Part 1
Scriptures and Theology
1
Light and Sight in Interfaith Theology and Ethics
Kenneth L. Vaux
Introduction
Our Project Interfaith finds birth today after nearly a year of planning. We begin with a spectroscopic view of the issues explored in our inaugural workshop on Light and Sight in interfaith perspective. We seek to scope out how the One God of all Truth and Life illumines this world and its peoples of faith. If the Semitic/Hellenic faiths of Abrahamâalong with the cognate faiths of Africa, India, China, and other regions of the worldâare theologically valid and their witness is ethically virtuous, then such biblically animated divine illumination will shine as we illumine each other, will forgive us as we forgive one another, feed us as we feed each other, and redeem us as we acknowledge and prompt redemption in one another.
We meet here in Chicago, the inaugural host city of the Council for a Parliament of the World Religions, and in Evanston, host city of the 1954 World Council of Churches whose theme was âChrist: The Light of the World.â We seek to stand in that heritage in which mutual consultation and service brings radiance to this dark world as âwe let our light so shine that the world may see our good works and glorify our heavenly Fatherâ (Matt 5:16).
The workshop, like a symphony, flows in three movements. In the first movement, we seek to lay down fundamental structures, purposes, and convictions. Following this introductory essay, we will rehearse the strains of Jewish, Christian, and Muslim interfaith theologies. The Christian refrain, presented by Northwestern Medievalist Barbara Newman, gives us a window into the Christian picture of faith and devotion as depicted by Hildegard of Bingenâin her conviction that God is âLiving Light.â Hildegard expressed these perceptions of God in texts, songs, and artistic drawings in that age of Camelot insight and interfaith awareness. âLiving Light,â Newman contended, drew on biblical understanding, yes, but principally on classical, Neo-Platonic, and Aristotelian metaphysical and theological understandings of God and human life. The membrane between those two Weltanschauungen, of course, is very porous, especially if we define a biblical worldview in inter-Abrahamic terms.
Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern, the Russian historian and Northwestern chair of Jewish Studies, then walked us through an advanced Yeshiva tutorial on the biblical-Talmudic, then midrashic unfolding of the motif of Divine light. His thesisâthat a minor theme in J, E, D, and Pâthe authorial strands of Torah as understated in Heschelâs first three Judaismsâbiblical, rabbinic, and Talmudicâthen becomes pronounced in Hasidic and Kabbalistic renditions of the faith. In the discussion that followed, Shternâs star light and his parlance was most illuminatingâthe reader will noteâas he waxed lyrical on the themes of color, green in particular, in the inner sanctum of holiness.
Souleymane Bachir Diagne, one of our worldâs eminent philosophers of Islam and science, delighted his audience with the florid light-brilliance of Muslim theology as seen by Sufi eyes.
Movement two in this first symphony of Project Interfaith is a collage of artistic renderings ranging from ophthalmologist Kim Curnynâs moving screen of sight grounded in biblical narrative and clinical care around the worldâto the challenging words about the indispensable vitalities of faith in university, seminary, and community by Northwestern President Morton Schapiro and Garrett-Evangelical President Philip Amersonâand respondents from that clergy community. Concluding the day were moving analyses of the light afforded by brush and film from frere Richard Vaux, a New York iconographer, and his sister-in-law, Sara Anson Vaux, whose sketch of valences of light and shadowâboth in texture and themeâin Clint Eastwoodâs Gran Torino climaxed a varicolored splendor as twilight descended on day one.
Movement three: On day two, the reach of the palate extended into the African Rain Forest, reflections on the Genesis-Johannine light theology by Northwestern and Garrett scholars Bill Murphy and K.K. Yeoâfollowed by Wendy Donigerâs masterful culminating discussion of sight (faith and natural knowledge) in Indian philosophy and religion. The Mircea Eliade Professor at the University of Chicagoâauthor of three volumes of Hindu Penguin Classicsâsummarily suggested that Indian philosophy teaches us to doubt what we see, while Indian theology trains us to believe what we see. Even here in the cradle of human spirituality, we see the reciprocity and complementarity of philosophy and theology as the twin pillars of criticality and credibility. The careful reader will find in this two-day symposium a primer for and a vision into the interfaith horizon of extraordinary color and valueâmaterial and mental.
What Is Light?
In this symposium, and in the broader project, the first issue before us is whether Light is material (scientific), metaphoric (metaphysical), moral (ethical) or all of the above. We begin with a discussion of the theological science of light.
One of my first theological teachers was Tom Torrance. Perhaps the best class I had with him was not Systematic Theology the year I spent in Edinburgh, when Barthâs Dogmatics started to come into English from T&T Clarkâin part from Tomâs able translating hand. Nor was it the junior-high class at the wee kirk I served as minister in Whitecraig, Midlothian. I invited Torrance to lecture to the young people one evening. He spoke on Athanasius and the Trinity to what appeared to be a raptly attentive audience. Itâs amazing what respect the Moderator of the Church of Scotland commands, even among teeny trainspotters. My greatest learning, though, came some years later in the three days we spent together stranded in Kennedy Airport, waiting to return to LondonâTorrance to Auld Reekie and me to Oxford to continue a sabbatical. The four feet of snowâdrifting to more than 40 feet and covering the air terminal buildingsâafforded us some wonderful conversations that were tinged by the thrill and terror of apocalyptic atmosphere toward which we both tended in our Augustinian theologies.
Before this 1983 blizzard, reenacted in 2010, Torrance had already produced fine work in theology and science. He wrote an edition of his neighbor James Clerk Maxwellâs The Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field and its theological interpretation, intrigued as he was in the pioneer scientistâs insistence that created light and uncreated Light constituted one continuum. Interfaith monotheistic theology had affirmed this analogical truth for millennia. Torrance had not yet won the Templeton Prize or ventured into the remarkable set of books that included Divine and Contingent Order, The Christian Frame of Mind, and Reality and Scientific Theology. I have reviewed his work in An Abrahamic Theology for Science, one volume in the interfaith series I have prepared for my classes over the last 20 years.
Ten years after Maxwellâs incisive formulae were presented, Einstein followed with his earth-shaking summarial work of quantum theory and general relativity. Then, in the spring of 1921, he reluctantly came to the U.S. and was greeted as a rock star. This naĂŻve puritan society so enamored with hopeâespecially Miltonian exuberance in science and technology and an all-too-readiness for eschatological warâsaw only paradise regained in this frock of snowy hair. Both his N...