Environmental Stewardship

Douma, Kloosterman

• Publisher: Wipf and Stock
• Year: 2015
• eBook ISBN: 9781498206013
• Topic: Theology & Religion
• Subtopic: Religion

If any single word in the Christian vocabulary captures our relationship to--and responsibility for--the environment, that word is stewardship. It is a word that brings into view the relationship between humanity and the natural world of water, land, animals, and fellow human beings.Nevertheless, today, some people think Christianity, especially Calvinism, is largely responsible for many of our environmental problems. The language of exercising dominion, subduing the earth, creation mandate, and technological progress somehow suggests abuse, exploitation, and pollution.But are these criticisms correct? In this book you will receive an honest and clearheaded analysis from a Christian perspective of our role as human beings in caring for the environment, along with careful explanation of important Bible passages and teachings relating to environmental stewardship.What about humanity's relationship to the earth, to animals, to their own genetic capacities? What about genetic screening? Germline therapy? Eugenics? When do science and scientific experimentation cross the moral boundary line?This primer will introduce you to this timely moral discussion, while placing before your eyes with honest detail both the damage resulting from our human interaction with the creation, and our personal duties toward the Creator of this earth.

1

Environment

Damage and Guilt

A Sad Development

Especially since 1970 we have become aware of the destruction that human beings can wreak on the environment. The report to the Club of Rome published in 1972 (titled The Limits to Growth) created a sensation. Using computer models, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology calculated that the limits of population and economic growth would be reached within a hundred years. Moreover, the report detailed, the limits of environmental pollution would be reached within the foreseeable future.

The researchers at MIT explained how five factors (population, food production, industrialization, pollution, and the use of non-replaceable natural resources) influence each other and thereby grow exponentially. As an example, a child who grows half an inch taller each year grows linearly, but a sum of money invested at 7 percent interest grows exponentially. Each year the interest increases the capital, so that the next year the sum of money has increased by a specific exponent. That, of course, is good for the investor. But there are also damaging forms of exponential growth, with serious consequences for the environment. The report to the Club of Rome compared the growth of human society to the pattern of a water lily growing in a pond. The lily doubles in size every day, so if it remains undisturbed, it will cover the pond in thirty days and choke off all other life in the pond. When the lily looks small, you do not worry yet about cutting it back, until the moment half the pond is covered: “On what day will that happen? On the twenty-ninth day, of course. You have only one day to save your pond.”1

In 1974, the Club of Rome received a second report revising the methodology of the first report.2 The first report had described the world as one complete entity and its predictions therefore applied to the whole world. Understandably, countries in the Third World in particular criticized that methodology. Surely predictions about the rich northern hemisphere of the world did not necessarily apply also to the poor southern hemisphere, did they? Besides, the first report essentially concluded with a plea for “zero growth,” and developing countries (among others) understandably criticized the report for this reason.

A regionalized world model, in which the world was divided into ten regions, replaced the undifferentiated methodology of the first report. Still, the second report communicated the same seriousness as the first. Without preventive action, the consequences of the current trends would be catastrophic fifty years from the date of the report.

In 1988, one of the authors of the second report, Eduard Pestel, delivered a new report to the Club of Rome. In it he analyzed the mistakes of the first report and also rejected the idea of “zero growth.” However, he proposed that, rather than carrying on with the current undifferentiated growth, we must instead strive to promote what he called “organic growth and development.” By that phrase he meant that together we must determine what may or may not be allowed to grow. Currently there is unchecked growth, but organic growth demands recognizing mutual interdependence, which does not permit any part of the world to grow at the expense of another part. The mutual interdependence of countries and regions, Pestel argued, is a fact, not a matter of choice.3 Economist K. E. Boulding has compared the earth to a spaceship: a spaceship is limited unless equipped with an energy source and a food supply. According to Boulding, the earth is limited like a spaceship and if we do not cease our current wasteful “cowboy economy” in favor of a “spaceship economy,” the consequences will be dire.4

These are alarming messages that have not lost their relevance at all, although there has been widespread criticism of the reports to the Club of Rome. Looking back on the discussion, Pestel said in 1988 that the 1971 report was but a first, defective step. But that step generated a lasting and necessary interest in the future of humankind.

The commotion the report caused (especially in the Netherlands) may have dissipated; however, certain things have become part of public consciousness as a result of the discussions generated by the report: the world is finite and there are limits to growth. Indeed, we have a responsibility for the future, a responsibility we cannot escape.

The topic I raise in this chapter poses questions like: What is our attitude and relationship to the environment? We know that it is essential to our existence. Are we destroying it and, if so, how did that happen? What is necessary in order for us to change course so that we interact with the environment in a responsible way?

Examples of Environmental Pollution

By the environment, we mean our physical, inanimate, and animate surroundings, with which we have a mutual relationship.5 Often we use the terms ecosystem and ecology as well. Tellingly, the latter two terms derive from the Greek word oikos, which means “household.” Without housing or shelter, people will die. Just like all other living beings, they too depend upon vital life processes that occur between animate elements (such as plants, bacteria, animals, and people) and inanimate elements (such as air, water, minerals, and technological installations). Without such processes, there would be no life on earth. When an ecological problem arises in inanimate matter, many animate species may degenerate or become extinct, and, indeed, human life itself is endangered.

Many ecosystems have already been damaged. Let me give a number of examples. Deforestation is an alarming phenomenon throughout the world. People need firewood and timber, agriculture claims a lot of forests, and reforestation occurs rarely. Almost half of the primitive forest has already disappeared, despite the fact that precisely there we encounter an astounding variety of plant and animal species. Rapid deforestation and heavy erosion cause the soil to deteriorate, beginning the process of desertification. The demand for firewood and food remains and grows as the population increases and expands, resulting in continuing deforestation. Exporting wood to wealthy countries causes additional and extensive deforestation. Such rapaciousness seriously affects our climate. Significant droughts and enormous floods are often the result, for deforested areas can no longer retain moisture.

Anyone who thinks that this happens only in tropical regions is mistaken. Damage to forests in the Alps, for example, is having alarming consequences. Tourism is the source of much of the problem. Because of the prosperity of western European countries, summer and winter tourism has increased exponentially. A network of roads, ski runs, parking lots, and other tourist amenities has caused the disappearance of large areas of forest. Many tourists also means many cars. Exhaust fumes have caused acid rain, which in turn has impaired the vitality of alpine forests.

But we can see the effects of deforestation even closer to home. Our Dutch forests, too, are being threatened by acid rain, which happens when pollutants in the air (both in solid form and dissolved in rain, hail, and fog) fall to the ground. Trees and other plants collect most of the pollutants and absorb them into their leaves. The rest falls through runoff into the ground in high concentrations. Then the same trees and plants derive their nutrition from the polluted soil, often with disastrous consequences. The worst pollutants are sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide, which are released through burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas. In the Netherlands there is an additional pollutant as well, namely, ammonia, a byproduct of the great quantities of manure generated by the farming industry.

Forests have been called the lungs of the earth. But water—seas, rivers, lakes, and ground water—is also vital to our ecosystem. It is widely known that industries impair the quality of surface water by means of chemical and thermal pollution. Illegally dumping oil and poisonous substances pollutes the oceans. Additionally, eutrophication (the addition of excessive nutrients) happens when sewage, pulp from paper mills, and the effluent from slaughterhouses overburdens ...

Table of contents

• Title Page
• Editor’s Introduction
• Chapter 1: Environment
• Chapter 2: The Bible and the Environment
• Chapter 3: The Agenda
• Chapter 4: Genetic Engineering (1)
• Chapter 5: Genetic Engineering (2)
• Bibliography
• Scripture Index
• Subject Index