writings, describes himself as a midwife who is there to assist in the ābirthā or emergence of truth that is already inside the learner. The Republic is an extended birthing session, where Socrates coaxes his learners through the sometimes difficult and even painful process of bringing the truth to light. What is brought to light is how the ideal state is based upon people following their best innate inclinations. Those inclinations are for everyone to do what they are best equipped to do, with those best equipped to look after the entire state acting as social guardians and facilitators.
Aristotle has a similarly optimistic view of human beings. His idea is that with proper training, one can acquire the habits of a virtuous life. In fact, Aristotleās view sounds like what we generally think of when we think of Eastern medicine. The emphasis with both is on the proper balance. For humans to be successful, they must have the properly balanced response to any human experience or impulse. Everyone, for example, experiences fear, but the courageous respond to it properly. Those who are overly confident in the face of fear are rash or foolhardy, while those who are overly afraid are cowards. Aristotle catalogs the whole gamut of human experience and impulses to show how deficiencies and excesses make one morally unhealthy in the same way that an excess or deficiency of protein, iron, or calcium would make one physically ill. Rational self-examination with an eye on the healthiest individuals can help one see where those excesses or deficiencies lie, and then it is fully within oneās power to correct them by finding the proper balance. Of course rational self-examination requires proper training. Children, for example, do not know how to find a proper balance, but with the right training people can form the best habits to bring to life their innate potential.
What does not come through in the excerpts from Plato and Aristotle is that sometimes life just stinks. There is pain, suffering, and difficulties. There are ironic reversals, where just when everything seemed to be just right, it all falls apart. A view of lifeās excruciating reversals, not to mention its utter unreliability, must have been especially clear to Romans like Cicero. In the face of so much social and personal decline and disappointment, Romans like Cicero adapted a fierce devotion to what they could controlāthemselves. The emphasis on personal integrity, a steady resilience and fortitude in spite of all, and a levelheadedness in the face of any potential persuasions by pleasure or pain are the hallmarks of the approach known as Stoicism. If Plato and Aristotleās view is human expansion, human development from the growth of latent powers, Ciceroās outlook is virtueās fortress in the midst of a siege, a soul that can remain still and safe with its internal resources and integrity.
Human Potential and Protection II
The first three works in this section are from Athens, so to speak: from the humanistic Greeks and Romans, who held the view of humans naturally following their best innate inclinations to achieve their highest potential. The last four works are from Jerusalem, from the theocentric Jewish and Christian cultures centered on belief that oneās highest potential came from a proper relationship with God. God is the standard by which human potential is measured in the theocentric works. That Being is also the one who guarantees the specific theocentric promise: eternal life. It is the divine instead of the human foundation and standard of virtue and vice that distinguishes Jerusalem from Athens.
Proverbs are wise sayings precisely because they reinforce how real wisdom comes from a proper respect and reverence for God. These sayings set up the contrast between the wise, who submit their will and understanding to God via obedience, against those who deviate, who stray, or who believe that they know themselves. Peace, power, and protection come to those who live by the covenant no matter what the circumstance (like Joseph, who was sold into Egypt, and who is mentioned later on in this book, in the introduction to Proverbs). Isaiah extends this in his description of a great leader or Messiah, who, because of His faithfulness to the covenant, would embody the greatest human and divine qualities and would subsequently bless the entire human race.
The greatest contrast between Athens and Jerusalem comes in Jesusās description of the blessed. Aristotleās āblessedā are those whose ambition has combined with innate talents to make them powerful, magnanimous, and universally admired. Jesus asserts that the poor in spirit, the meek, and those who mourn are the ideal. In Paulās writings we find a similar contrast. In Athens being virtuous means following oneās best tendencies and in being balanced and healthy. For Paul, being virtuous is a constant and heated battle, and it is a battle that requires weaponry that only God through the Spirit can provide. Paulās view of the Spiritās work against sin seems closer to Western medicineās view of antibodies, which destroy attacking viruses. Aristotle seeks balance, the golden mean between too much and too little, whereas Paul seeks absolute victory and triumph. Plato may hear the momentary cries of virtueās birth, but Paul hears the tumultuous clamor of virtue and viceās life-or-death struggle.
Platoās The Republic
Introduction
Platoās Republic is haunted by sheepāfat, lazy, and stupidly obedient sheep. Behind those sheep are greedy and selfish shepherds who care for them, keeping them safe, happy, and well-fed long enough to let them reproduce, to sheer them, and to butcher them. The reason that sheep haunt the Republic is that the discussion that we are most interested in is about the nature of justice. What is justice? What does it mean to be just, and where can we find justice? And, to get to the problem, who does justice benefitāthe rulers or the ruled? Could it be that what passes for justice is simply a cover that the powerful use to take advantage of the powerless? Is justice the shepherdās crook that oppressive rulers use to keep the herded masses stupid and subservient to their selfish ends?
We hear the ghost sheep in the first book of The Republic. The Republic is a discussion between Socrates and various speakers, and in the first book we meet Thrasymachus, someone who seems to really have it in for Socrates. Thrasymachus can hardly contain himself as the discussion of justice begins. When he finally gets a chance to interrupt, he calls Socrates an immature, snot-nosed child who does not know how the world really works. He offers this lesson: