Part I
The Hebrew Bible and Motherhood
1
Lotās Daughters and Tamar
Mothers Positively Reimagined in Genesis Rabbah
Shayna Sheinfeld
Introduction
In Genesis, stories of deception by women are a fairly common trope: three separate times the wives of the patriarchs lie about their relationships with their husbands while sojourning in a foreign land in order to keep their husbands safe (Gen 12:10ā20, 20:1ā18, 26:1ā17); Lotās daughters use alcohol to impede Lotās senses in order to gain offspring by him (Gen 19); Rebekah tricks Isaac into giving her favorite (younger) son, Jacob, the blessing intended for the firstborn Esau (Gen 27); Rachel steals her fatherās teraphim, hiding them in her saddlebags and sitting upon them while feigning menstruation (Gen 31); and Tamar deceives Judah into having sex with her after he denies her his last son through a levirate marriage (Gen 38). Two of these instancesāthe Gen 19 account of Lotās daughters and the Gen 28 story of Tamarāfocus on the use of deceptive tactics to become pregnant and achieve motherhood. While the narratives as told in Genesis are neutral in terms of casting judgment upon these characters seeking motherhood, they are reimagined in midrashic interpretation with a decidedly positive spin.
This chapter examines the characterization of Lotās daughters in Gen 19:30ā37 and of Tamar in Gen 38, both of whom use deceptive means in order to become mothers. These women are re-characterized in the early midrashic collection known as Genesis Rabbah, where they are portrayed as righteous despite their wiles. This rabbinic corpus is sympathetic to the plights of these mothers-to-be, providing justification for their subversive actions because the end result is considered Godās willāthe male offspring produced by both Lotās oldest daughter and by Tamar eventually lead to the Davidic dynasty and therefore will also one day lead to the messiah. These narratives from Genesis and their reception in the midrash show howāeven though these mothersā choices are incongruent with what one might expect from women in the Torahāaccording to the midrash, the end result justifies the deceptive means by which each mother acts. Genesis Rabbah makes sense of the subversive way Lotās daughters and Tamar reach motherhood by turning potentially negative stories of women into stories of motherhood that will ultimately lead to the messianic redemption of the Jewish people.
Lotās Daughters (Gen 19:30ā37)
Lot, the nephew of the patriarch Abraham, lived with his family in a city called Sodom. Along with Gomorrah, Sodom was to be destroyed by God on account of its wickedness (Gen 18:16ā33). Lot is saved because he invites strangers into his home; these strangers are identified as the angels (malak) sent to destroy the city (19:1ā11). At the angelsā urging, Lot and his family escape with the caveat that the family is not to look back toward the city (19:12ā17). Once Lot and his family have left, God destroys Sodom and Gomorrah with sulfur and fire (19:24ā25). Lotās wife is turned into a pillar of salt after she looks back toward the destruction (19:26). Left with only his two daughters and frightened by the experience, Lot removes himself and his daughters to live in a cave in the hills, far away from any civilization. Lotās daughters are concerned about their solitude and the possibility of preserving humanity, so they decide to get their father drunk and have intercourse with him with the goal of getting pregnant:
The firstborn names her son Moab, a boy who is said to have become the ancestor of the Moabites (19:37), while the younger daughter bore a son named Ben-Ammi who is said to have become the ancestor to the Ammonites (19:38).
In later analyses of the women in this narrative, the daughters of Lot are given short shrift, since the emphasis is on their mother, who is turned into salt in Gen 19:26. However, it is with this particular portion of the story that our analysis begins. At issue in this discussion is the latter half of the narrative in which Lot removes himself and his daughters from society. The concerns of the elder daughter, who is the only one of the two daughters to speak, are twofold. First, she is concerned that their father is old and therefore that he may die soon. Second, she worries there are no other available men besides him, and thus with his death there will be no men at all with whom the daughters could possibly conceive. Tammi Schneider notes that although it is not initially clear whether the daughters think they are indeed the last three humans or whether they simply do not have access to other men, the use of the verb for giving the father wine also means to irrigate the ground. Thus, the daughters do not simply intend to pour their dad a glass of wine but to fully āsaturateā himāthat is, get him very drunk. While the narrative in Genesis does not lay specific blame on any party for this incestuous encounter, the description of the daughters inebriating their father in order to carry out their plan suggests that Lot plays a passive role in the events that transpire; the general sense of the narrative implies the same conclusion. However, the daughters seem to make the choice to get their father drunk not only to commit incest but specifically in order to propagate the human race. āThe young women were concerned with the future of the race, and they were resolute enough to adopt the only desperate measure that appeared to be available.ā Thus, their goal does not seem to be simply sex or revenge....