1
Introduction
Overall Field of Study
Written by the Sierra Leonean journalist, activist and politician Isaac TA Wallace-Johnson (1895ā1965) and published in Ghanaās African Morning Post in 1936 by Nnamdi Azikiwe (1904ā1996), who would later become Nigeriaās first African President, the article led to the detention of both men by Ghanaās colonial government. In the cradle of African nationalism, this expression of African sociopolitical grievances depicted Christianity as expressly part of the colonial machinery. The stance of Wallace-Johnson and Azikiweās highlights the growing strength of African feeling in the middle decades of the twentieth century about the relationship between Christianity and colonialism, which was shared by participants in movements for African independence, and was reflected in the work of later scholars.
This work explores the vexed relationship between Christianity and colonialism, especially in the last twenty years of white rule in what is now Zimbabwe. The title, The Bible, the Bullet and the Ballot, captures the range of forces that were at work in the nationalist movement at the time. The book seeks to assess the justification of the negative evaluation of the influence of Christianity on Africans in the late colonial period in relation to Zimbabwe. In order to do this, a detailed exploration of the role of the Zimbabwean Christian community in the wider political engagement against colonialism between c. 1960 and 1980 is offered. The approach of the church, and institutions to which Christians belonged, to the questions of universal suffrage and the armed struggle will be of particular concern. Between these three fundamental issues, the āBibleā representing Christianity, the āBulletā representing the armed struggle, and the āBallotā universal suffrage or the struggle for democracy, there was a complex interplay.
Christianity, together with its institutions and adherents, were an important part of the wider sociopolitical narrative in Zimbabwe of the struggle for the restitution of Africansā political rights. The specific sociopolitical developments within the historical period under discussion will be explored, alongside the responses of representatives of the Christian community.
Colonialism has been identified as an aspect of imperialism, in which an imperial power imposes its control, and takes legal sovereignty, of a territory without a process of widespread settlement. Although colonization can be part of the process of colonialism, such as the extensive white settlement in Kenya or Zimbabwe, it is not always a feature. The level of white settlement in places like Botswana, Malawi and Zambia was significantly lower than that of Zimbabwe.
The attitudes of scholars to the role of Christianity in colonialism are considerably varied. In 1967 the Kenyan academic Ali Mazrui asserted, āJust as Augustine had allied Christianity with a concept of Pax Romana, so did Christianity later come to be linked to the whole vision of Pax Britannica. In Africa Christianity came to be particularly associated with colonization.ā In 1980, he went further, āThe God of Love was mobilized behind the mask of āimperial pacification.ā The message of Christianity discouraged Africans not only from fighting each other but also from resisting the colonial presence.ā
Others share this wholly negative perspective on the involvement of Christianity in colonialism. Frantz Fanon in The Wretched of the Earth declared, ā[W]e should place DDT, which destroys parasites, carriers of diseases, on the same level as Christianity . . . The church in the colonies is a white manās church, a foreignersā church. It does not call the colonized to ways of God, but to the ways of the white man, to the ways of the master, the ways of the oppressor.ā
Claire Robertson observes how agents of Christianity often preceded and encouraged colonial advance, āIf they found their progress in making converts impeded on occasion, they sometimes promoted political control to put them in a better position to succeed. Thus the missionary played a critical role in perpetuating the idea of āthe white manās burdenā as a justification for European conquest.ā
Based on their researches of the interaction between colonialism and Christianity on the border of South Africa and Botswana John and Jean Comaroff have stressed the correspondence between Christian mission and secular colonialism, arguing that conversion and civilization were ātwo sides of the same coin.ā Although not all missionaries held the same view, missions were representative of colonial values, āFrom early on, the colonial evangelists gave up in practice, if not always in their public pronouncements, on the fragile distinction between salvation and civilization, between the theological and the worldly sides of their mission.ā So too Richard Gray in The Colonial Moment observes of missionaries in Southern Africa, āmost missions with a few notable exceptions, welcomed the extension of colonial ruleā and āWhite supremacy . . . seemed to many missionaries working there almost to be part of Godās establishing order.ā On this construction, mission-founded churches, with vested interests in the colonial establishment, would be unlikely partners of movements for African independence. The Comaroffsā view stands in contrast to the more nuanced app...