PART ONE
RESIST
INTRODUCTION
âThe Lion of Judah has prevailed.â
âSlogan associated with Haile Selassie and with Ethiopia
They scrambled down into the pass, their thickly-callused bare feet ignoring the bite of the rocks and stones, their swords and spears held high. If they didnât have swords or spears to carry, they would wield sticks and clubs. Some were armed with rifles, but these were often old, practically relicsâtheir saving grace was the fact that they took a variety of cartridges. The buffalo-hide shields would do nothing to stop bullets, but they would block the bayonets slammed forward by the fierce askarisânative soldiers brown like themselves, born like themselves in the Horn of Africa, but now serving a colonial master. Unlike the askaris, most of the Ethiopians wore the traditional shamma, a toga-like garment that their ancestors had donned for generations. You could have painted the whole scene in oils like a war mural hung in Londonâs National Gallery, or preserved it in a sepia photograph âŚ
Until the tanks rolled in.
And then it was no longer a vintage scene of colonial warfare; it was a grotesque tableau of anachronism. This was not a page out of the Book of Empire from the eighteenth or nineteenth centuries. This was December 1935.
At first, the more ignorant warriors took these strange, lumbering metal things for monsters and ran. But one of them, fearless and proud, circled around and jumped onto a tank, pounding on its tin shell casing. Machine guns were blazing away and slicing men in half, and still the Ethiopians swarmed and flooded their numbers into the narrow gorge of what is called Dembeguina Pass, overwhelming the enemy. When it was finally dusk, the men and their brilliant commander, Imru, would slip away with fifty captured machine guns.
Miles awayâbeyond the frontier with Sudan, beyond Egypt and Libya and across the Mediterraneanâthe original Strongman of Europe sat behind the desk in his cavernous office in Rome and fumed, his eyebrows knit in frustration below his stolid dome. Benito Mussolini was furious. This was not how his grand campaign was supposed to go. It wasnât so much that the Ethiopians were winningâso far, overall, they werenât. But they were not clearly losing. And the world watched and was amazed at the defiant courage of âsavages.â
Hadnât his armies practically strolled into enemy territory, easily taking towns in the north? And when his general in charge had vacillated, hadnât he moved to act, replacing the old codger with his armyâs chief of staff? But still the war was not the continuous triumph he longed for. A month before, a skirmish at a place called Ende Giorgis had made headlines around the world because the Ethiopians had gotten the upper hand there, too. They were not supposed to do well! They were only supposed to fight and bleed and die, and let the glorious new Roman Empire be born.
But a tiny man of five foot fourâas self-contained as Mussolini was wildly expansiveâsaid no. Haile Selassie, the Emperor of Ethiopia, the Lion of Judah, insisted that the age of white colonialism was past. His warriors were only fighting now because it was a last resort, and he would not break his faith in God and the assertion that men of noble stature should keep their word and play by the rules. African monarchs had said no beforeâand been ignoredâbut this king had such presence of dignity, such gentle eloquence, that he could not be so easily dismissed. He said no.
But more importantly, most of the world was listening and, for the very first time, was also saying no.
In London, outraged liberals tangled with Oswald Mosleyâs Blackshirts, who naturally supported the invasion. Demonstrators in Toulouse, France, attacked a group of Italian sailors who wanted to go home to serve. Down in Accra, the capital of the British-held Gold Coast, about five hundred black citizens wanted to sign up to go fight for Ethiopia; in Cape Town, South Africa, six thousand black citizens turned up at a government office, wanting the same, to fight for distant comrades. Muslim Arabs in French and Spanish Morocco put together a small mercenary army, intent on crossing the Sahara and winding their way along the Upper Nile to go fight. Sympathetic Communists wreaked havoc in Mexico City, brawling with police armed with rifles. The Ethiopia Crisis could be felt as far away as South America and even touched Asia. The news was everywhere, inescapable, and the word was going out that Haile Selassieâs soldiers would not simply roll over and accept the inevitable.
In America, support was arguably at its highest. On a hot afternoon back in August, an estimated twenty thousand people had poured into the streets of New Yorkâs Harlem neighborhood for the cause. Many of those in the throng had taken to calling themselves âAfricanâ in a remarkable show of black power before the term had even been coined. Here were African Americans marching in an age of barefoot children going to school, a time of âWhites Onlyâ drinking fountains and back entrances at hotels, long before Black Panthers and the pride of Roots, before Marley and Mandela.
âThis is no time to eat ice cream or peel bananas!â a speaker had shouted from the huge wooden platform. People were told to âlisten to the speeches and donate as much money as possible.â Cheers went up as the Ethiopian tricolor of green, yellow, and red was waved in the crowd. Then came the shouting, the chanting: âDeath to Fascism!â and âDown with Mussolini!â At the height of the Depression, it was no surprise that one poster read: SIXTEEN MILLION UNEMPLOYED WANT BREAD, NOT BULLETS. The founder of the organization Pioneers of Ethiopia, F. A. Cowan, told the sea of faces that as far as Mussolini was concerned, âWe will show him that the American Negro is going right over into his backyard!â
It was a good line, a line that would make the papers. And many African Americans in the crowd would surely have believed it. They could picture themselves on Ethiopian soil, each with a rifle in his hands, fighting for their distant brothers. This same hope was shared by many in West Africa, and a collection of earnest radical expatriates in London and Paris. All of them, whether American or British, Jamaican or Kenyan, could not possibly have a clue what forces would be brought to bear to prevent them or anyone else from coming to Ethiopiaâs aid.
* * *
For more than a year, the crisis would dominate Western headlines. Ethiopia was a member of the League of Nations, and under the Leagueâs Covenant, members were supposed to defend the African country if it was attacked. The United States, however, was not a member of the League. Still, Franklin Roosevelt was finding it increasingly difficult to stay neutral, as riots broke out between blacks and Italians in New York. As diplomatic overtures would fail and tensions escalate, Great Britain would send its fleet into the Mediterranean, and Mussolini would respond by sending two army divisions to Libya to threaten Egypt.
It would prompt comment from great political leaders of the day, from Winston Churchill to Mahatma Gandhi to Leon Trotsky. Celebrities would weigh in, from George Bernard Shaw to Josephine Baker. It inspired poets, motivated a world-famous inventor, and was turned into a Broadway play that provoked controversy and US government censorship. The war would become business news when secret negotiations were uncovered between Ethiopia and Standard Oil. It would spill into the sports pages with a prize fight between Detroitâs Joe Louis and Italyâs Primo Carnera, becoming a symbolic showdown between black and white. For, in the end, this was how many blacks in America, as well as other parts of Africaâalong with some whites in the United States and Europeâchose to see the conflict. For them, this would be the race war. It was a war that would change the world.
Across the Atlantic, more than a month before the mass protest in Harlem, the League of Nations Union had published its survey of more than eleven million people in Great Britain, a poll that eventually became famously known as the âPeace Ballot.â Among its five questions, it had asked if nations should use economic means to compel an aggressor nation from attacking another. Today, our shorthand for this is âsanctions.â More than ten million people had answered yes, and more than six million were willing to back up the economics with military measures. Every respondent had to know what example was being implied by a question of one nation attacking another: Italy versus Ethiopia. The results of the Peace Ballot clearly indicated that yes, the British public wanted peace, but not at any price. British citizens were willing to defend an ally.
But their government would eventually allow Mussolini to have his war. So would France. Roosevelt, anxious about the coming election in 1936, would refuse to involve the United States. Alone, Ethiopia would fight to defend itself, and against all odds, it would hold its ownâfor a while. Italian planes would drop poison gas on its soldiers and bomb Red Cross hospitals. Italian soldiers would commit atrocities that would never be deemed worthy of a war crimes tribunal. After 1945, the conflict was considered âanother war,â distinct from World War Two, and not worth going back to investigate.
And the world would forget.
* * *
The war once mattered. To cite a superficial but interesting measure of its impact, consider Casablanca. In the film, both the French police captain, Renault, and the freedom fighter, Victor Laszlo, remind Bogartâs hero, Rick Blaine: âYou ran guns to Ethiopia.â Everyone in the audience at the time knew what they were talking about. Laszlo asks rhetorically, âIsnât it strange that you always happen to be fighting on the side of the underdog?â Ethiopia is mentioned in the same breath as the fight against the Fascists in Spain, raising it to the status of a romantic crusade.
The war did indeed once matter. For a brief time, it captured the worldâs attention, stirring feelings of rebellion in Egypt and worrying the colonial masters of South Africa. The conflict would be the real beginning of the decline of the League of Nations that led to World War Two. Some people know this or were given fleeting references to the war in history classes. Itâs presumed that the warâs only relevance is to the League of Nations. What many people donât know is that an arguably far more significant development involving Roosevelt and America also affected eventsâand it, too, hinged on Ethiopia.
So the war is an important turning point in world history. It is African history, and not just because Ethiopia is in Africa. The war shaped the political mind of a continent in ways that so many of us have hardly noticed but that are crucial to understanding our events today. âI was seventeen when Mussolini attacked Ethiopia, an invasion that spurred not only my hatred of that despot but of fascism in general.â
Those words belong to Nelson Mandela.
In his autobiography, Long Walk to Freedom, he wrote: âEthiopia has always held a special place in my own imagination and the prospect of visiting Ethiopia attracted me more strongly than a trip to France, England, and America combined. I felt I would be visiting my own genesis, unearthing the roots of what made me an African. Meeting the Emperor himself would be like shaking hands with history.â1
Africans elsewhere felt the same way. They quite deliberately called the nation âEthiopia,â using the Greek word, and not âAbyssinia,â a Latin corruption of an Arabic label, âHabesha.â WhitesâEuropeans and European-descent Americansâused that term more often. Ethiopia was a fountainhead of legendary culture, where the obelisks and monasteries of Aksum rose in the same era as the Romans and ancient India. As a leading professor of Ghana would later put it, âIf Ethiopians were the brothers of all black people then their historical achievements could be represented as the achievements of all.â2
Itâs little wonder then that thousands of African Americans felt the same, and so the war is a crucial chapter in their history as well. For New York, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Detroit, the capitals of black consciousness in 1935, Ethiopia indeed mattered. It held a spiritual significance for black Americans as an African kingdom where Christianity had flourished since the fourth century. And it was defiantly independent, smack in the middle of the colonial map. The great black historian, John Hope Franklin, wrote in his landmark work, From Slavery to Freedom: âAlmost overnight, even the most provincial among American Negroes became international-minded. Ethiopia was a black nation, and its destruction would symbolize the final victory of whites over blacks.â3 Thousands of African Americans signed up with ad hoc militias to try to keep it that way.
Above all, this war is the story of a courageous people who, despite antiquated weapons and overwhelming odds, held their own against the Italians for as long as they could and came close to invading the Italian-held frontier of Eritrea. They were cheated out of the inheritance of a generation. Mussoliniâs generals ruthlessly exterminated men trained to lead the country into the twentieth century, and the history of Ethiopia might have been quite different had they lived.
Which brings us to Haile Selassie, still held in far more esteem sometimes by foreigners than by his own people, and even the foreign view is often harsh in its judgment. He is overdue for a reappraisal, a task that is for the most part beyond the scope of this narrative. Still, some points regarding him will need to be made, because the war had far-reaching effects into the modern age and how the West treated Africa after the Second World War. Western opinion of Haile Selassie today is often based on now-discredited news reports and on the aftermath of a brutal Derg regime, while the reality of his character at the time was far more complex.
We are no better served by some historians today. In an aggrandizing chronicle ...