Part 1
Presence in Creation
1
Experience of Word and Spirit in the Natural World
Denis Edwards
Do we experience God in our encounters with birds, animals, trees, forests, mountains, deserts, and beaches? Or, to focus the question of this chapter a little more precisely, does the Christian theological tradition offer support for the idea that we can experience the triune God in the natural world? Behind this question I think there are two further questions: is God the Trinity to be understood as really present in the natural world? If God is understood as present, is this presence of God something we can properly be said to experience?
I will take up these two questions with the help of two theologians of the tradition, Athanasius of Alexandria from the fourth century and Karl Rahner from the twentieth. In the first section of the essay I will explore a theology of Godās triune presence in creatures, in dialogue with Athanasius. In the second, I will seek to show that we can truly be said to experience this presence of God, building on Karl Rahner. The third section simply offers three examples of the experience of God the Trinity in the natural world.
The Presence of God in Creatures
Is God truly present in the natural world around us? When I walk on a quiet beach, can I see this beach as a place of divine presence? Can I think of a rain forest, with all its interconnected, exuberant forms of life, as filled with the presence of God? Some theologians, conscious of the costs of evolution, and the pain of many creatures, speak of the absence of God from the natural world. But I remain convinced we need to think of God as radically present, even in the loss and pain evident in biological life and in the costs of evolutionary emergence.
The Christian theological tradition has long been committed to the idea that God is radically present to all creatures, conferring on them their existence and their capacity to act within a community of creation. I will illustrate this statement by reference to Athanasius, a key figure in the full articulation of the theology of the Trinity. Reading him, there is the sense of a theology that is still young and vibrant. His view of the Trinity is radically scriptural. It is never abstract, but a theology of a God engaged with creatures, a God who acts, who creates and saves. I will focus first on his view of Godās presence to creatures, and then on his idea that creatures bear an imprint or image of holy Wisdom.
The Immediacy of God to Each Creature
Athanasius sees creation from the perspective of Jesus Christ and his life-giving cross. He sees the Word who is made flesh, the Word of the cross, as the very Word of creation. What John 1:3 says of the Word is foundational for all of his work: āAll things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being.ā The Word through whom all entities in the universe exist is the very same Word who is made flesh (John 1:14) to bring creation to its healing and transformation. The Word of creation is the Word of salvation.
Like others in the fourth century, Athanasius sees Christ not only as the Word of God but also as the Wisdom of God. He uses these expressions interchangeably, and interprets biblical references to the Word and the Wisdom of God intertextually. Athanasius is like many others in his own time in seeing God as creating through Godās Wisdom/Word. Where Athanasius differs from many of his contemporaries is in his conviction of the full divinity of both the Wisdom/Word and the Spirit. In fourth century-philosophical and theological culture, permeated as it was by Platonic thought, it was natural to suppose that there is a vast distance between finite creatures and the infinite God, and that some kind of intermediary is needed to bridge this distance. The tendency was to think of creatures as participating in an intermediary, and of the intermediary as participating in the all holy God. For the Christian community this intermediary was the Wisdom/Word. Behind this tendency there was a conviction of Godās complete otherness from creatures. There was an assumption that the all-holy God is not to be contaminated or demeaned by immediate contact with creatures. In any case, finite and vulnerable creatures might not be able to withstand exposure to the fire of the divinity. Some kind of buffer was needed.
It is understandable, then, that the Alexandrian priest Arius was convinced not only that the Word is an intermediary between God and creatures, but also that the Word is not to be identified with the all-holy God. In his view, there was a time when the Word was not. This means that the Word is ultimately a creature and that the true and eternal God is beyond the Word. Such a view was shared by many Christians, including influential bishop-theologians. The transcendent otherness of God seemed to rule out an immediate relationship between God and created entities.
Basing himself on his reading of the Scriptures and the Christian tradition, Athanasius completely rejects the notion of a created intermediary between God and creatures. For him there is no buffer. God is immediately present to the creatures that God creates. Athanasius shares fully in his opponentsā conviction of the radical otherness of the Creator. He has a highly developed theology of creation ex nihilo. Creatures have in themselves no reason for their existence. They exist only because the Creator confers existence on them at every point. For Athanasius, too, there is an infinite difference, an ontological gulf, between creatures and their Creator.
How is this gulf bridged? Not, for him, by a hierarchical chain of being linking Creator and creatures; and not, for him, by a created intermediary. He insists that the gulf is bridged only by the fully divine Word coming down to be present to creatures in the fully divine Spirit. Only God can bridge the gap. For Athanasius, the eternally divine Word of God is āpresent in all thingsā and āgives life and protection to everything, everywhere, to each individually and to all together.ā From the creaturely side, creation is an ongoing relation of participation, by which creatures exist securely only because they partake of this Word of God so profoundly present to them in the Spirit. Athanasius speaks of the Word of God as āgoverning,ā āestablishing,ā āleading,ā āproviding for,ā and āorderingā creation.
Athanasius writes of divine Wisdom as enabling all the diverse creatures and the elements of the natural world to work together in balance and harmony. Like a gifted musician, divine Wisdom brings the whole universe into a beautiful interrelationsh...