Chapter 1
Maximum Security
Fact: One in four maximum-security inmates is a psychopath.
Day 1
The snap of the lock releasing shattered the still morning air as the large metal gate, adorned with rows of razor wire, crept open along an iron rail. The ālock shotā, as it was known, echoed off nearby buildings, amplifying the eeriness of an already macabre scene. Two twenty-foot-high parallel chain-link fences stretched a quarter mile in either direction of the gate. In the space between the fences was an eight-foot-high column of razor wire, a gauntlet not even the most agile convict could vault. There was not a soul in sight. The gate appeared to mysteriously recognize someone was approaching and opened to welcome me to my first day working in a maximum-security prison.
That morning I had driven sixty miles through the rain from my residence in Vancouver to the town of Abbotsford, the home of several high-security prisons in the lower mainland of British Columbia, Canada. The Matsqui complex is just minutes off the freeway, surrounded by a collection of petrol stations and delis, no doubt to feed the hundreds of vehicles and staff who commute to the location each day. The entrance to the compound is nondescript except for the sign indicating that all visitors and vehicles on the property are subject to search and seizure for contraband. The vista stretches as far as the eye can see, rolling hills of dark green grass dotted with castlelike structures surrounded by moats of high fences topped with razor wire and fifty-foot-high turrets placed strategically at each bend in the fence. At the end of a long road is the Regional Health Centre (RHC) ā a name that belies its guests. RHC is a maximum-security treatment facility for sex offenders and violent offenders. Its 250 beds contain some of the most dangerous criminals in Canada. It was my new place of work.
I was a twenty-three-year-old first-year graduate student. On the early morning drive, I thought about how wholly unprepared I was for my first day of interviewing prisoners in the violent offender facility. For the past several years, I had divided my time between studying the research literature on psychopaths, undergoing training in brain-imaging techniques, and engaging in a loosely related line of research on a study of the brain electrical activity associated with auditory processes of killer whales, comparable in many ways to those of humans. Becoming ever more fascinated by psychopathy research, I had also been vigorously pursuing mentorship with my academic hero, the founding father of modern research in psychopathy, Professor Robert D. Hare, who only recently had accepted me as a graduate student. Yet now, as I walked past the metal detectors at the entrance to the compound, surrounded by razor wire, I paused and wondered what the hell I was thinking. I would be working, all alone, on the forbidding task of conducting in-depth interviews with the prisonās most violent inmates, many of whom had been assessed as psychopaths. After the interviews, I planned to administer EEG (electroencephalogram) tests, measuring electric impulses in the brain in response to emotionally loaded words ā data that would help us understand the connections between psychopathic brain processes and behaviour.
I cleared security, received my ID card, and was given directions to the department of psychiatry by a guard, pale and gaunt, who looked like he had spent fifty years behind bars. The next lock snapped open with a now familiar audible crack and the heavy lead-lined door popped open; I gently pushed it forward. As I took my first few steps into this new environment, I smiled to myself that my first concern, a cavity search, had not come to pass as I went through security. I made a mental note to get even with the senior graduate student who had told me that cavity searches of new staff were common in Canadian prisons.
Inmates dressed in white T-shirts, jeans, and dark green jackets milled around the laundry, barbershop, and chapel as I walked from the administration entrance to psychiatry. The halls smelled like disinfectant, and I pondered what chemicals were used to clean up blood.
I entered the large, ominous building at the end of the walkway. I wandered down the corridor like a lost child until I came upon a sign on an office door that said DR BRINK. Sitting there, oddly facing away from the open door, almost inviting me to sneak up and scare him, was Chief Forensic Psychiatrist Dr Johann Brink. Iād met Dr Brink just three months earlier at a NATO-funded Advanced Study Institute on psychopathy in Alvor, Portugal. Over numerous dinners and bottles of wine, I had convinced Dr Brink to collaborate with me on my EEG studies of psychopaths. He helped me get my protocols approved by the prisons and the university ethics boards. With all this paperwork in hand, I tapped lightly on the door frame to his office. He spun around, only partially startled, and greeted me with a huge smile.
āKent, great to see you! Welcome to maximum security!ā he bellowed in his distinctive South African accent.
Johann proceeded to walk me down the corridor and show me my office, empty except for a phone and a desk with two chairs on opposing sides. A large, bright red button was positioned chest high, right in the middle of the wall.
āI recommend you take the chair closest to the door; just in case you piss one of them off, you can run out quickly. Better than getting caught on the other side of the desk. If you canāt get out, hit that red button and the guards should come running.ā He spoke so casually I could not help but wonder if he was kidding.
āAnd here is your key ā donāt lose it!ā I was handed a six-inch brass key with large, odd-shaped, forbidding teeth. The key, made by only two companies in the world, was specific to prisons. It opened most doors.
He pointed down the corridor to a large door. āThe guysā cells are through there. Iāve got to run now; we can check in at the end of the day, eh?ā Johann smiled and turned away as he was finishing his sentence. As I inserted my new key into the shoulder-height lock in the door, I faintly heard him say what I thought was āEnjoy!ā as he closed his office door tightly ā no doubt to keep the next visitor from sneaking up on him.
I pushed open the hallway door to the prisonersā cells, turned and closed it, inserted my key on the other side, and spun the heavy-duty lock 180 degrees. I tugged on the door to make sure it was locked, took a deep breath, and proceeded down the 100-foot-long hallway to the inmate housing units.
I arrived at a ābubbleā ā a round security room, with one-way, tinted windows, no doors apparent. I gazed down the four corridors that radiated from it like spokes, as maximum-security inmates milled about, staring coldly. I wasnāt afraid, but rather nervous about whether anyone would agree to talk with me. By way of training, Professor Hare had handed me a worn copy of the introductory book on life in prison titled Games Criminals Play the previous day and said, āRead this first, and good luck tomorrow!ā It was trial by fire, sink or swim. I should have read the book last night, I thought.
A small office with glass windows and a half door was across the hall; a forensic nurse was handing out shaving razors to a queue of inmates. She looked at me curiously and waved me over.
āCan I help you?ā she asked cautiously.
āIām the new research guy from UBC. Iām here to sign inmates up for interviews and EEG studies.ā UBC stands for University of British Columbia, where I was a doctoral student studying psychology and brain science. EEG stands for electroencephalography (also electroencephalogram), or the recording of brain electrical activity using noninvasive sensors attached to the head, amplified, and recorded on a computer for subsequent digital analyses.
āCome in and sit down then; letās talk about it.ā
I leaned over the half door and looked for a latch.
āOn your left,ā she said. I found the latch and flicked it open and sat down in the closest chair. She finished handing out shaving razors to the last of the inmates and turned to look at me.
āThe inmates get razors?ā I inquired with a puzzled tone.
āYes,ā she said, laughing, āand they often disappear; I donāt ask where they go.ā
I realized that Dr Brink was wise to tell me to sit closest to the door during my interviews.
Dorothy Smith was a twenty-year veteran of the maximum-security prison. Despite her long stay in prison, Dorothy was no worse for wear. Her slim athletic build was topped with an infectious personality that won over even the most hardened inmates. She would become one of my closest friends during my seven-year term in Canadian prisons. And she shared my interest in figuring out what made psychopaths tick.
āIāll set you up with a nice one for your first interview,ā Dorothy said as she glanced up to the housing chart taped to the cabinet. I followed her gaze and noticed headshots of inmates on the cabinets behind me, their names listed underneath: last name, first name, and index crime. Attempted murder, rape/murder, arson/murder, murder 3x, murder/rape. I pondered if ārape/murderā and āmurder/rapeā were the same thing and was about to ask Dorothy when I thought better of it. I didnāt want to know; I had enough on my plate for my first day.
The inmate she selected, āGordonā,* seemed courteous enough as he sat down in the chair on the far side of my office. He was forty-two years old, balding, grey haired, and soft spoken; the crime listed under his headshot was āattempted murderā.
A fascinating guy, Gordon turned out to be a serial bank robber. He told me his crimes had financed a lavish lifestyle, including first-class international plane tickets, front-row seats at hockey games, and girlfriends and prostitutes in many different cities. After his most recent arrest, Gordon had to explain to the police why he had more than $75,000 in cash, despite being technically unemployed. With his lawyer, he negotiated immunity throughout Canada on the condition that he help police clear up a number of unsolved bank robberies. The number of robberies that Gordon was directly involved in reached close to fifty, but he was never charged in any of them. Gordon regaled me with story upon story of successful bank robberies. He told me how to case a town or city, then the banks, how to get in and out in less than sixty seconds, how to steal a getaway car, and how to launder the money. I asked him how a bank could keep him from robbing it? He gave me hours of insights. I started making notes about how to design a better bank ā Perhaps, I thought, I can consult with bank executives if my academic career doesnāt work out.
My interview with Gordon was designed to cover all domains of his life. We reviewed his upbringing, education, family, friends, sporting activities, work experience, career goals, finances, health, intimate and romantic relationships, substance abuse and impulsive behaviours, emotions, antisocial behaviours, and his index offence. The interview typically takes anywhere from one to three hours. With Gordon I spent six hours. We pored over all the details of his life. If if I hadnāt been hooked on this career path yet, I was after speaking with Gordon.
Our review of his work experience was brief. Gordon had had dozens of jobs, but he never held one for more than a month. He was routinely fired because rather than working, he preferred to play jokes, take long lunches, drink, and gamble. Most of his jobs were in construction or as a car mechanic (he admitted to choosing this vocation so he could become a better car thief). When asked about his future plans, Gordon said he wanted to leverage some of his residual bank robbery proceeds to start a motorcycle dealership. He failed to appreciate the potential legal (and tax) implications of such an endeavour.
During our discussion of his finances, Gordon admitted he rarely used bank accounts.
āAfraid of someone stealing it?ā I quipped.
āNo,ā he replied with a wry smile, āI just donāt like to have to explain to people where I got the cash.ā
āIf you donāt keep your money in a bank, where do you keep it?ā
āI bury it,ā he said with a laugh, āall over the place; you canāt just drive around with hundreds of thousands of dollars on you after a job. Or I FedEx it to a five-star hotel in Asia, Europe, or South America where I have a reservation under a false name; once in a while I will FedEx it to a girlfriend in another town, tell her itās a present but not to open it until I get there, stuff like that. You always have to be careful when you get to the hotel to make sure the cops are not on to you. I usually wear a disguise and scope out the place. I like to send the package two-day overnight and fly there first, then watch the delivery to make sure there are no cops. Iāve only lost a few packages.ā He paused, then laughed again as he told me about a prostitute he had sent $50,000 in cash to a few years back. She never picked him up from the airport and he never saw her again. āI knew better than to trust that girl.ā
āMoney belts used to work through airports too, but itās harder to do that now, more risky,ā he mused. He continued. āMules sometimes, but really, I just like to go for a hike and bury it. Then I know itās always going to be there when I need it. I have lots of good places to bury it, but I donāt talk about that stuff with anyone.ā
We turned to talking about his views on relationships, family, and friends. Gordon was a loner; heād never felt the need to be close to anyone. Heād had hundreds of sexual liaisons, starting at the age of eleven. When asked if he had ever been in love with someone, he replied quickly and with a large smile about the time he was with three prostitutes at the same time ā for a week.
āAh, I loved them all,ā he said as he took a deep breath, remembering.
Gordon equated love with good sex. Heād been married six times, all in different countries, all under aliases. When asked why he got married, he replied: āMakes the girls happy, keeps the sex coming for a while, and they are more willing to help mule or receive stolen money.ā Gordon admitted the prostitute he sent the $50,000 to and never heard from again was wife number three.
He had n...