1
The Heart Wants What It Wants
Joseph
āThe heart wants what it wants. Thereās no logic to these things. You meet someone and you fall in love and thatās that.ā
Thatās the great comedian and filmmaker Woody Allen, explaining how it was that he abandoned his wife Mia Farrow to take up with Farrowās adoptive daughter Soon-Yi Previn, whom he married in 1997. Allen is a very well-read man, so itās possible that when he said that, he was consciously or unconsciously channeling Emily Dickinson. In a letter to a friend written in 1862, Dickinson wrote, āThe heart wants what it wants, or else it does not care.ā
āThe heart wants what it wants.ā On the lips of Woody Allen, the words sound like a justification: human desire is mysterious, we are its helpless playthings. Donāt blame me, blame my heart. From the pen of Emily Dickinson the words sound more like a comment on how the heart, desire, eros, is close to the animating principle of what it means to be human. The heart wants what it wants, or else it does not care. The heart desires, or else we die. Human beings are lovers down to the very core. It is a deeply Augustinian insight: āYou have made us for yourself,ā writes Augustine on the very first page of the Confessions, āand our hearts are restless until they find their rest in you.ā So likewise Pascal tells us that āthe heart has its reasons, of which reason knows nothing.ā
The problem, of course, is that the heart often wants the wrong things. The heart wants what it wants. Not what is good, or courageous, or true, or of assistance to the neighbor, but that which feeds the fantasies of our desires. So we read in Genesis: āAnd God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continuallyā (Gen 6:5, KJV). The twentieth-century novelist and philosopher Iris Murdoch spoke of the āfat, relentless egoā and showed the human wreckage it causes in her dark, funny, and weird novels. The fat relentless ego: a good description of the human condition. We Christians have another name for the heartās evil imagining. We call it sin.
The Old Testament is ruthlessly honest about sinās empire, the way it plants its flag not just in the Gentile nations with their idols and abominable practicesāthat is only to be expectedābut in the midst of the covenant between God and Israel. Israel, Godās own beloved people, have sinned. They have dishonored the Torah and broken the covenant. They have answered Godās love with malice and injustice. The situation is dire. What is needed is not good intentions or promises to do better next time, or any other sort of halfway measure, but a radical new beginning: a new love, a new affection, a new obedience. We encounter this vision of the future in many parts of the Old Testament, but perhaps nowhere more powerfully than in Jeremiah 31:33ā34:
The covenant established on Sinai pointed the way, offered a vision of human life as it should be, showed what it might look like to live in peace with God and oneās neighbor, to be one of the āquiet in the land.ā This Godward shaping of human existence is what the Ten Commandments are all about. But in the new covenant of which Jeremiah speaks, obedience will come from within; it will be written on the human heart. The heart will indeed want what it wants, and what it wants will be good.
This series is about the Reformation of the sixteenth century, and maybe you were wondering when I would get around to talking about that. But you see, I already have. For notice something about the Jeremiah passage: it is in the form of a promise. There is no more reformational category than that. Protestant theologians from Luther to Barth to Robert Jenson have read Scripture as one long record of Godās promise-making and promise-keeping. Jeremiahās words were addressed to the Israel of his own day, teetering on the brink of exile. But they gesture forward to the day when Godās promises to Israel, to the nations, and to the whole world would be fulfilled in the sending of Godās own Son and the pouring out of the Spirit upon all flesh. The new covenant envisioned by Jeremiah is none other than the New Testament of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. It is simply the gospelāthe glad tidings that God has visited his people, not just to forgive sin or usher in the kingdom but to transform our hearts. There is no more profoundly reformational theme than that. The law in its unity with the gospel, the gospel as the true meaning of the law, the Spirit as the divine person who writes that law in our hearts so that we may love the Lord our God with all our heart, and with all our soul, and with all our strength; and our neighbors as ourselves. This is the gift God has given us in Jesus, who isāas Hebrews tells usāthe mediator of a new covenant, sealed with his own sprinkled blood.
If we had more time, we could play with this theme as it is discussed by John Calvin in his Institutes. Calvin wrote eloquently about the unity between the old and new covenants, despite their very real differences. Or we might explore how Karl Barth, in his doctrine of election, saw Jesus Christ himself as the eternal covenant of grace uniting God and humankind. But we do not have time in this brief reflection. So I will instead leave you with an image, drawn not from Calvin but from Luther. Lutherās personal seal consisted of a black cross on a red heart, resting on a white rose, the whole set against a field of blue and surrounded by a golden ring. The cross is black (Luther explains) because it puts to death our sin; the heart is redāits natural colorābecause the cross does not kill us but makes us alive; it perfects rather than destroys our nature. The white rose is the peace that comes to us through the gospel, while the blue field represents the joy that awaits us in heaven. The gold ring, finally, is the heavenly blessedness that lasts forever and has no end.
The heart wants what it wants. And in Christ our Lord, God has given us our heartās desire. May we take this gospel message out into the world that God has made, loved, and reconciled in the person of his beloved Sonāto whom, with the Father and the Holy Spirit, be glory forever and ever.
Scripture: Jeremiah 31:31ā34
Questions
1. What does it mean to say that the heart āis close to the animating principle of what it is to be human,ā or that human beings are ālovers down to the very coreā? How much control do we have over what we love?
2. What is meant here by āold covenantā and ānew covenantā? How are these covenants similar, and how are they different?
3. Why is the category of promise so important to our reading of the Bible? Why was it especially attractive to the Protestant reformers of the sixteenth century?
2
By Faith Alone
But What Exactly is Faith?
Judy
This year, around the world and across many denominations, the 500th anniversary of the Reformation is being recognized. For those of us studying or teaching theology, this is significant because we know how profoundly the Reformation affected the church. But how would you explain what was at the heart of the Reformation to someone who hadnāt studied it?
One approach might be to start with what are sometimes called the āfive solasā: five short Latin phrases that emerged to summarize the reformersā theological convictions about the essentials of Christianity.
1. Sola Scriptura (āScripture aloneā): The Scriptures alone are our highest authority.
2. Sola Gratia (āgrace aloneā): We are saved by the grace of God alone.
3. Solus Christus (āChrist aloneā): Jesus Christ alone is our Lord, Savior, and King.
4. Soli Deo Gloria (āto the glory of God aloneā): We live for the glory of God alone.
5. Sola Fide (āfaith aloneā): We are saved through faith alone in Jesus Christ.
The third chapter of Romans, like so much of Paulās letter to the Romans, speaks about faith. What exactly is this thing called faith and what difference does it make? We live in a culture in which āfaithā means to many people something between dogged positivity and wishful thinking. It is often seen as a feeling: rooted in the self, manufactured by the self, and useful (or harmful) to the self. Faith as it is described in Scripture, and so as understood by the reformers, is something far more substantive.
In the letter to the Romans alone faith is described as the root of obedience (Rom 1:5), an instrument of justification (Rom 3:30), and the pathway to righteousness (Rom 4:13).
Luther described faith this way: