Part One
Why Preach Against Abortion
1
Whatâs At Stake?
A community which regards and treats its weak members as a hindrance, and even proceeds to their extermination, is on the verge of collapse. The killing of the weak for the sake of others hampered by their weakness can rest only on a misconception of the life which in its specific form, and therefore even in its weakness, is always given by God and should therefore be an object of respect to others.
âKarl Barth
During one of our regular meetings over coffee, John, a friend of mine who pastors a local church, told me he was feeling a burden to tell his congregation about the horrors of abortion. âI just donât know where to start,â he confessed. âItâs such a delicate and controversial subject. I donât want people to think Iâm getting on some moral high horse and passing judgment. I donât want them to think this is nothing more than me on my soapbox. But at the same time . . .â His voice trailed off. âI donât know. Itâs just . . . I think abortion is wrong. I know it is. I think I need to do something about it. I want to. I know I need to preach on it. But I just donât know where to begin.â
Where to begin. Thatâs the subject of this chapter. If youâre like my friend John, you may be feeling an increasing weight of conviction to preach against abortion, but are unsure of where to start. The best place to begin is by getting educated, and that starts with learning about the issue. The theme song to the old G. I. Joe cartoon series was right. Knowing is half the battle. And preaching against abortion is to enter into a battlefield of ideas and the emotions that come with them. We need to be well-equipped.
This means you need to have at least a rudimentary knowledge of embryology and fetal physiology. Donât be concerned if you donât have a science degree. You donât need to be a doctor or a biologist to be able to read and understand the relevant medical literature. Whatâs more, excellent resources written for lay audiences abound. In addition to the scientific facts, you should also be familiar with the socio-cultural world of those who choose abortions. Who gets them and why? And finally, youâll need to be familiar with some of the most common pro-choice arguments and how to refute them. As you begin preaching against abortion, the same questions and objections will come up again and again. You need to know how to address them.
Certainly, you donât need to be an expert in any of these areas. But you do need to be informed. Here are just a few reasons why:
1. The more you know about the issue, the more credible youâll be. Your congregation may look to you as the resident expert (or at least an informed thinker). They want to trust what you have to say.
2. Someone listening to you may challenge you after the sermon. You need to be ready to respond.
3. Learning about abortion will lead you to understand more about the women who have them, why they have them, and offer ideas on homiletic approaches you might, otherwise, not think of.
4. If youâre going to empathize with your listeners, a good number of whom will have had at least one abortion, itâs helpful to learn about what they went through and continue to endure, both physically and emotionally.
5. The better you understand the issue, the better youâll be able to love and serve your congregation and the unborn.
There is a lot to know about abortion, and those of you just getting started may feel overwhelmed. Take heart. This chapter will help you get oriented.
Embryology and Fetal Physiology
The argument that abortion should remain legal because biologists arenât sure when human life begins is bunk. Life begins at conception. Embryologists are in complete agreement about this. A survey of the leading textbooks bears this out. âThe infant develops progressively from the single-cell fertilized egg to a highly complex multicellular organism,â writes Susan Tucker Blackburn. âThe genetic constitution of the individual is established at the time of fertilization.â Translation: life begins as a single-cell and, if not interfered with, develops in complexity into multicellular life. But there is no change in species. Our DNA is determined at conception. It doesnât change over time. Blackburn is hardly alone in her assessment. âHuman development is a continuous process,â say Keith Moore and T. V. N. Persaud, âthat begins when an oocyte (ovum) from a female is fertilized by a sperm (or spermatozoon) from a male.â On the beginning of individual human life they say:
Birth is certainly a milestone. We note it on birth certificates and celebrate it each year. But birth does not mark the beginning of human life. In case thereâs any doubt that this is what Moore and Persaud mean, they make their claim explicit: âA zygote [which results from the union of an oocyte and sperm] is the beginning of a new human beingâ and âThe intricate processes by which a baby develops from a single cell are miraculous.â Miraculous! Their point is not to be missed. Your life didnât begin eight weeks after you were conceived. Or six months after you were conceived. And it certainly didnât begin when you were born. You began as a single cell.
Human lifeâhowever small, however undevelopedâbegins at conception. To say it doesnât is to be ignorant of the facts. Moreover, to acknowledge that life begins at conception but then to say that the still-developing life of the embryo or fetus is less valuable or significant than that of the pregnant woman is to misunderstand that development is a continual process. Yes, itâs true that a fetus is less developed than a newborn infant. But the newborn is less developed than a toddler, who in turn is less developed than she will be as a teenager. Physical development, to say nothing of psychological and spiritual growth, continues long after birth. And this development commences once sperm fertilizes egg. Consider, for instance, that by day eighteen of conception the embryoâs nervous system and cardiovascular system already begin to develop. By day twenty-four the digestive, skeletal, vascular, and genitourinary systems are forming. Arm and leg buds appear by day twenty-eight, by which time the respiratory system has also begun developing.
This is why embryologists Ronan OâRahilly and Fabiola MĂźller suggest, âThe status of the early human embryo is an evaluation rather than a scientific question.â Those who disagree on abortion do so based on differences of belief over the value and worth of the unborn child and the role God plays in pregnancy, not whether or not the child is alive. Consider, for instance, the candid confession of a doctor in Nebraska who performs late-term abortions. Heâs honest about the evil that he does. âWe do kill fetuses. It dies because we give an injection into the fetus that causes the heart to just slowdown.â We do kill fetuses. We kill them. They die. The science is indisputable: life begins at conception. The fetus is most definitely human. What is being debated in the public realm is how to define terms like âhuman beingâ and âperson,â and what value to...