The Gift of Death and the New Magic of Politics
Hegel and Tolkien on Sorcery and Secondary Worlds
The Gift of Death for the Bourgeois World, the Gift Stolen by the Machine
The Doom (or Gift) of Men is mortality,â Tolkien writes. Elsewhere he notes that not âeven Power or Domination is the real centre of my story. It provides the theme of a War, about something dark and threatening enough to seem at that time of supreme importance, but that is mainly a âsettingâ for characters to show themselves. The real theme is . . . Death and Immortality.â How important, then, that a reading of The Lord of the Rings is able to grant death and immortality their essential place in human life. In Christianity, death is a door; it marks the end of human life and the beginning of beatific immortality or the banality of damnation. Death, for Christians, does not first and foremost move human life toward a spirited support of the polis, but toward an emulation of the divine by which persons can anticipate the vita sanctorumâthe life of the saints.
Moderns have lost this sense of death because in modernity death is treated as âneither an ineluctable end that must be courageously confronted, nor the gateway to salvation; it is extrinsic and alien to life and ought to be resisted and overcome.â Taken as a whole, the modern project aims to overcome all limitations which nature âimposesâ upon human lifeâmost especially suffering and death. Thus the rise of technocracy, by which humanity tries to conquer the natural world and secure prosperity and preservation. In consequence, certain human virtues lose their worth. Consider courage, as important to Aristotle as it is to Beowulf. In modernity success comes through the inculcation of the virtues of business, as homo economicus (economic man) eclipses ZĂ´ion politikòn (man as a political animal). Revolutionary and totalitarian movements, especially since the start of the twentieth century, have sought to disrupt the hegemony of this bourgeois world, to end the reign of radical individualism.
Still further, âModernityâs initial premise that death is something to be overcome consequently makes power the crux of human life.â Tolkien mythologizes these problems of modernity. As he explains in his letters, the legendarium is largely concerned with âFall, Mortality, and the Machine . . . the will to mere power, seeking to make itself objective by physical force and mechanism, and so inevitably by lies.â
For the 19th century German philosopher G.F.W. Hegel, the unduly private economic interests of the bourgeois world can only be restrained and transcended through war. âWar reveals the hard but necessary truth that all possessions, including oneâs own body and life, are transitory,â a truth âobscured in modernity by the success of the liberal state in securing peace and opening up a realm for the proliferation of economic life.â
When Tolkien explains that âWarâ provides his legendarium with âsomething dark and threatening enough to seem at that time of supreme importance,â something which allows characters to âshow themselves,â by which he means demonstrate the classical and Anglo-Saxon virtues, he is thinking in a Hegelian mode. Through war the bourgeois hobbits become political animals. Through the War of the Ring their degenerated understanding of freedom morphs into âthe spirited fortitude necessary to maintain free institutions.â
And yet âwar as restraint and correctionâ is problematized by the development of modern warfare, which is in part what Tolkien references when he notes that his tale is concerned with âthe Machine.â The âMachineâ finds its most concentrated mythical expression in the Ring, which represents the âtruth that potency (or perhaps rather potentiality) if it is to be exercised, and produce results, has to be externalized and so as it were passes, to a greater or less degree, out of oneâs direct control.â This is not to claim, by the way, that the Ring is an allegory of, say, the nuclear bomb. To such a supposition Tolkien has already responded, stating that âOf course my story is not an allegory of Atomic power, but of Power (exerted for Domination).â But we risk no overly-allegorical misapprehension of Tolkienâs direct commentary on modern warfare, which comes in a January 1945 letter to his son Christopher. In a quasi-Hegelian note, he accepts that the âdiabolic hourâ of the current war which spells the âdestruction of what should be (indeed is) the common wealth of Europe,â âmainly created by Germanyâ may be ânecessary and inevitable.â And yet, he continues, âwhat a gloat! We were supposed to have reached a stage of civilization in which it might still be necessary to execute a criminal, but not to gloat, or to hang his wife and child by him while the orc-crowd hooted.â Still, the total destruction of Germany, made possible by modern warfare, Tolkien reads as âone of the most appalling world-catastrophes.â Well, he concludes:
In the face of this tyranny of the machines, Tolkien confirms Gillespieâs sense that, in the face of modern war, the individual capitulates to his impotence: âWell, well,â he writes to his son, âyou and I can do nothing about it. And that shd. be a measure of the amount of guilt that should be assumed to attach to any member of a country who is not a member of its actual Government.â
The rise of mechanical, and nuclear, and chemical warfare creates a situation wherein, âsince every individual is threatened with annihilation,â and âindividual self-sacrifice is meaningless in this situation,â modern war âexacerbates the individualismâ at the heart of bourgeois life. As Michael Gillespie perceptively contends, âMan is thus plunged into schizophrenia: one moment he forgets death entirely and is concerned only with his present pleasure and advantage; the next moment he recognizes its imminence and dedicates himself to abolishing the weapons ...