Part One
Chapter 1
The Religious Tradition of Hospitality
Sacred elements have shaped hospitality since its ancient beginnings. Two prime examples are the major cultures in antiquity that influenced the development of Christian hospitality. The first is the Semitic culture of the ancient Near East as illustrated by the model of Abrahamic hospitality. Our focal text of Genesis 18:1–16 is one of the most accessible stories which scholars have drawn upon to reconstruct some beliefs and practices of the region. The second culture under study is the Greco-Roman hospitality drawn from the writings of the poet Homer and practices in the civic sphere during the time of the Roman Empire. Given the immense scope and diversity of these two cultures, we do not attempt to give a comprehensive description of ancient Near Eastern or Greco-Roman hospitality. Rather, the purpose is to sketch in broad strokes some of the religious elements of these two traditions that helped shape hospitality in the East and West, and ultimately in Christianity. The phenomenon of “divine visitation” features prominently in all three. After our historical exploration, we present valuable research on the roles of hosts and guests from the fields of anthropology and linguistics. This cross-disciplinary expedition will shed more light on the nature and purposes of ancient hospitality along with demonstrating its integral relationship to the sacred in antiquity.
Hospitality in the ancient Near East
The term “ancient Near East” is not a precise geographic region, but can be used to describe the area demarcated by the Black Sea, the Caucasus, and the Caspian Sea in the north, the Indian Ocean in the southeast, and the Red Sea and Sinai Peninsula in the south. Historically, beginning around 3000 BCE, this area included ancient Mesopotamia, Asia Minor, Syria-Palestine, and Egypt and corresponds roughly to what is called the Middle East in modern times.
The traditional society of the ancient Near East has been described as agonistic. This means that defensive or aggressive social interaction was used in order to counter natural elements beyond human control or hostile groups outside one’s own community. In such a context, the custom of hospitality provided a means of taking care of travelers in the harsh desert and nomadic settings while providing protection and honor for the household of the host in receiving guests from afar. Water, food, and shelter were essential provisions for those who were out of place, that is, away from their home base and without benefit of kith and kin.
Undoubtedly, traveling was dangerous in antiquity. The hostile environment was due not only to topography and climate but also to the need for travelers to move across ambiguous territory on friendly terms. Hospitality was a functional institution that allowed travelers safe passage from one location to the next, from daytime to nighttime, from exterior to interior spaces in a non-homogenous society. Strangers could expect the right to be hosted for up to three days. Afterwards, protection might be provided for a limited time, which for some tribes was “until the salt he has eaten has left his stomach.”
However, hospitality was not offered to every traveler or stranger. Certain groups like armies and traders, who were intentional wanderers with no fixed home base, were regarded with suspicion. Armies were considered a destructive threat while traders moved goods from one place to another. These transient groups who traveled in large numbers for protection were excluded from traditional hospitality. Instead, it was given usually to those with whom there was some extended kinship or tribal connection and from whom hospitality might be needed in the future.
Besides providing safe passage for travelers, hospitality offered another significant benefit—hearing from strangers who could share information about the different world from which they came. This broadening of horizons through welcoming strangers would have even greater consequences if it were discovered that the visitor came from another realm altogether, that is, from the heavenly places. Such is the case in the story of Abraham and the three visitors by the oaks of Mamre.
The ancient biblical figure of Abraham as a model of hospitality is shared by the three monotheistic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Abraham’s own background as a nomadic foreigner is remembered in his obedience to the call of God to leave behind his country and his people to go to an unknown land (Gen 12). As a stranger living in a foreign land thereafter, he is depicted as both the recipient and giver of hospitality. Moreover, the story of divine visitation to Abraham and his wife Sarah, found in Genesis 18:1–16, illustrates customs of hospitality in the ancient Near East and reveals its religious significance in Hebrew tradition.
In this passage, one vividly sees elements of ancient Near Eastern hospitality, which had been transformed by necessity into a highly esteemed virtue. Abraham shows eagerness to host by his running to meet the guests at the entrance to his tent. He uses formal language to invite the visitors to be his guests and he bows as a gesture of respect. Not only does he provide them with a place to rest, but he also gives them bread to eat and water for drinking and washing their feet. For the host to wash the feet of a visitor was to elevate the stranger to the status of guest. The guest was then under the complete care and protection of the host. Following these customary courtesies, Abraham assures them that he will not detain them further although they are welcome to remain as his guests. Upon learning that they will stay longer, he rushes to prepare a feast for them with the speedy assistance of his wife and servants. Next he brings out generous portions of the finest food and serves them personally, standing as a sign of honor while they eat.
Matthews constructs a model of protocol in ancient Near Eastern hospitality based on the story of Abraham and other Old Testament narratives, with the following features:
a. Hospitality offered by individuals or a community is based on a “zone of obligation,” or geographical boundaries within which a host is responsible for hospitality to strangers.
b. The initial invitation to hospitality is offered for a specified period of time by the male head of household or a male representative of the town, and this can be extended if mutually agreed upon by both host and guest.
c. The stranger may decline the offer ...