The Pith of the Apocalypse

Essential Message and Principles for Interpretation

Rainbow

• Publisher: Wipf and Stock
• Year: 2008
• eBook ISBN: 9781498275187
• Topic: Theology & Religion
• Subtopic: Religion

To serve God and Christ faithfully in the midst of a pagan society that exalts power, wealth, and pleasure is the tenor of the prophetic summons to the church in the book of Revelation. Unfortunately, this simple message, as potent today as it was at the end of the first century, is often obscured by misguided, if sincere, interpreters. The present book explores the background issues and lays out the principles that inform a sound approach to this enigmatic writing: its historical and cultural setting, its literary structure, its symbolic code, its core theological concepts, its scheme of last things, and its preachable and teachable points. In dialogue with dispensationalism on the one hand and with the skeptical criticism of it on the other, The Pith of the Apocalypse derives clues for cracking the Apocalypse from the book itself, viewed against the sweep of the biblical prophetic tradition that flowed into it, through the lens of methods widely accepted in mainstream New Testament scholarship. Readers will return to the book of Revelation itself with enhanced confidence, penetration, and understanding.

1

Invitation to the Revelation

Wrapped in some of the most graphic imagery of the Bible, the book of Revelation conveys a vital message of warning and encouragement. It takes us behind the stage of earthly temptations and troubles to disclose the divine Majesty whose plan for the ages is unfolding inexorably toward the goal he has pre-ordained, and lets us see the total victory Jesus has already staked out over our direst foes, even over death itself. It sternly admonishes Christians not to participate in the hubris of society, while holding out promises of extravagant rewards for humble followers of the Lamb who find themselves forced along the way to pay the price of social ostracization or martyrdom.

Bracing though this message is, it is neglected by many potential readers. The forte of the writing, its vivid picture language that strikes viscerally and memorably, makes it a playground for eager interpreters. While most attempts to explain the Apocalypse have been sincere, their results have scarcely been in agreement. Put off by strident views and equally dogmatic counters on the part of reputed experts on biblical prophecy, large numbers in the pews turn away from the Revelation in perplexity or outright distaste. Others, less savvy, get drawn into one school of interpretation (such as dispensationalism, the theological system behind countless radio sermons, the best-selling The Late Great Planet Earth1 and the Left Behind Series novels2), perhaps unaware that options for interpretation exist that are arguably more faithful to the original intent.3

Nevertheless the gist of this enigmatic book can be understood, and it is rapidly coming to light in the main stream of recent scholarship on the New Testament. During the course of the twentieth century, biblical specialists came to share a common set of interpretive methods, and made signal advances in exploring the Bible against the backdrop of the ancient Near Eastern, Jewish, and Greco-Roman environments in which its constituent books were written. Not every riddle in the Apocalypse is solved. But by making some reasonable assumptions at the outset we can clarify the main lines along which a responsible interpretation of the Revelation must move.

Assumptions

A sound framework for understanding the Apocalypse begins with the following assumptions, gleaned from the book itself, especially from the superscription (1:1–3).

1. The book of Revelation belongs to the category of inspired scripture and deserves to be read by the church as part of the canon of sacred scripture.

In the first sentence the author tells us he received the matter from God by the agency of an angel, making it “the word of God” and “the testimony of Jesus Christ” (1:1–2), motifs that crop up again toward the end (19:10; 22:16, 20). While he was “in the Spirit” (1:10), he heard oracles of the risen Christ (2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 14), each spoken by the Spirit (2:7, 11, 17, 29; 3:6, 13, 22). Later came an invitation to ascend into heaven and view things about to transpire on earth, at which immediately he was “in the Spirit” again (4:1–2; cf. 17:3; 21:10).4 Throughout the book the author reports frequent interactions with angels (6:1–8; 7:13–14; chap. 10; 11:1–2; 17:1–3, 7–18; 19:9–11; 21:9–10, 15, 22:1, 6, 8–11). Again and again he is told to write down what he is hearing and seeing (1:11, 19; 2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 14; 14:13; 19:9; 21:5; contrast 10:4). In summary statements the words of the prophecy are declared faithful and true (19:9; 21:5; 22:6). At the end stands a threat not to tamper with the text (22:18–19). How could the author have laid stronger claim to divine inspiration?

Merely to lodge a claim is not, of course, to establish it. Other apocalyptic writings of the same era were not canonized. But already within the next generation, copies of John’s Apocalypse were being circulated and studied in Asia Minor (modern Turkey) among some who had known the author there face to face.5 Justin Martyr, among the earliest ecclesiastical authors, referred to it.6 Within a century or so after publication it was being cited in places as widely distributed geographically as Gaul (modern France),7 Rome,8 western Syria,9 and Alexandria in Egypt.10 While its abuse by Montanists and other millennarian sects looking for an earthly vanity fair led some individual church leaders to react against it,11 by the end of the fourth century most doubts had been dispelled.12 For the last sixteen centuries the book of Revelation has held an honored place in the canon of New Testament scriptures accepted by Roman Catholics, the Eastern Orthodox, and Protestants alike.13

It pronounces seven blessings upon those who read and keep what it says (1:3; 14:13; 16:15; 19:9; 20:6; 22:7, 14).14

2. The Apocalypse was designed to communicate, not to obfuscate.

For many Christians, to read the book of Revelation is to enter a bizarre world. What are the plethora of images meant to denote? But by superscribing the work an “apocalypse”—according to some translations, a “revelation”(1:1)—the author indicated his intent to make his burden plain rather than obscure. The noun apokalypsis is a compound of two Greek roots, apo “away,” and kalyp- “to cover.” It points to the process (-sis) of taking the cover off something, an unveiling.

Further along in the opening verse, two verbs indicate what kind of communication the book contains. “To show” (dei=cai, deixai) is to point to a visible object. “To make known” (shma~nai, sēmanai) is to use a sign. Both verbs state what is obvious in any case, that the work makes generous use of symbolic language. It does so in the interest of letting the reader see.

Yet if John wished to make himself clear, why adopt such an esoteric mode of speech? John and his implied readers stood in a literary tradition rooted in the Hebrew scriptures. Israel’s historical saga, legislation, poetry, and prophecies, driven deep by a Jewish rearing so as to become the presuppositional grid through which John construed reality, formed the stockpile of known material upon which the divine Spirit played to awaken in his mind glimmers of the unknown future. There is no dilemma whatsoever between John’s claim to have experienced fresh visions, and the fact that his record of those visions is a tissue of allusions ranging over the whole of the Old Testament. The dense language of the Revelation will cease to be an obstacle to modern Christians, to the extent that we too familiarize ourselves with that literary heritage, especially key parts of Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, and Zechariah.15 When John’s symbols evoke past associations in the new patterns into which he presses them, his writing gains a luminosity and a punch it could never have packed had he written in a vacuum.

3. The book of Revelation is a book of prophecy in the tradition of the Hebrew prophets.

John designates his writing a “prophecy” (1:3; 22:7, 10, 18, 19), and his own activity of delivering it, “prophesying” (10:11). Yet what establishes its contribution to the prophetic literature of the Bible is not so much these explicit self-descriptions, as the degree to which the entire opus takes over and reworks language, imagery, issues and conceptions from the oracles of the Old Testament. Indeed, the book gives the impression of a de...

Table of contents

• Title Page
• Preface
• Acknowledgments
• Note on Abbreviations
• Chapter 1: Invitation to the Revelation
• Chapter 2: Situation of the Recipients
• Chapter 3: Literary Structure
• Chapter 4: Cracking the Code
• Chapter 5: Main Theological Concepts
• Chapter 6: Eschatology
• Chapter 7: Preaching and Teaching It
• Bibliography