CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
Religio-Cultural Refugees: Changing, Yet Rooted in History
The Shonas believe that one’s history influences who one is and who one becomes, making the above statement important for them. They believe that one’s blood relations (extended family relations), as well as communal interpersonal relations and place of origin, have a great impact on one’s life.
Due to arbitrary boundaries imposed by the British in the 1800s, the Shona people are mainly found in Zimbabwe, and in some of its neighboring countries; the Shona are part of the Bantu African group. Bantus are known as such because of their similar history of origin and some common meanings of words in the Bantu languages. Zimbabwe is located on the southern central part of the African continent. Its independence was gained from White (British) minority rule in 1980. Zimbabwe, colonized by the British in 1890, was formerly named after Cecil John Rhodes, and was known as Rhodesia.
This book addresses issues within counseling, care and pastoral theology in the African context, specifically in the urban Shona context. The main argument of this book is that: in order for counseling, pastoral care and pastoral theology to be relevant in the contemporary Shona Christian context, counselors and pastoral caregivers serving in this context must be equipped with a psychodynamic and pastoral theological understanding of integrative consciousness.
The focus is on the contemporary African people, particularly on the upper middle class Shona. The contemporary Shona context requires new and relevant paradigms in counseling and pastoral theology of care to address problems experienced by those living in such a context. One of the main tasks of a counselor or pastoral caregiver is to help people self-define and claim an identity, partially marred by colonization and urbanization.
Intergenerational Cultural Trauma: The Works of Colonization
From the time when Zimbabwe was colonized as Rhodesia (1890), fears arose among the Shona people concerning the impact of colonization on their freedom, culture, and religious tradition. The British colonization of Zimbabwe was not achieved without resistance. Native indignation (from both Shona and Ndebele people) at the colonization of Zimbabwe resulted in rebellions in 1896 to 1897, formation of political parties, and ultimately a war of liberation (1965-1979), which led to independence in 1980. Mungazi, a Shona historian, notes:
The Victorian view or belief held that Europeans were superior to Africans and Africans were less human than the Europeans. The Europeans were to be lords over the Africans. Wherever colonization appeared, it had an ugly side to its face. Martin Brokenleg, writing for the North American context, says:
In other words, as much as the initial appearance of colonization seemed positive, it resulted in oppression and dehumanization of the Native peoples. Brokenleg goes further to say that the impact of colonization on the Natives in North America (similar to colonization in Africa), has caused intergenerational cultural trauma. He says:
Lambo, a former Deputy Director-General of the World Health Organization in Geneva, stated that the general African social emotional and economic situation exacerbates the problem of personal identity conflict:
Although Lambo is addressing the general African situation, this is also true of the Zimbabwean context. In the contemporary urban Shona Christian context, the younger and middle aged generations struggle, caught between the Western and the traditional cultures. The “upheavals and severe conflicts,” to which Lambo refers, result in personal identity conflicts brought about by the clash between Westernization and the traditional African cultures. Further, as Lambo notes, the problem of living in two or more cultures creates an “existential frustration” and “existential vacuum” in the lives of the Shonas. This generation has become that which I would call “a generation of religio-cultural refugees.” What this means is that the Shona African vacillates between two religio-cultures day in and out, and has no roots in any one of the particular religio-cultures. It is a “salad generation,” a mixing cultures and/or with no specific culture.
Muphree, a Methodist missionary and scholar who taught at what was known as the University of Rhodesia, quotes an anonymous statement he says was made in London on February, 17, 1962, by someone who was then the leader of the largest nationalist party from Zimbabwe:
In today’s urban Shona context, it appears that the indigenous culture has not been fully “resurrected,” but is going deeper “underground,” as the present generations are becoming more and more Westernized. Among scholars of African literature, African cultural studies, and some of the older generations, there was a fear that the Shona culture was disappearing. The expressed fear by the leaders in 1962 is increasingly becoming a reality; the blending for which the older generation had hoped seems to be occurring at the expense of the Shona culture. The younger generation is taking more from the European foreign culture than from the indigenous Shona culture. As will be expounded later, becoming caught between the Western and Shona traditional cultures creates confusion for the younger generation with regard to what it means to be a Shona, resulting in lack of clarity in terms of personal identity.
Gelfand, a medical doctor and professor fro...