CHAPTER 1
Introduction
The Anemic Memento Mori of Our Contemporary Setting
Life. Merely speaking this word stirs emotions and conjures endless vibrant images of fullness and engrossing intricacy. One âwalks down memory lane,â reminiscing about the riches of life past. One talks of (or disregards) the dignity and the sanctity of life or of sharing oneâs life with another. Popular magazines and even board games are named in commemoration of life. Fittingly, much ado is made over each new life that enters the world; moreover, each such entrance is celebrated annually. Life is considered so precious that people enter covenants pledging not merely their bodies but their very lives as their most valuable collateral. Indeed, even the constitution of the United States of America rightly acknowledges life as a God given right to all people. No wonder life is so treasured.
The word death, on the other hand, does not exactly invite riveting discussion. Rather, because it conjures a host of reflections considered intruding and discomforting, conversation about the topic is awkwardly hurried away. This avoidance is common even in Christian circles, though followers of Jesus Christ have been admonished that their suffering of death may in fact be Godâs preferred will.
In the modern age (particularly in the west) where the grace of health care and medical advancements have eliminated many diseases and profoundly reduced the mortality rates of bygone history, the prevailing mindset concerning death is significantly different than even four generations agoânever mind that of Christâs newly founded Church Militant. In generations past (particularly the Middle Ages), death was contemplated coram Deo much more commonly because mortality rates were so high that virtually no one could escape having to think about death. The general expectation today is not that many loved onesâincluding oneâs own childrenâwill likely precede one in death. Rather, the expectation is the exact opposite.
So much of the ecology of death and dying has been relegated to sewers and subways of our society (where necessary utilities may be executed without obstructing the comforts and pleasantries of everyday life) that death has become a virtually unnoticed visitor. Many of our predecessorsâboth biblical and historicalâwould assert that such a pathos is both subtly and devilishly deceptive and to our own very great detriment. One early British ars moriendi, for example, voices its mournful sorrow over such a condition:
Reflecting on this same dismissiveness of death in our own day, Ray Anderson bemoans, âThere is an immensity about death which transcends the biological event of cessation of organic life. The rituals of evasion which surround the contemporary avoidance of death are not because death is considered trivial or incidental, but because we feel an inner sense of bankruptcy before this sacred, and impenetrable immensity.â David Stannard agrees that our culture is bankrupt of its capacity to dialogue with death because of the formerâs loss of a significant sense of transcendent reality. He warns that we currently live in a culture âin which virtually every individual can be replaced with such facility that his absence deeply affects at best only his most intimate relations. In a world bereft of ultimate meaning either in life or in deathâin which neither the community of the living nor the vision of a mystical but literal afterlife any longer provides solaceâmodern man, in the face of death, has been forced to choose between the alternatives of outright avoidance or a secularized masquerade.â Indeed, our contemporary culture is compelled by this spiritual anemia to treat contemplation of death in very much the same way Israel and her priests regarded the truth proclaimed to them by the prophet Zechariah: âthey refused to pay attention and turned a stubborn shoulder and stopped their ears from hearing.â
The absence of a proper contemplation of death and dying in our culture has resulted in a further and more insidious sickness; perhaps one may call it âbiolatryââthe idolizing of life. Human life is so idolatrously clutched (contrary to both the Bibleâs depiction of Godâs righteous and equitable love for human life, and the liberty with which Christ held even his own deityâcf. Phil 2:6) that little or no regard at all is entertained concerning either what comes after this life or the attention divine revelation gives to our end. Many have become mastered by this present life. They have contented themselves with finding sufficient human meaning and purpose merely in the âhere and nowâ such that when death occursâthat is, the robbing of that hallowed contentmentâthey react as though some grave injustice has been imposed in affront to our humanity. Here lies a most serious flaw with our view of life and death. Life does not belong to us to worship itâfor all intents and purposesâas we see fit. In grand scale, no greater ethic seems to be realized than the preservation of (human) life. Just consider how insulting people find the notion of the extermination of the human species. That notion, by the way, is not so insulting to the God who did just that, saving eight souls (Gen 6:23; 7:21â24; 2 Pet 2:5)! Rather than idolizing life, then, we should consider the reality that we are dust (Ps 103:14; Isa 40:17). The Lord of the cosmos gives and dismisses created human life as he sees fit (Ps 90:3â10). We should, rather, loosely hold our livesâwhich are not our own anyway, nor are they primarily for our own consumptionâwith the same dauntless composure that Jesus Christ possessed his deity (though that was indeed his own). That is, he did not consider his deity something to be âclutchedâ as though it could be taken from him (Phil 2...