chapter 1
Revelation, Faith, Doctrine, and Theological Authority
If we take seriously the conviction that election lies at the cor ecclesiae, at the heart of the church, we find ourselves at the center of the church’s faith when we focus on the question of election.
Predestination is the cause of our salvation, and therefore is of the utmost importance in theology; it is also the object of lively controversy.
Salvation and damnation are equally grounded in the ineluctable decision of God. . . . They do not, however, stand alongside each other having the same rank, for God’s universal saving will has been revealed in the gospel of Jesus Christ, whereas God’s no is a mystery withdrawn from human knowledge.
Theology, auditus fidei and intellectus fidei
The practice of Christian theology presupposes the principle that faith seeks a disciplined understanding (intellectus fidei) of the content of revelation. The role of the Christian theologian “is to pursue in a particular way an ever deeper understanding of the Word of God found in the inspired Scriptures and handed on by the living Tradition of the Church. He does this in communion with the Magisterium which has been charged with the responsibility of preserving the deposit of faith.” This book takes up the topic of the mystery of God in himself and his relationship with human persons, in short, divine election and human freedom. In other words, how do we reconcile God’s sovereignty of grace with human freedom, not just in general, but particularly with respect to the Church’s full understanding of God’s plan of salvation as a work of grace? Equally crucial to this study is the question of how do we reconcile God’s universal salvific will with the mystery of predestination, election and reprobation.
Divine election is a revealed truth, that is, salvation is a work of God. In this book, I shall reflect, in the light of reason, on this revealed truth and the received tradition and doctrines of the Christian faith. This principle of intellectus fidei is expressive of the dynamism of faith seeking understanding that is found in a correlation of faith and revelation. Inherent, then, within the very nature of Christian revelation is this principle because “rational persons are the beneficiaries of this revelation” who are “impelled by the Spirit of truth, to deepen their understanding of what they believe” (fides quae creditur). In short, says Ratzinger, “theological science responds to the invitation of truth as it seeks to understand the faith.” The corollary of this theological quest for insight is the auditus fidei—“Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God” (Rom 10:17). “Hearing the Word in faith” is followed up by the first theological act of attentive listening to the Word of God. The faith with which one believes (fides qua creditur) is an act of faith that is embedded in and flows from the theological virtue of faith. That virtue—which is a gift of God’s grace—is the permanent disposition in which the theological habit of mind is rooted. “Faith is the theological virtue by which we believe in God and believe all that he has said and revealed to us, and that Holy Church proposes for our belief, because he is truth itself.” This theological habit of mind properly orders the mind to the “knowledge that God has revealed in his Word to the church concerning himself and all creatures as they stand in relation to him.” The disciplined exploration of the content of revelation involves human reason illuminated by faith, attaining a certain understanding of the mysteries of faith.
Furthermore, the discipline of theology involves philosophy, indeed, a Christian way of philosophizing that is conceived and practiced in dynamic union with faith. God’s revelation discloses truth that exceeds human reason’s capacity, but it is not opposed to human reason. “Revelation in fact penetrates human reason, elevates it, and calls it to give an account of itself (cf. 1 Pet 3:15).” As John Paul II rightly notes: “Indeed without the help of philosophy theological issues cannot be clarified, as, for example, language concerning God, the personal relations within the Trinity, God’s creative activity in the world, the relationship between God and man, and the identity of Christ as true God and true man. The same applies in various assertions of moral theology, in which certain concepts recur, like the moral law, conscience, freedom, personal responsibility, guilt, and so forth, all of which are defined with reference to philosophical ethics.” In addition, the role of reason in doing theology therefore involves not only defending by reasoned argument the truths of revelation, but also demonstrating “the interrelationship between the various truths of faith. This too clarifies and expands the understanding of the truths related.” Here, too, John Paul is insightful: “”We ought above all to remember that the divine Truth ‘which is proposed to us in Holy Scripture understood in accordance with the teaching of the Church’ [Aquinas, Summa theologiae, IIa IIae, Q. 5, Art. 3 ad 2] enjoys its own natural intelligibility, which is so logically coherent, that it stands as an authentic wisdom.” The pope continues to explain the intellectual structure of Christian doctrine:
Yet, as the concluding sentence insists, the assent of faith isn’t just a matter of the internal coherence of the intellectual structure of Christian doctrine, but rather this assent is about participating in the mysteries of faith. In what sense, then, is faith a way of knowing divine reality, sharing in Christ’s Pascal Mystery, and how, as Romanus Cessario asks, “can propositions serve as true objects of faith, even though the act of faith finds its ultimate term in the...