1
Bloody Suitors!
He got up at around nine oâclock with the usual feeling of dread. He threw off the duvet. Still unused to being vertical, he pounded the pillow and the sheet to ensure heâd dislodged strands of hair as well as the micro-organisms that subsisted on such surfaces but were invisible to the naked eye. He straightened the duvet, tugging at it till it was symmetrical on each side. He smoothed the sheet, patting it but skimming the starchy bitâa shiny patch of dried semen, already quite oldâon the right flank of where heâd lain.
The anger inside him hadnât goneâfrom the aftermath of the concert. Heâd watched it six days ago on TV: Africa, London, and Philadelphia conjoined by satellite. He switched it off after three quarters of an hour. By the time the Boomtown Rats came on, and the sea of dancing people in Wembley Stadium was being intercut with Ethiopian children with innocent eyes and bulbous heads, a phrase had arisen in his consciousness: âDance of deathâ. Didnât the exulting crowds in Wembley and in Philadelphia see their heroesâ and their own complicity in the famine? But surely this line of thought was absurd, maybe malicious, and to interpret in such terms an event of messianic goodwill, meant to bring joy and food to Ethiopia, nothing but perverse? So what if it brings a bit of joy to Londoners as well? Is that what youâre resenting? Heâd discussed it with Mark while having lunch in the Students Union Building; and Mark, in the incredibly tolerant way of one whoâs brushed aside death (he was a cancer survivor; his lower left leg was amputated), and who saw his friendâs madness for what it was, said with self-deprecating reasonableness: âI think any kind of effort that brings relief to Africa is all right.â âCan one make an aesthetic objection, though, however awful that might sound?â Ananda had insisted. âCan an aesthetic objection go beyond what might seem morally right? That all those people cheering and dancing in Wembley Stadium, all of them thinking that by dancing to the music they were doing those starving children a good turnâthat it made it quite wrong and macabre somehow, especially when you saw the faces of the children?â Mark smiled a smile of understandingâand of one who knew deathâs proximity. As for Ananda: his own position on this matter underlined to him his isolation from the worldâfrom London, for that matter.
*
That feeling had come to him at other times, when heâd seen the necessity for certain actions and yet couldnât participate in themâincluding the great march that took place a couple of years ago soon after heâd arrived here as a student. He remembered his first awkward hour in the collegeâjoining the other first years for the freshersâ get-together in the Common Room on the second floor of Foster Court, ascending the stairs under a painting by Whistler, and ending up informing a bespectacled girl with a Princess Di haircut that the Sanskrit prem meant both carnal desire and love, that there was no separation between the two in âIndian cultureâ. The girl had smiled distantly. Only a week or two after his arrival, the news of the imminent cruise missiles had gathered force, leading finally to the march. He didnât want to die and he didnât want the world to blow up (as it seemed it any day would), but he couldnât spend too much time thinking of the shadow of death hanging over mankind. Yet he didnât quite admit this to himself. It was his uncle, whoâd come to see him the next day in Warren Street, whoâd said, while watching the Hyde Park-bound procession on TV with Monsignor Kent in the foreground (a touch of revolutionary glamour it gave to this man, the word âMonsignorâ):
âTheyâre not getting to the root cause. Theyâre concerned about the symptom.â
This was uttered in the droopy-eyed, amused way in which he spoke aphorisms containing a blindingly obvious truth ignored by everybody.
âSymptom?â said Ananda, challenging his uncle, but part of him chiming in.
âThe nuclear bombâs only a symptom,â repeated his uncle, almost contemptuous. âGetting rid of it wonât solve anything. Arrey baba, they have to look at the root cause.â
*
He pottered about for three or four minutes, making wasted journeys in the room, before parting the curtains and lifting the window a crack. In crumpled white kurta and pyjamas, he looked out on the street and on Tandoor Mahal opposite, unconcerned about being noticed by passers-by below. It was striking how, with the window even marginally openâheavy wooden windows he had to heave up or claw down, and which he was unused to (they made him fear for his fingers)âsounds swam into the studio flat, making him feel paradoxically at home. His mind was elsewhere. He was aware that the house itself was very quiet. The only time there was a sound was when he walked about, and a floorboard groaned at the footfall.
Upstairs, theyâd sleep till midday or later. He knew when they were awake because of the sporadic bangs and thuds that announced movement. It was as if the person who first woke up didnât just get on their feet, but stamped on the floor. The noise they made wasnât intentionalâit was incidental. It wasnât directed against others because it bore no awareness of others. It was pure physical expression, made by those whose heads didnât carry too many thoughtsâat least, not when they woke and became mobile again.
* * *
He hadnât slept well. This was the norm; partly, it was the recurrent hyperacidity, which had him prop up two pillows against the wallâthat made it difficult to sleep tooâand, cursing, reach in the dark for the slim packs of Double Action Rennie he kept at his bedside. The taste of the tabletsâwith associations of chalk powder and spearmintâstayed with him slightly longer than their palliative effects.
But mainly it was the neighbours. They hardly slept till 3 or 4 a.m. There were three people upstairs, but also, often, a fourth. Vivek Patel, who wore pleated trousers and was lavish with aftershave; he wore accessories tooâchains around the wrist, fancy belts etcetera. He had a lispâor not a lisp, really, but a soft way of saying his tâs that was both limpid and menacing. His girlfriend Cynthia stayed in the same room. She was Bengali, but from a family of Christian converts. Cynthia Roy. She was pretty and a little cheap-looking, with her bright red lipstick and simper and the thick outline of kohl, and with her sheep-like devotion to Vivek. Cynthia was a new kind of womanâa social aspirant, like her boyfriendâthat Ananda couldnât really fathom, especially the mix of characteristics: newfangled but unintellectual, independent but content to be Vivekâs follower. Anyway, Ananda barely existed for her. Someone had said she liked âtough menâ. Vivek wasnât taller than five feet seven or eight, but he was probably toughâbecause he was broad. In spite of his chains and aftershave, he had a swift, abstracted hammerhead air. Ananda had overheard him say âFuck off, fuck offâ to Walia, the landlord, after the payphone incidentâuttering the admonishment in his calm musical manner (âFukko, fukkoâ) to which Walia clearly had no answer. Walia had nevertheless reclaimed the payphone coin box and carried it downstairs and out of 16 Warren Street. But in all other ways he was toothless before Vivek Patel because Vivekâs father, an East African businessman, was an old contact of Waliaâs. Patel Senior lived in Tanzania. From there, heâd sent forth two sons, Vivek and Shashank (who stayed in the single room next to his older brother), to study at the American Management School in London. Shashank looked like Vivek in a narrow mirror: he was slightly taller, paler, and a bit nicer. He spoke with the same lispâwhich could have been a hallmark of Tanzanian Gujaratis. On his lips, it sounded guileless and reassuring. Heâd told Ananda in the solemn way of one gripped and won over by a fiction that the American Management School offered genuine American degrees. This was the first time theyâd discussed education and pretended to be high-minded students of a similar kindâto have different aims that somehow nobly overlapped and converged in this location, despite the signals to the contrary. No wonder they donât have to study. Besides, who comes to London to do management?
* * *
The dull pulse-like beat started at eleven oâclock at night. It was a new kind of music called ârapâ. It baffled Ananda even more than disco. He had puzzled and puzzled over why people would want to listen and even move their bodies to an angry, insistent onrush of wordsâwords that rhymed, apparently, but had no echo or afterlife. It was as if they were an extension of the body: never had words sounded so alarmingly physical, and pure physicality lacks empathy, itâs machine-like. So it seemed from his prejudiced overhearings. But down here he couldnât hear the wordsâonly the beat and the bass note. It wasnât loud, but it was profound, and had a way of sinking through the ceiling into his body below. Each time it started, his TV was still on, and heâd allow himself to think, âItâs OK, itâs not so bad really, I donât know why I let it bother me. I can ignore it.â This gave him great reassurance for a few minutes. But the very faintness of the pulse, and the way it caused the remotest of tremorsâso remote he might be imagining itâwas threatening.
He could cope with it while the lights were on; he could see it in perspective (how do you see a sound?) as one among other things. When he switched off the bedside lamp, the faraway boom became ominous. Its presence was absolute, interior, and continuous, erasing other noises. In a darkness outlined by the perpetual yellow light coming in through the curtains, he waited for sleep. But more than sleep, he waited for the next sound. That vigil subsumed questions that came to him intermittently, and which lacked the immediacy of When will they turn down the music?âquestions like, What am I doing in London? And whatâll I do once Iâm back in India? What do I do if I donât get a First; will a 2:1 suffice? Of course I wonât get a Firstâno one does. When will the Poetry Review send me a reply? Iâve read the stuff they publishâchatty verses are the normâand they should be struck (at least some lonely editor tired of sifting through dry, knowing poems by English poets) by my anguish and music. Such thoughts occurred to him during the day but were now set aside in the interests of followingâin addition to the bass beatâthe movements upstairs. These were abrupt and powerful, as they were when the Patels first woke up at midday, and separated by typical longeurs of silenceâand immobility. The gaps were excruciating, because it was then that Ananda concentrated hardest, avidly trying to decide if activity had ended for the night. By now the music would be so faint that heâd have to strain to hear the dull electronic heartbeat. But strain is what he wanted to do; to devote, eyes shut, his whole imagination to this exercise.
*
It was odd. He hadnât realised till he moved to this flat that floorboards could be so porous; and that this perviousness was an established feature of English coexistence. âBut we were colonised by them,â he thought. âHow is it that our cities are so different? How come Iâm so little prepared for here?â He briefly sought but couldnât find a connection between London and Bombayâexcept, of course, the red double-decker buses and postboxes. It made him ill at easeâover and above having to swallow the insult of having been ruled by this nation! A nation now in turmoil, with Arthur Scargill browbeating television anchors, and the indomitable grocerâs daughter unleashing policemen on horses on the miners. Ananda himself was barely aware that it was all over, that the red-faced Scargillâs time was up, and that his refrain, âAt the end of the dayâ, had caught up with him sooner than youâd have guessed two years ago. Ananda was disengaged from Indian politics but dilettantishly addicted to British politiciansâthe debates; the mock outrage; the amazing menu of accents; the warmth of Tony Bennâs sâs and his inexorable fireside eloquence; the way he cradled his pipe; the wiry trade union leaders, blown into the void by Mrs Thatcherâs booming, unbudging rebuttals. It was a great spectacle, British politicsââand the actual participants and the obligatory ways in which they expressed disagreement (âThat is the most ridiculous tosh Iâve ever heardâ; âExcuse me, but I belong to a family thatâs been working class for generationsâ) was even more entertaining than the moist nonsense that their Spitting Image counterparts regularly sputtered.
*
Class! Heâd hardly been aware of it before coming to Englandâwhich was not so much an indication that it didnât exist in India as of the fact that the privileged were hardly conscious of it, as they were barely conscious of historyâbecause they didnât dream they were inhabiting it, so much did they take it for granted. History was what had happened; class was something you read about in a book. Living in London, he was becoming steadily conscious of it, and not only of race, which was often uppermost in his mind. Who had spoken of the âconscience of my raceâ? He couldnât remember. It sounded like a bogus formulationâprobably some British orator, some old fart, maybe Winston Churchill. Then again, maybe not. Could it be a poet? Poets said the oddest thingsâodd for poets, that is. Heâd discovered that the words heâd ascribed to some populist sloganeer and even, unconsciously, to Marx actually belonged to âA Defence of Poetryâ; there, Shelley had proclaimed: âThe rich have become richer, the poor have become poorer; and the vessel of the State is driven between the Scylla and Charybdis of anarchy and despotism.â How astute of Shelley to have noticed; and to have made that throwaway observation well before Marx made his advent into London! Marx had come here in 1846, and Shelleyâs Defence was published in 1840, belatedly, nineteen years after it was composed; had the bearded one noticed it, picked it up, investigatedâdid Marx read poetry? Did he like poets? Certainly, it appeared to Ananda that, in England now, the rich had suddenly become richerâbut he could be wrong; he was no good at economics; his sights were set on the Olympian, the Parnassian: especially getting published in Poetry Review. He had a notion that the poor were becoming poorer, though he didnât connect this with the pit closures. His uncle had been made redundant. Serves him right. Poor man. But, if you thought about it, there was money about and people were celebrating it, the pubs in central London near his studio flat looked less despondent and ruffianly, theyâd become smarter, even the curry as a consequence of this new financial self-confidence was in ascendancy, not the old spicy beef curry and rice heâd tasted first when heâd visited London as a child, nor even the homemade Indian food that left smells in hallways which white-skinned neighbours complained of, but a smart new acceptable curry, integer of the cityâs recent commercial success and boom. Even before heâd journeyed to England this time, to start out as a student, heâd heard that money was flowing in from North Sea Oil. Lucky bastards. Lucky for Thatcherâlike a gift to her from Poseidon, or whoever the appropriate god was (he was poor in Greek mythology). Poseidon had also given her a hand at the Falklands, a war the British should have lost if only because they were Britishâhe was angry about that. Lucky island, with more than its fair share of windfalls, rewards, and fortune. In his own land, all three million square kilometres of it, theyâd dug and drilled but couldnât find a single vein of oil there, nor in the oceans surrounding its deceptively plump finger-like promontory from which Sri Lanka seemed to trickle off like a drop of water. This happy breed of men, this little world. This precious stone set in the silver sea. They were doing all right.
*
He didnât feel prosperous. Thatâs because he wasnât. His father was going bankrupt paying for this studio flatâand for his tuition fees which (since he was an Indian) were a few thousand pounds while domestic students paid nothing. Thatcher was responsible; but he bore her no personal ill-willâhe was willing to overlook some of her shortcomings for being so integral to the great British show. When he marvelled at her emphatic delivery, sitting in front of the TV, it was her performance he was concerned with and not her wordsânor did he connect her directly with the murderous fees his father was paying.
Carrying more than 500 dollars when you were abroad violated FERA regulations; so his father had devised the following method around them. Anandaâs uncle disbursed monthly largesse among relatives living in Shillong and Calcuttaâmainly in Shillong, with straggly families displaced during Partitionâthe principal sum going to an older brother. This made Radhesh (his uncle) feel kingly, and succumb to the tribulations of being a king on whom many were dependent. He could never forget the irony that the familyâincluding this older brotherâhad dealt with him in his childhood largely with remonstrances, seen him as a bit of a loafer, and that he, buoyed up by the British pound (even though heâd recently been made redundant), was now helping them. âThe reason I didnât marry,â he claimed in one of his monologues, âwas because Iââhe patted his frail chest lightlyââwanted to be there for my family.â Thatâs not entirely true. You are, and always have been, afraid of women. Now Anandaâs father made all those payments to those remote towns in the hills; the equivalent amount was transferred monthly from Anandaâs uncleâs National Westminster account to Anandaâs. In this manner, FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulations Act) was subverted but not exactly flouted, and Anandaâs low-key, apparently purposeless education was made possible. It was an arrangement that both satisfied and exacerbated his uncle. His aristocratic urge to preside and dispenseâtrapped within his slight five-foot-eight-inch frameâwas appeased, but his precious need for privacy (he was a bachelor, after all) was compromised.
Because of the paucity of money at any given time (though Ananda didnât consciously think himself poor; heâd been born into comfort, and, since affluence is a state of mind, he possessed a primal sense of being well-off), Ananda had to ration his recurrent expenditure on lunch, dinner, books, and pornographic magazines. The last comprised all he knew at this moment of coitus. They were a let-down. He anyway suffered from a suspicion that the women were only pretending to enjoy sex, and this consciousness was a wedge between him and his own enjoyment. He required pornography to be a communal joy, shared equally between photographer, participant, and masturbator. But his suspicion was reinforced by Thatcherâs repression of the hardcore. The menâs penises, if you glimpsed them, were limp. There was hardly anyt...