part 1
Old Testament, Ethics, Human Dignity:
Framing the Question
1
The Moral Trajectory of the Old Testament Drama:
Creation, Exodus, Exile
Bruce C. Birch, Wesley Theological Seminary
Introduction
The theme for the āRestorative Readings Conferenceā held in September 2013 at Stellenbosch University, South Africa, which offered the impetus for this book, brings together three categories: Old Testament, Ethics, and Human Dignity. That juxtaposition itself begins to bring focus to our conversation. Ethics connotes critical reflection on the moral dimensions of human experience. Such reflection encompasses both the character and the conduct of individuals or communities. Related to the Old Testament, interest in ethics may focus on discovering, understanding, and critically assessing the morality of ancient Israel. This enterprise would seek to discover the world behind the text. But the ethics of this ancient world can never be fully recovered or systematically described. We catch glimpses of the moral world behind the text, and can gain enriched understanding of particular moments and social contexts, but such glimpses reflect different moments and voices in a rich and diverse story that does not reflect any unified system of morality for ancient Israel that can be recovered.
The texts of the Old Testament have been passed on to us by processes in the ancient Israelite community that made judgments on witnesses that should be preserved and passed on to future generations. Another way of understanding the relationship of ethics to the Old Testament is to explore the world of the text created by the formation of canon. Although individual books may be studied for their moral witness (and at times diverse voices within single books), the formation of the canon sets up a larger conversation. There is a moral dialogue created by the existence of the canon itself that includes convergences, tensions, juxtapositions, continuities, and contradictions as ongoing generations receive the authoritative collection of witnesses, and engages those witnesses in light of the claim that these texts are Scripture handed on from generation to generation.
The introduction of a third category, i.e., a focus on āhuman dignity,ā makes clear that our concern is not simply with the morality of ancient Israel nor even the canonical witness as an end in itself. Human dignity is introduced as a moral category central to modern ethical challenges and placed as a social mandate in key documents such as the South African Bill of Rights and the United Nations Declaration of Universal Human Rights. We come together because, as Christians, we want to discover in our own Scripture the resources and the challenges that affect our engagement with the moral struggle for human dignity in todayās world.
When we bring a particular arena of moral concern, such as human dignity, to the Old Testament the tendency is to seek guidance for moral conduct. In other words, we ask the question, āWhat shall we do?ā Can we turn to the Old Testament as moral agents seeking guidance for ethical decisions, actions, and strategies that will promote and enhance human dignity in our contexts?
A significant segment of recent work on Old Testament ethics argues that we cannot. In a widely admired work, Eckart Otto has concentrated on legal and wisdom texts as the only literature in the Old Testament focused on explicit moral norms. He defends his focus on explicit moral texts as a protection from the collapse of Old Testament ethics into Old Testament theology or history of Israelite religion. But he further argues that these explicit moral texts are so closely tied to ancient social contexts in Israel that no āapplicationā of insights from Old Testament ethics on any direct line to ethical concerns today should be attempted.
It is certainly true that the Old Testament, even in explicit legal or wisdom guidance, cannot be used as a simple manual to make moral decisions for us as modern people of faith. But how Israel made such decisions, and the values and principles undergirding such decisions, can be meaningful for our reflection on the Old Testament as a resource for our own moral formation.
I want to argue, however, that our definition of ethics is often too narrow to allow us to fully claim the resources of the Old Testament for the moral life of Godās people today. Christian ethics is not simply concerned with moral conduct but also with moral character. Here the operative question is āWho shall we be?ā The focus is not on moral decisions but on moral decision makers, individuals, and communities. I propose that we are shaped as Godās people by the entire canon of Scripture handed on to us. We are shaped by the biblical story and its many different types of literature. We are shaped by witnesses in the text to Israelās encounter and relationship with God and to stories of success and failure in living faithfully within that relationship.
As important as the legal and wisdom traditions are to Old Testament ethics, the explicit moral guidance they give does not exhaust the moral resources of the Hebrew canon. Far larger portions of the Old Testament are taken up by narrative and prophetic traditions, and these unfold a dramatic biblical drama where the moral relationship of God and Israel are shaped in relationship that begins with creation itself. Narrative accounts and prophetic proclamation reveals dimensions of a moral vision that continues to shape the community of faith from Israel through many generations to our own life as the people of God today.
Given that the entire Old Testament canon is seen as a shaping moral influence on those who claim its story as their own, one could hardly attend to its entirety in a single essay. For the purpose of this essay I will sample this story and its power to shape our moral life at three crucial points: creation, exodus, and exile. We cannot engage in close exegetical treatment, but will instead point to some of the elements in these witnesses that can shape us as moral agents concerned for human dignity.
Creation
It is significant that the Hebrew canon opens with witnesses to God as creator of all things. The God we encounter in the opening chapters of Genesis is not Israelās God alone. The creator God in these chapters is universal in scope. Before the Old Testament begins to tell the story of Godās relationship to a particular people in promise and covenant it is important to encounter God as creator in relationship to all persons and all things. This universality of Godās relationship to all creation provides a framework for all of Israelās story as a particular people of God. To begin the biblical story with God as creator of all is a reminder that God cannot be claimed as identified with any segment of humanity over another.
At the end of each day in Genesis 1 God declares the goodness of creation, and in v. 31 God declares the entire creation to be āvery good.ā As I have argued elsewhere,
The Yahwist creation narrative of Gen 2:4bā25 makes clear that in the Hebrew concept all of creation is related. ×Öø×Öø× is not self-sufficient. A garden is provided for food and beauty (2:9). God declares that āIt is not good that the ×Öø×Öø× should be aloneā (v. 18). God first creates animals and then, out of the humanās own flesh, a companion (×¢Öµ×ֶר). The introduction of man and woman implies social existence in all of its possibil...