A
âAbbĂĄs NĂșrĂ, MĂrzĂĄ Buzurg (d. 1839)
The father of BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh. âAbbĂĄs came from an eminent family in the Iranian province of MĂĄzandarĂĄn which traced its ancestry back to the last pre-Islamic Sassanian king of Iran, Yazdigird III. The familyâs ancestral lands were around the village of TĂĄkur in the district of NĂșr. âAbbĂĄs served as minister (vaztr) to one of the sons of Fatáž„-âAlĂ ShĂĄh (reg. 1797â1834) and later as a provincial governor for BurĂșjird and LunstĂĄn. The enmity of the new chief minister, កåjĂ MĂrzĂĄ ĂQĂSĂ (âAbbĂĄs had been a friend of ĂqĂĄsĂâs rival and predecessor), led to the loss of his political power in 1835 and to severe financial problems. BKG 11â12. (See also NĂRĂ FAMILY.)
âAbbĂĄs NĂșrĂ (MĂrzĂĄ Buzurg), father of BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh
âAbbĂșd, llyĂĄs (d. 1878)
Christian merchant of Akka. Owner of the larger (seaward facing) part of what is now termed the house of âAbbĂșd occupied by BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh. (See also AKKA.)
âAbduh, Shaykh Muáž„ammad (d. 1905)
Leading Muslim reformer whose ideas were influential throughout much of the Islamic world. Grand mufti of Egypt, 1889â1905. He met âAbduâl-BahĂĄ in Beirut in 1878 and became his fervent admirer. AB 38; EGBBF 5; GPB 193
Abdulaziz (1830â76)
âAbduâl-âAZĂZ, OTTOMAN sultan, 1861â76, who advanced the Tanzimat reforms, but opposed liberalism; the first sultan to visit Western Europe. He was deposed in 1876 (30 May), and shortly after either committed suicide or was murdered. It was during his reign that the successive exiles of BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh within the Ottoman empire took place. After receiving the order of banishment to Edirne, BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh sent him a strongly worded tablet in which the sultanâs ministers were censured (see ĂLI PAáčąA; FUAT PAáčąA). He later addressed the sultan in the SĂșra of the KINGS, calling upon him not to entrust the affairs of state into the hands of corrupt and godless ministers, but himself to rule with justice and fear God. He was Godâs âshadow on earthâ (a traditional royal title), and as such should be detached from the world and ensure the well-being of his subjects. BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh also deplored the extremes of wealth and poverty he witnessed in ISTANBUL, and protested his own innocence of any wrongdoing that would have merited his banishment. The sultanâs downfall was prophesied in BahĂĄâuâllĂĄhâs tablet to Fuat PaĆa. GPB 158â60, 172â3, 195â6; PDC 11, 37â40, 61â3, 66, 71; RB2: 312â15.
âAbduâl-BahĂĄ (Ar., âServant of BahĂĄâ) (1844â1921)
Title of BahĂĄâuâllĂĄhâs eldest son and successor.
âAbduâl BahĂĄ as a young man in Edirne
TITLES AND APPOINTMENT
His given name was âAbbĂĄs, but his father also referred to him as the âMasterâ (ĂqĂĄ) and the âMost Great (or Mighty) Branchâ (ghuáčŁn-i-aâáșam), the âMystery of Godâ (sirruâllĂĄh), the âLimb of the Law of Godâ who âencompassed the whole of creationâ, and the apple of his eye. During the period of his leadership (1892â1921), he preferred to be known as âAbduâl-BahĂĄ, and it is by this title that he is now generally known. BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh explicitly named him as his successor in his will, the Book of the COVENANT, but prior to this had implicitly directed that after his own death, his followers should turn to âAbduâl-BahĂĄ as their leader and as the interpreter of his writings (KA 63 k121, 82 k174). In the Tablet of the BRANCH, a letter to an individual BahĂĄâĂ, composed in the 1860s when âAbduâl-BahĂĄ was only in his twenties, BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh had also stated that those who had turned towards âAbduâl-BahĂĄ had turned towards God, and that those who rejected him had repudiated BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh and transgressed against him (WOB 135).
EARLY LIFE
According to tradition âAbduâl-BahĂĄ was born on the very night of the BĂBâS declaration (23 May 1844). His mother was BahĂĄâuâllĂĄhâs first wife, NAVVĂB. As a boy he experienced the shocks of his fatherâs arrest in 1852, the subsequent exile to Iraq (he himself suffered from frost-bite during the journey in the bitter cold), and BahĂĄâuâllĂĄhâs withdrawal to the mountains of Kurdistan (1854â6). Greatly attached to his father, he began to assist him whilst still in his teens, increasingly taking responsibility for the practical affairs of the family and acting as one of his fatherâs secretaries. By the time of the move to Akka (1868) he had become effectively responsible for the whole exile community (BahĂĄâuâllĂĄhâs family and disciples) and its relations with Ottoman officialdom. Although never attending any school he evidently read widely and became well known and respected amongst Ottoman officials and reformers, including several of the provincial governors in their various places of exile and figures such as Midhat Pasha and the Egyptian Shaykh Muáž„ammad âABDUH. After his father moved out of Akka (1877) he continued to live in the city, increasingly gaining acceptance as a local notable despite continuing to live under the governmentâs order of banishment. Giving alms to the poor and regularly attending the local mosque, he came to be seen by the local population as a pious, albeit heterodox Muslim leader rather than as the son of the founder of a new religion. In 1873, he married MUNĂRIH NahrĂ (1847â1938), a girl from a prominent IáčŁfĂĄhĂĄnĂ BahĂĄâĂ merchant family. The couple had four daughters who survived to adulthood, in addition to two sons and three daughters who died in childhood (see NĂRĂ FAMILY). Unlike his father, grandfather and uncles, all of whom followed the contemporary upper-class Muslim practice of having several wives, âAbduâl-BahĂĄ remained monogamous.
MINISTRY (1892â1921)
âAbduâl-BahĂĄâs ministry can be divided into three phases:
(1) 1892â1908
The first phase was one of persistent difficulty and danger. Although most of the BahĂĄâĂs readily accepted BahĂĄâuâllĂĄhâs clear appointment of âAbduâl-BahĂĄ, and gave him their devotion, members of BahĂĄâuâllĂĄhâs extended family, led by âAbduâl-BahĂĄâs half-brother, MUកAMMAD-âALĂ, rejected his authority, and began an at first covert and then open campaign to discredit him (see COVENANT-BREAKERS). Of the family, only his sister (BAHIYYIH KHĂNUM), wife and daughters, together with a surviving uncle and his family, remained loyal. Unable to shake the allegiance of the mass of the BahĂĄâĂs, this campaign led to recurrent problems for âAbduâl-BahĂĄ with the Turkish authorities, including the reimposition of confinement in Akka (1901) and the appointment of two official commissions of enquiry, the second of which (1907â8) was expected to cause his exile to North Africa. This prolonged opposition caused âAbduâl-BahĂĄ to give great emphasis to the doctrine that there was a sacred COVENANT which ensured the preservation of BahĂĄâĂ unity through obedience to the properly appointed leaders of the Faith. Those who broke this covenant, such as Muáž„ammad-âAlĂ and his associates, were denounced as âCovenant-breakersâ and were ultimately excommunicated.
During this period âAbduâl-BahĂĄ sought to ensure that the Faith would remain co-ordinated and protected from his opponents even if something were to happen to him, writing his WILL AND TESTAMENT, in which he appointed his eldest grandson, SHOGHI EFFENDI â then still a child â to be the Guardian of the Faith after him; outlining the system to be employed for the election of the UNIVERSAL HOUSE OF JUSTICE referred to by BahĂĄâuâllĂĄh; and excluding Muáž„ammad-âAlĂ from succession on account of his Covenant-breaking. He also began to encourage the formation of locally elected BahĂĄâĂ councils (ASSEMBLIES) in various parts of the BahĂĄâĂ world, as well as of several ânationalâ bodies.
Other developments of this period were the composition of âAbduâl-BahĂĄâs Treatise on POLITICS (1892â3), written as a guide for the Iranian BahĂĄâĂs at a time of growing political instability; the emergence of BahĂĄâĂ groups in North America and Europe, and the first pilgrimage visit from Western BahĂĄâĂs to Akka (1898â9); âAbduâl-BahĂĄâs encouragement of educational, medical and economic development among the Eastern BahĂĄâĂs; the beginning of the construction of the first BahĂĄâĂ house of worship in the city of ASHKHABAD in Russian Turkestan; and the construction of the SHRINE OF THE BĂB on Mount Carmel.
(2) 1908â14
In 1908 the Young Turk revolution led to the freeing of Ottoman political prisoners, and the dangers that had faced âAbduâl-BahĂĄ in Akka came to an end. In 1910 he moved across the bay from Akka to the newly developing city of HAIFA, which thenceforth was to remain the headquarters of the Faith. The BĂĄbâs remains were interred in the completed Shrine there on 21 March 1909, giving Haifa additional spiritual importance for BahĂĄâĂs.
Taking advantage of his new freedom of movement âAbduâl-BahĂĄ, now in his late sixties and far from well, moved to Egypt in 1910, and then embarked on a three-month journey to visit the new BahĂĄâĂs of England and France (September-December 1911) (see p. 17). Resting for the winter in Egypt, he made a longer second journey to visit the Western BahĂĄâĂs (March 1912âJune 1913). After fourteen months of extensive travelling in the United States and Canada, during which he visited thirty-eight cities, he returned to Europe, where he visited Britain, France, Germany, and Austria-Hungary. He returned to Egypt (June 1913) and to Haifa (December) in a state of exhaustion.
âAbduâl BahĂĄ in Paris
The journeys were of major importance: (1) they contributed to the consolidation of the fledgling Western BahĂĄâĂ communities, giving the BahĂĄâĂs a wider vision of their faith and encouraging them to greater action; (2) they attracted considerable public attention â including extensive sympathetic newspaper coverage â so that many people heard of the BahĂĄâĂ teachings for the first time; (3) âAbduâl-BahĂĄ met many eminent people (including churchmen such as Archdeacon Wilberforce and T.K. Cheyne in England; academics such as the comparat...