Chapter 1
By The Sweat of Your Face
Cursed is the ground because of you; in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life.
Genesis 3:17
I believe the first backache occurred in the Garden of Eden. When they failed to follow their makerās instructions, God pronounced a curse on the man and the woman. He told Adam that he would have to labor and toil on a relatively unproductive ground to get food to eat. Because the human race spread out, back pain now covers the face of the whole Earth.
In my experience most cases get better in a couple of weeks without any treatment at all. In spite of that, billions of dollars are spent each year on doctorās visits, diagnostic tests, and various remedies for neck and back pain. According to WebMD, low back pain is one of the most common reasons for visits to the doctor. In a survey, one in four adults reported having low back pain in the last three months.
Over the last decade CAT scans and MRIs have become increasingly common in the diagnosis of spinal disorders. Narcotic prescriptions, injections around the vertebra, and surgery have exploded in popularity. Most of the money spent on these supposed cures is wasted. Researchers at of the University of Washington reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association that patients did not get better results, just higher costs.
Some things havenāt changed much in the last 2000 years. The New Testament records an encounter between Jesus and a woman with persistent, unrelenting, uterine bleeding. Mark 5:25ā30 says that sheād been bleeding for twelve years, and she āhad suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better but rather grew worse.ā Those of you with chronic, recurring back or neck pain can identify.
BMJ Clinical Evidence, a publication of the British Medical Journal, is one of my āgo toā places to find the best information about the effectiveness of the most popular and common therapies. Their researchers perform systematic reviews of the clinical trials published in the English language. In their review of acute low back pain (pain present less than twelve weeks) published on their website on May 9, 2011, they say
⢠NSAIDs (ibuprofen family) and muscle relaxants improve symptoms, but they sometimes cause adverse effects. Trade offs are involved.
⢠There are no studies on the effectiveness of steroid injections in acute low back pain.
⢠It is not known whether spinal manipulation (chiropractic), acupuncture, back schools, behavioral therapy, massage, multidisciplinary treatment programs, lumbar supports, TENS, temperature treatments, or exercises make any difference in acute low back pain.
The medical evidence leads to the conclusion that this painful condition is usually self-limiting. Thatās doctor-speak for āit gets better with no treatment.ā Iām not saying itās all in your head, but the times I have personally come down with disabling back pain were times of high stress in my life. The chapter on depression adds more to this overly simplistic and utterly unhelpful statement, so donāt close the book yet.
Chronic Low Back Pain (published 08 Oct 2010)
On the same website I discovered that about 75 percent of people in developed countries develop low back pain at some time, and their symptoms usually improve in less than two weeks. A small number of patients, however, have symptoms persisting after one year of follow-up care. The percentage of patients who describe their back pain as āchronicā has increased, from less than 5 percent in 1992 to more than 10 percent in 2006. In the highest-quality, randomized, controlled clinical trials (the āgold standardā in medical research) BMJ Clinical Evidence makes the following observations about the effectiveness of a variety of medical, physical, psychological and surgical therapies.
⢠NSAIDs might be more effective than placebos.
⢠Narcotics might improve pain and function compared to placebos, but they have well-recognized adverse effects.
⢠We donāt know whether antidepressants reduce pain or improve function more than placebos. Suicidal behavior might occur more often in those who use antidepressants.
⢠Benzodiazepines might lessen pain.
⢠We donāt know if steroid injections improve chronic low back pain in people without sciatica (pain running down into the leg).
⢠Spinal fusion is no better than intensive rehabilitation with a cognitive behavioral component. (This again raises the question of the role lifeās stresses play in causing back pain. The chapter on depression sheds more light on this.)
⢠Acupuncture, back schools, and chiropractic manipulation may reduce pain in the short term, but their effects on function are unclear.
⢠Massage may lessen pain and improve function.
⢠We donāt know whether biofeedback, lumbar supports, traction, or TENS provide pain relief.
⢠We also donāt know whether electrothermal disc therapy or disc replacement lessens pain or improves function. Ditto for radio frequency destruction of the nerves.
Variations in Medical Practice
The science then, sadly, is insufficient to steer us toward a satisfactory solution to the ubiquitous problem of lower back pain. This uncertainty, no doubt, explains a curious phenomenon uncovered by the researchers at Dartmouth University. There is no āstandardā way of treating back pain in the United States, or of treating many other conditions for that matter. On January 29, 2015 I went to their really good website (dartmouthatlas.org) to look afresh at the section called VARIATION IN THE CARE OF SURGICAL CONDITIONS. There they describe the problems:
Looking specifically at spinal fusion, I uncovered some observations that are hard to explain, given the fact that fusions have not been shownāin the best studies done to dateāto give people better results than less-risky, non-surgical treatment. Bear with me as I shift into nerd mode to give you some idea of the scope of the problem.
⢠The rate of spinal fusion operations for lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries age sixty-five and over increased 67 percent between 2001 and 2011.
⢠The average rate among regions in the U. S. during that period was forty-one per one hundred thousand, but the rate varied wildly and dramatically across the three hundred and six hospital referral regions. Bangor, Maine Medicare patients had nine procedures per one hundred thousand while Medicare patients in Bradenton, Florida had one hundred and twenty-seven. Stated another way, if you live in Bradenton you are fourteen times more likely to receive fusion as a treatment than if you live in Bangor! Here is a break down of the five highest and five lowest use regions in the U. S.
| Bradenton, FL | 127.5 |
| Grand Rapids, MI | 89.9 |
| Mason City, IA | 89.2 |
| Tyler, TX | 88.5 |
| Newport News, VA | 87.4 |
| Bronx, NY | 17.5 |
| Scranton, PA | 17.1... |