![]()
1
âLONDONER OF BIRTH, SCOTTISH BY PARENTAGEâ
James Elmslie Duncan described himself, in a broadside of 1849, as a âLondoner of Birth, Scottish by Parentage, Divinarian in principleâ. The third element to his self-identity, I will explore in a later chapter. In this chapter I study the metropolitan and Scottish elements of his background. Very little, unfortunately, is known about his upbringing, but it was clearly an educated and lower-middle-class one â his father was described in the press as a âmost respectable and worthy manâ. James Elmslie Duncan was born 7 March 1822 and christened at Allhallows, London Wall on 2 June 1822. He was the second son of James Duncan and his wife Ann. He generally spelt his middle name âElmslieâ but in his third attempt at producing a periodical, in the late 1840s, he styled himself throughout as âElmzlieâ (under the influence of the phonetic reform movement). The Aberdeen Journal in 1850 described him as an Aberdonian, and David Goodway refers to him as the âMad Scotchmanâ in his history of London Chartism (as applied by observers of the young manâs behaviour, and perhaps an echo of the bearded convert to Judaism, Lord George Gordon of Gordon riots infamy), but there is no evidence from the numerous court appearances that he had a Scottish accent beyond the âScotchâ adopted in some of his verse.1 Perhaps he had a cockney accent, but again, we have no indication.
His father was born in Aberdeenshire in December 1790, the son of George Duncan and his wife Elizabeth, nĂ©e Elmslie â one of the youngest of many siblings. James Duncan became a merchant and an accountant living and working at 353 High Street, Wapping, during the period of his eldest surviving sonâs public career.
We do not know why he was drawn to London to make his living. John Fisher Murray, in his book The World of London, observed in 1843 that, despite the cityâs immensity, comparatively few Scotsmen established themselves in London, because, he argued, of âthe practical shrewdness and intuitive plain sense with which natives of that country are so bountifully endowed ⊠enables them to see that unless they have a connection established the capitalists of London are too heavy metal to contend with.â2 Murray argued that to the Scotsman, the Londoner was âmainly indebted ⊠for our daily breadâ â and among James Elmslie Duncanâs later, all-embracing list of reform causes in the late 1840s was âthe Abandonment of Death Work amongst Journeymen Bakersâ.3 Duncan senior was certainly involved at one point in the provision of grain, although he also retailed other commodities, such as cheese. He is earlier listed in a Post Office Directory as a Scotch provision agent, at 5 Lower East Smithfield (a narrow riverside street, beginning at Butcherâs Row, with wharfs such as the Aberdeen Steam wharf, and Hawley and Downeâs wharf, and situated on the west side of Hermitage Dock) â perhaps with a relation, Charles Duncan, in the same trade, at Millerâs Wharf, Lower East Smithfield.4
James Elmslie Duncan seems to have been raised in relatively comfortable circumstances, for his father could afford to subscribe to the worthy weekly Chambersâs Edinburgh Journal â the âfirst family magazine of the world,â as Duncan called it â from its inception (in 1832)5, had servants (or at least one servant, for one, Ann Gardener, sued for breach of promise when she became pregnant in 1846 by a Scottish ballast agent based in Wapping, and Duncan, described in the press as a Scotch provision merchant, agreed to corroborate her claim in court, but was then called away on business â or so it was reported6) and in the early 1850s was said to have an excellent stock in his general store or chandlerâs store. This was evidence proffered by a Poor Law relieving officer when the Poor Law Union was trying to make him pay more for his sonâs upkeep in an institution, so this may have been an exaggeration as James Duncan claimed his stock never exceeded ÂŁ30.
We can infer nothing about James Duncanâs politics from his livelihood, although commentators did detect a definite bias in the case of the French Ă©picier, or general provision merchant â he was the passive substratum, who âdo not meddle with political opinions, or beat time in any way to the march of the movementâ. Fiery youth, eager for change, confronted the Ă©picier, âwith his confirmed habit of orderâ. The Westminster Review, from which these comments come, discussed the âPhysiology of the Epicierâ, in 1836.7 A fascinating essay on the Parisian types, which appeared in the Scottish journal Hoggâs Weekly Instructor, in 1845, also suggested the grocer, or Ă©picier, was the âupholder of conservatismâ, but though like one âhalf-educatedâ â who but the Ă©picier read successive editions of Voltaire and Rousseau? Yet who but the Ă©picier read the novelist Charles Paul de Kock, wept at melodrama, or mixed sentiment with maintenance of social order and stability?8 Of the British grocer, the discussion in the series of character sketches illustrated by Kenny Meadows entitled âHeads of the Peopleâ, suggested a similar apoliticism in a time of thriving trade, although, interestingly, in relation to James Elmslie Duncan, there was the recognition that the sons of grocers could, at least until they settled down, be given to sentimentality and theatricality, âhis eldest hope has a jaunty active look ... you perceive that his hair is parted in the middle and suffered to curl a little over his shirt collar. You once detected him putting a clove into a letter which he quickly sealed apologizing for the delay he informs you that he likes his letters to smell sweet even though it is only a bill.â9 Were James Elmslie Duncanâs poetic sensibilities ever similarly expressed, at his fatherâs shop counter? He certainly had the hairstyle.
James Duncan married Ann Middleton, born in March 1798, and also from Aberdeen. Their ten children included George Middleton, born in 1818 at Broadford Street in Aberdeen, the only child of their marriage who seems to have been born in Scotland, who died in 1819; Jane Gordon, born in London in March 1820, who died in 1822; John, born in August 1824 (and received at Allhallows after having been privately baptised previously); Jessie Ann, born in September 1826, who died in 1828; George, born in July 1828; Gordon, born in September 1830; Charles, born in September 1833; William, born in July 1836; and Alexander Boyd, born in August 1838.10 The Duncans evidently made the decision to leave the expanding town of Aberdeen and move down south shortly after the death of George. All the later children were christened amid the classical elegance of the church of Allhallows, London Wall.
In the baptismal registers the abode was given as 26 St Mary Axe, which was the address for âDuncan, brokersâ, in a London street directory in 1823.11 The brokerage is unspecified in the directory but a partnership as provision factor with âC. Duncanâ was dissolved in October 1822; and James Duncan was a cheesemonger when declared bankrupt in November 1836, appearing at Basinghall Street Bankruptcy Court in December 1836.12 By 1838, the year in which the Chartist movement emerged, the family had moved from this City address, a place of marine insurance and shipbrokers â now a financial centre notable for the skyscraper at No.30 known as the âGherkinâ â to 5 Lower East Smithfield, James Duncanâs occupation being listed as merchant or provision merchant.13 At the same address was J. Shoobert, cooper and shipsâ chandler, in the vicinity were opticians, a chart seller, a sailmaker and shipsâ smiths. Presumably Duncan had settled with his creditors. There is no discussion of bankruptcy in James Elmslie Duncanâs work â but it may well have cast a dark cloud over his childhood, the âmost spectacular form of economic failure in Victorian society,â as Barbara Weiss describes it, âsudden, catastrophic, and final.â14 Although stigmatised, it was not an uncommon experience at the time, and Duncanâs change of trade was perhaps not unusual.
Five of the Duncan children survived into adulthood, including one of the sons who had saved enough money to emigrate to Australia some time in the early 1850s15, and three of the siblings who lived with their mother in Scotland, being maintained by the father (whether this was merely a temporary arrangement, we do not know). He was able to support, in that period, the Scottish Society (according to testimony given in a police court; presumably this was the Scottish Hospital for the relief of Scottish poor in London, or Caledonian Asylum16). An essay on the Scots in London noted that they herded together, having their annual Caledonian balls, their Presbyterian clergy, and the âannual dinner of the Caledonian Asylumâ.17
We know nothing about the fatherâs relationship with his son before adulthood: one of James Elmslie Duncanâs earliest poetic effusions, about sea bathing, recalls his father rescuing someone from the sea who had been seized with cramp, but otherwise, James Elmslie Duncan revealed nothing in his poetry. Even verse about the death of an infant sister is unrevealing, or rather its superficiality is enlightening. As one reviewer suggested of the Chartist poet Gerald Massey, perhaps he wrote because he âhas read poetry, not because he has felt itâ.18
In James Elmslie Duncanâs incomplete novel Edward Noble the Utopian, the hero reflects, âstrong, very strong is the influence of early training, early associations, of the recollections of a motherâs words, of a fatherâs adviceâ.19 His mother does not figure in his surviving prose or poetry, except, possibly, in the reference to snow in a paragraph in Morning Star, âIt is in Scotland no uncommon thing for people to be lost in the snow. We were ourselves once consigned to this grave by no means to the comfort of our dear mother.â20 He was, according to his own fatherâs testimony, âwell educated, understood several languagesâ â the police court magistrate Edward Yardley described his fatherâs âfull dutyâ towards his wayward son, in 1853, having given him a âvery superior educationâ, by which was meant, perhaps, an education that went beyond the mere reading, writing and arithmetic which might be deemed useful for the sort of trade Duncan senior was engaged in.21
How formal or intermittent this education was, and indeed where it took place (perhaps in private or endowed Lower East Smithfield establishments), we do not know, but it was presumably supplemented by self-study. âI have been no little book-worm,â he told his readers in 1845.22 His published prose was, if not replete with foreign languages, occasionally adorned with italicised words such as mens populi and Ă©meute, but he did not have the habit, useful for the biographer, of larding his prose with quotations from other authors, so one has no evidence of the width or depth of his reading except the absence of quotation. Shakespeare, Milton, Goldsmith, Sterne, Burns, Shelley, and Victor Hugo feature in his published work.
James Elmslie Duncan saw himself as a member of the middle class, his education giving him access to the progressive and middle-class journalism of the age â The Times (which was praised by him, in late 1849, at least for its opposition to the New Poor Law and to protectionism), Punch, Chambersâs Edinburgh Journal (âtoo much of Malthus, too little of Bentham â too much of Paley, and too little of Paineâ23) and Eliza Cookâs Journal (which, not surprisingly, since its editor was a popular poet, thought highly of the role of poetry: âno âdream,â but a reality of unmeasured influence and power, for good or for ill; so much so that one law-giver (Charondas) wrote his laws in verse, and another banished Homer from his ideal Republicâ).24
We are on more certain, if insalubrious, ground in relation to James Elmslie Duncanâs environment in his adulthood in the 1840s. Wapping was the site of the ambitious Thames Tunnel connecting the Thames Dock to the Surrey side of London at Rotherhithe (and finally completed in 1843, for foot passengers originally). Duncanâs home environment was full of maritime bustle; Wapping was the archetypal nautical district, lending its name to other districts in England, in Tasmania, and elsewhere.25 Destroyed by later Victorian commercial growth, the Blitz, and post-war development, t...