Section 1âThe Bible
Chapter 1âGodâs Relationship to Creation
O let the Earth bless the Lord : yea, let it praise him, and magnify him for ever.
O ye Mountains and Hills, bless ye the Lord : praise him, and magnify him for ever.
O all ye Green Things upon the Earth, bless ye the Lord : praise him, and magnify him for ever.
O ye Wells, bless ye the Lord : praise him, and magnify him for ever.
O ye Seas and Floods, bless ye the Lord : praise him, and magnify him for ever.
O ye Whales, and all that move in the Waters, bless ye the Lord : praise him, and magnify him for ever.
O all ye Fowls of the Air, bless ye the Lord : praise him, and magnify him for ever.
O all ye Beasts and Cattle, bless ye the Lord : praise him, and magnify him for ever.
âPrayer of Azariah
Yahweh as Creationâs Governor
A number of biblical passages are habitually cited to support the doctrine of a fallen creation, of which the most important are in the first three chapters of Genesis. However, before I deal with those in detail, it will be instructive to look at what the Bible says about Godâs relationship with the natural creation in our world as it isâthe world after the fall of humankind. I will deal with the usual key passages in the next chapter.
I propose to bypass, for the most part, Godâs relationship to human agency, although it is important in its own right, in order to concentrate on the nonhuman creation, which is the matter in question. In Scripture, Godâs sovereignty over nature is not sharply distinguished from his sovereignty over human affairs, but the aim of this study is to point out that what happened to humankind in the garden did not spread to the rest of the world, the âirrational creatures.â
Another reason for steering clear of the interface between sovereignty and sinful human will is that, particularly amongst theistic evolutionists, there is a chronic confusion between âfree willâ and various concepts of âautonomyâ applied improperly to inanimate nature, a confusion that I do not propose to perpetuate here. For both of these reasons I will concentrate on the creation apart from humanity.
As is generally the case, the Old Testament is the best source from which to establish the basic foundations of biblical religion, on which the gospel is built. And a good place to start this study, for our purposes, is the list of blessings and curses associated with the Mosaic covenant.
It is now pretty well accepted in Old Testament scholarship that the Jewish âlawâ or torah, the first five books of our Bible (the Pentateuch), has a close affinity with ancient near eastern treaty documents, and particularly with those of the Hittites in the second millennium BCE. The pattern of Israelâs covenant with Yahweh follows that of the treaties that powerful kings would make with their vassals.
The book of Deuteronomy, which consists largely of Mosesâs discourse to Israel as they prepare to cross the Jordan, follows the pattern of such a treaty in its entirety. The pattern in the rest of the Pentateuch is broken up with law codes, narrative, and so on, but one can still discern part of the pattern of such a covenant document in the account of Moses on Mount Sinai in Exodus, and in Leviticus. The covenant is also restated in the book of Joshua.
Old Testament and ancient near east scholar John H. Walton gives the basic elements of an ancient near east treaty as follows:
Introduction of the speaker
Historical prologue
Stipulations
Divine witnesses
Curses and blessings
In the Exodus account of the making of the covenant, the first heading (introduction of the speaker) is limited to 20:2.
The historical prologue occurs in 19:3â6, in which God describes how he has brought Israel to himself, out of Egypt, and offers them the covenantâthat they will be his treasured possession if they are faithful to him.
The stipulations are primarily the Ten Commandments of 20:3â17. A typical ANE treaty would, at this point, have items such as the paying of tribute, providing military support, and showing general faithfulness to the king making the treaty. The Ten Commandments, however, being part of a treaty with God as King rather than with an earthly ruler, instead embody faithfulness to Yahweh in the âfirst table,â and faithfulness to brother-Israelites in the âsecond table.â
Their role as covenant stipulations explains their global scope and ethical basis. They are not âlawsâ as such, for they would be practically unenforceable. Instead they stipulate what kind of people the Israelites are to be, if they are to stay faithful to the gracious covenant God has made with them, having rescued them from Pharaohâs power. And, like the treaties made elsewhere in the ANE, Israelâs copy is kept for reference in the temple of their godâin this case, of course, the two tables of stone kept in the ark of the covenant in the tabernacle.
Coming to the matter in hand, the Ten Commandments are backed up by a series of blessings and curses, just as were ANE treaty stipulations. Walton says that even in these political treaties, it was the gods who were the agents who would bless compliance or, more often, punish violation. The biblical blessing...