Identities, Allegiances, and Theological Reflections
1
Thinking Theologically about Identity and Allegiances:
Emmanuel
Do not conform yourself to this age, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect. (Rom 12:2)
Introduction: Nyamata, 1998
The question of identity, allegiance, and being a Christian is not a speculative theological question. It is a concrete and urgent question, particularly in our time, living as we are after the 1994 Rwandan genocide. In less than a hundred days, close to a million Rwandansâmostly Tutsisâwere killed by their neighbors and countrymen (mostly Hutus). The greatest irony of this genocide of our time is that it happened in one of the most Christianized countries in Africa, where at least 70 percent of the population was Catholics and 15 percent Protestant. This means that almost all of the victims and their killers were Christians, who had been baptized and often worshipped in the same churches where a number of the killings took place. The church of Nyamata was one such killing field. I visited the church of Nyamata in the summer of 1998, on my first visit to Rwanda after the genocide. Even though it had been four years since the genocide, the empty church carried fresh memories of what had happened here. The corrugated tin roof was pierced by bullet holes and bore visible bloodstains; the church basement, accessible down steep steps in the back, had been converted into a permanent catacomb. On either side of its very narrow hallways were racks of skulls, bones, coffins, and personal belongings of the more than eight thousand people who had been killed inside the church. The expansive main area of the church was empty. The altarâs white sheet covering still bore bloodstains. The tabernacle stood wide open; the marble baptismal font was chipped in a number of places, obviously by machetes intended for some of the victims.
As I stood in horrified silence in the empty church, a number of questions ran through my head. How could this have happened in this beautiful and deeply Christian country? Why was the Catholic Church never able to provide a bulwark against the slaughter of Rwandans by their neighbors, being instead, as some cases indicated, a contributing factor in the killing? The fact that the genocide started during Easter week added more irony and contradiction. For obviously, many of the victims had celebrated Christâs Resurrection from the dead, thus becoming the first fruit of Godâs new creation, here in this very church, together with the killers. Was all the talk of new identity, new life with Godâwords that describe the life of the Christianânothing but mere spiritual platitudes that actually meant very little in the ârealâ world? What, then, is the relationship between oneâs biological, national, racial, or ethnic identity and the reality of baptism? Does the blood of tribalism run deeper than the waters of baptism?
I begin with the vivid memory of Nyamata for two reasons. First, it is to make the point that any reflection about identity, allegiance, and being a Christian cannot proceed in an abstract fashion. It must always draw attention to a particular place (America, Africa, Rwandaâto the extent these notions are places) and begin by paying attention to the contradictions within which Christians find themselves as they engage the politics of their nations. But I also begin with the memory of Nyamata because it is now clear that what happened in Rwanda in 1994, while extreme and particularly intense, is by no means exceptional. For as Michael Budde notes, Christians readily kill other Christians in service to the claims of state, ethnicity, or ideology. Moreover, such killing has become so commonplace that we no longer see this as a scandal to the Christian gospel. That is why Rwanda does serve well as a mirrorâindeed, as a metaphorâfor the modern forms of tribalism that habituate Christians to live in ways that assume that bonds of tribalism, nationalism, racism, or ethnicity run much deeper than the waters of baptism. Accordingly, reflecting on Rwanda might provide us with much-needed lessons for learning how to think theologically about identity and belonging in our time.
Learning to Think Theologically about Identity: The Dialectical Task
Learning to think theologically about identity involves two interrelated tasks, an intellectual as well as a practical one. These interconnected tasks are nicely captured by Paulâs words in his letter to the Romans, when he warns his audience, âDo not conform yourself to this age, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfectâ (Rom 12:2).
Time and occasion do not allow us to get into the historical, hermeneutical, and literary issues connected with Paulâs letter to the Romans and this particular recommendation. What is clear is that, comprised of both Jewish and Gentile Christians, the church of Rome experienced some âtensions.â In writing this encouraging letter to the Romans, Paul highlights the new life of hope and freedom in Christ that Godâs love has given to all through Godâs unmerited justification. As bearers of this new life, Roman Christians must learn to think of themselves in a ânewâ wayânot as Gentile and Jewish in the first place, but as Godâs new people, made such through Godâs unmerited grace. It is within this context that he urges them to ânot conform to this ageâ but to live transformed lives. What is of particular significance for us here is the way that Paul suggests that Roman Christians might be able to go about the business of âbeing transformed.â They do so, according to Paul, in two interconnected ways. First, it is by the ârenewal of your minds.â What Paul recommends here is not a one-time âmaking upâ of their minds but a ârenewal,â which is to say an ongoing (trans)formation of their minds, which is realized through cultivation of the relevant habits of mind. This renewal is about developing the necessary mental capacities and categories to enable them to think rightlyâthat is, in a manner consistent with their new status as Godâs people, made thus not through the law (the old categories) but through Godâs grace.
Second, Paul shows that learning to think properlyâwhile it is about developing the right mental capacities and categoriesâis not a detached intellectual exercise. Rather, it is dialectically connected to, and at the same time made possible by, relevant patterns of living. It is connected with the ability to âdiscern what is the will of God, what is pleasing, perfect, and true.â The key term here is âdiscern,â which various translations render differently: âto test and approve what Godâs will isâ (New International Version); âto learn and know Godâs willâ (English Standard Version); âto prove what the will of God isâ (New American Bible).
What the various translations confirm is the practical dimension of discernment as a form of living out the will of God: what is good, acceptable, and perfect. Moreover, if these different expressions (âtest,â âlearn,â âknow,â and âproveâ) seem to reflect a certain tentativeness in Paulâs recommendation, they point to a crucial dimension of ad hoc discernment, experimentation, an ongoing negotiation of their new identity, which requires the formation of both relevant mental capacities and practical disciplines. These disciplines are at once as subversive (i.e., do not conform to the patterns of this world) as they are revelatory of what is good, pleasing, and perfect. Moreover, this way of understanding who they are and living in the world is a form of politics (âpoliticsâ here understood as the configuring of bodies in space and time). That is why, in the end, thinking correctly about Christian identity is about learning to see oneâs body as both the site of resistance and the revelation of that new reality of Godâs justification. Thus, in the opening words of Romans 12, which immediately precede the exhortation not to conform to this age, Paul states, âTherefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of Godâs mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to Godâthis is your true and proper worshipâ (Rom 12:1 NIV).
This is what learning to think theologically about identity, allegiance, and being a Christian is about. But I realize I have jumped ahead of myself. My intention in drawing attention to Paulâs exhortation to the Romans here was to highlight the two dialectical requirements of Christian identity: the cultivation of relevant mental capacities and categories on the one hand and, on the other, the formation of relevant practical skills and postures that enable one to negotiate oneâs Christian identity in the world. Let me now try to highlight each of these dialectical requirements by drawing some crucial lessons from the Rwandan genocide, so as to provide more concrete and specific suggestions of what these might look like for us today.
Christian Identity as âPoliticalâ Identity
Rwanda forced me to rethink issues of ethnicity and nationalism and, overall, the status of so-called natural identities. The way the genocide in Rwanda was explained by Western media (and governments)âa myth that was reproduced throughout the world, including in Africaâwas that the genocide in Rwanda was nothing but the playing out of age-old animosit...