![]()
PART I
ART, LITERATURE AND EDUCATION
![]()
1
CREATIVE LIFE
A speech delivered at the Academie des Beaux-Arts (Academy of Fine Arts) of the Institut de France, 14 June 1989.
As I reflect on the many individuals who have walked here at the Academy where I am walking now and stood where I am standing, I feel awe, respect, and an intense awareness of what the creative human being means. I have tried to express that feeling in a poem I wrote:
Deep, deep on the remote sea floor
lies a huge spring
whose pure waters pour forth unceasingly,
broader, bluer than any lake,
flowing on with a gentle and wondrous music.
This pure stream that has flowed
inexhaustibly since time began,
if we can touch it,
we can draw upon its eternal power of life;
if we can drink there,
it will nourish in us unfettered powers of creativity.
This spring that bursts forth
from the depths of the cosmos,
flowing into the wide sea of life,
this spring that is the mysterious source of the universe,
from its bottomless abyss
wells up the great sea of life,
and the melody of history resounds there.
That solemn and sacred music,
is it not the inner rhythm of humankind,
the language spoken by all men and women?
Can we not hear them,
the clear notes of this sacred symphony
that echo over the waves?
Can we not see it,
the pulsing rhythm that springs
from the depths of the spirit,
this profoundly deep, this unfathomable
fountain of creation?
Integrating Force
Art is the irrepressible expression of human spirituality. So it is now, and so it has always been. Into each one of the myriad concrete forms of art is impressed the symbol of ultimate reality. The creation of a work of art takes place within spatial boundaries, but through the process of creating, the soul of the artist seeks union with that ultimate reality, what might be called cosmic life. A living work of art is life itself, born from the dynamic fusion of the self (the microcosm) and the universe (the macrocosm).
Art is to the spirit what bread is to the body; through art we find oneness with a transcendental entity, breathe its rhythm, and absorb the energy we need for spiritual renewal. Art also functions to purify the inner being, to bring the spiritual uplift that Aristotle called catharsis. What is this quality in art that has ordained it to play such an elemental and enduring role in human life? I believe it is the power to integrate, to reveal the wholeness of things. In an early scene of Faust, Goethe (1749â1832) has Faust rapturously declare, âinto the whole how all things blend, each in the other working, livingâ.1 If we accept this marvellous statement of the interconnection of all living things, then art becomes the elemental modality through which humans discover their bonds with humans, humanity with nature, and humanity with the universe.
Whether it is poetry, painting or music, a jewel of artistic expression can stir within us an ineffable impulse that carries us soaring through the empyrean, letting us share the experience with others while confirming its reality. Artâs force of integration works in living beings by opening the way for the finite to become infinite, for the specificity of actual experience to assume universal meaning. Religion has always worked through art to affirm identity with the universal, as we can see in the intertwining of art and religious ritual in ancient drama. The English author Jane E. Harrison writes, âit is at the outset one and the same impulse that sends a man to church and to the theatreâ.2
According to an anecdote I once heard, a Japanese actor sensed that impulse when he made a trip to Europe many years ago. During a visit to the Louvre, after seeing a number of masterpieces of Western art, he was asked about his impressions. His immediate observation was, âEverything is so Christian!â Such a reaction, though overstated, conveys honest surprise at how pervasively the spirit of Western art has been nourished by Christian tradition. To observe how âChristianâ the art seemed was perhaps the way this visitor from Asia, thrust into the heartland of Western art, tried to express his encounter with the ultimate reality he sensed there. The cathedrals of Notre-Dame and Chartres, a summation in architecture of the worldview of medieval Christianity, embodied the awesome power of art to integrate the worldâs reality and ultimate reality. In the Middle Ages, art was religion, and religion was art, and in the fusion of the two, people carried out their passionate quest for a more fulfilling life.
Connecting Space
Compared with the rigorous monotheism of Christianity, Japanâs religious tradition is vague and undefined in many areas, but there is a strong aesthetic dimension in Japanese religiosity that forms a link with the universal. The French writer AndrĂ© Malraux, one of the great minds of the postwar world, understood that dimension. He saw the traditional Japanese aesthetic as different from the Western, calling it an âinner realityâ. That insight reflects his clear sense of the religious motivation behind the Japanese perception of unity, of common life, in nature and the universe. Somewhat earlier, another French intellectual, Paul Claudel, compared Western and Japanese aesthetics; he described the latter as concerned with becoming one with nature rather than dominating it. An inclination to reach out for wholeness, whether it is conscious or not, permeates all of Japanese culture.
For some time now, the force of integration that once infused art and religion in both Eastern and Western civilisations has been waning as modernisation overtakes us. Since the end of the nineteenth century, people sensitive enough to see this coming have been issuing warnings, and I do not wish to rehearse them here. But when human beings cut themselves off from nature and the universe, their bonds with each other also shrivel and die. The consequence is that people are isolated and alone; worse, their situation has become so ânormalâ that it is not even recognised as a problem.
The environment of art, also, has steadily been transformed as the modern era moves onward. Think of contemporary theatre compared with the classical age of Greek drama, when the audience, gathered in the amphitheatre around the stage, sometimes participated in plays more enthusiastically than the actors themselves. Today, when a solitary artist faces a blank piece of paper or white canvas, how can he or she connect with the unknown audience? No matter how talented the artist, the environment today offers no area of mutual encounter, no organic community of interest where the integrating force of art can work to connect us with ultimate reality.
Some people seek to rescue a dying, prehistoric vitality, trying to rediscover the stout hardiness of ancient people. Others dream of a rugged, indomitable nature unfettered by modernisation. The struggle to regain wholeness takes many forms. On the other hand, since late in the last century, it sometimes seems as though the very troubles of each era have brought forth a galaxy of stars marching past in an opulent parade of brilliant minds. While today there is greater possibility than ever before of freedom and artistic diversity, we find the ability to transcend the visible and penetrate ever deeper into reality weakening, and the yearning to heal disconnected spirits drying up.
Connected with Totality
The idea of integration is expressed in the Buddhist term kechi-en (literally to âjoinâ a âconnectionâ, it denotes a causal relationship or a function that joins life and its environment). The concept arises from the theory of âdependent originationâ, a philosophical construct important in Buddhism since the time of Shakyamuni. The theory of dependent origination holds that every phenomenon, be it social or natural, is the result of its connection with something else. Nothing can exist in total isolation; everything is interrelated. Usually we think of interactions in spatial terms, but the Buddhist conception is multidimensional, including the dimension of time. At the source of the Japanese aesthetic consciousness of empathy and coexistence with nature, which appealed to both Claudel and Malraux, is a primitive animism, but even more, an outlook rooted in the Buddhist concept of dependent origination.
Traditional art forms such as the tea ceremony, flower arranging, gardens, decorated sliding doors or folding screens are not created to have inherent value or meaning on their own. They derive their full meaning only when placed in a âspaceâ at the heart of ordinary, everyday life. Their value is dependent on kechi-en, the connection they establish with the space around them. Traditional forms of Japanese poetry, also, such as renga (linked verse) and haiku, could not have come into being without a space where many people could gather and literally bring out connections among the place, themselves, and their verses.
In Mahayana Buddhism the term kƫ (sometimes glossed as emptiness or void) describes the reality of all things as arising from kechi-en. There is still a tendency even today to associate the idea of kƫ with the notion of nothingness. Buddhism, particularly Hinayana Buddhism, is itself partially responsible. Hinayana thought encourages a kind of nihilism by teaching that enlightenment is sought through the negation of worldly value. Mahayana Buddhism places the concept of kƫ in a framework quite different from this static, nihilistic understanding. Mahayana Buddhists see reality as being in eternal flux; it is the flowing movement of life itself. The philosophy of Henri Bergson, in which reality is found in the continuity of phenomena rather than their eternal character, is actually closer to the Mahayana ideal than Hinayana Buddhism is.
I call the dynamism that ceaselessly pulsates through the Mahayana idea of kĆ« âcreative lifeâ. Creative life is devoted entirely to transcending the individual self by continually reaching beyond the limits of space and time in pursuit of the universal self. The creative life makes a new breakthrough, achieves self-renewal, every day, always attuned to the original rhythm of the universe, and by so doing it brings about a complete transformation. Ten years ago, a volume containing conversations I held with RenĂ© Huyghe of the AcadĂ©mie Française was published. There, Huyghe arrived at the heart of Mahayana Buddhism when he described its essence as âspiritual lifeâ, which he explained by saying that âwe are connected with the totality . . . [and] united with the creative action of the future, toward which the universe advancesâ.3
Sutra of this World
The Lotus Sutra, the core of Mahayana teaching, describes the dynamism of creative life in a number of ways to allow a comprehensive understanding of what it means. In one respect, creative life is free of the bounds of time and space, free to expand and grow. At the same time, creative life i...