Chapter 1: Things Can Only Get Better
The beginning of the boomâŚ
Charles (Hugh Grant): Do you think there really are people who can just go up and say, âHi, babe, nameâs Charles, this is your lucky night...â?
Matthew (John Hannah): Well, if there are, theyâre not English.
Four Weddings and a Funeral
When screenwriter Colin Welland held aloft his Oscar at the 54th Academy Awards on 29 March 1982, he issued Hollywood with a friendly warning: âThe British are coming!â Cheekily quoting Paul Revere, who helped defeat Team GB during the American Revolution, Welland was actually referring to a more recent, and successful, British campaign. Chariots of Fire (Hudson, 1981), a historical drama about UK runners triumphing against the odds at the 1924 Olympics, won three more Oscars that evening, including Best Picture. It was the first UK film to do so since Oliver! (Reed, 1968). And when Gandhi (Attenborough, 1982) followed suit the next year, it gave credence to Wellandâs claim. Unfortunately, it proved many years premature.
Throughout the late 1980s, the British film industry had little to boast about, suffering much the same fate as the rat in Riff-Raff (Loach, 1991), stamped to death by a succession of half-hearted kicks. It was, in the words of critic Alexander Walker, âa near-disaster areaâ, with investment dropping from ÂŁ272 million in 1985 to under ÂŁ79 million in 1989 (2005: 137â138), an unsympathetic Tory government, and plucky production companies such as Palace Pictures and Goldcrest Films collapsing left, right and centre.1 Ironically, Goldcrestâs Revolution (Hudson, 1985), set during the same conflict that made Paul Revere a hero, was one of several costly flops that banished British film to the margins. Our only hopes seemed to come from TV stations such as the BBC and Channel 4, the film production wing of which, started in 1982 and later styled as Film4, impressed with My Beautiful Laundrette (Frears, 1985) and My Left Foot (Sheridan, 1989). But even these minor successes felt like works of the small, rather than the silver, screen.
âWhen I started, the film industry was in a terrible state; terrible kitchen-sink movies of no interest to anyoneâ, says producer Michael Kuhn, who ran PolyGram Filmed Entertainment (hereafter PolyGram) from 1991 to 1999, perhaps the chief sponsor of the Britpop cinema boom. âAnd it seemed to collapse on itself, so instead of thinking bigger, it thought smallerâ (2016).
By the beginning of the 1990s, the country was in a terrible state too. The 1990â91 recession was the longest since the Great Depression of the 1930s, and the bleak winter of Conservative rule had been prolonged a further five years at the 1992 general election. Meanwhile, a Financial Times report estimated that American films earned ten times more than UK offerings at the British box office (Walker 2005: 166), with most indigenous efforts proving unspeakable (Carry On Columbus [Thomas, 1992]), insufferable (Peterâs Friends [Branagh, 1992]) or profoundly depressing (Naked [Leigh, 1993]). Indeed, the latter, starring David Thewlis as the sociopathic Johnny, prowling Londonâs purgatorial streets spitting existential poison at everyone he meets, suggested a Britain â and, by extension, a British film industry â broken beyond repair.
Even the odd genre film produced, such as the spirited, if silly, sci-fi Split Second (Maylam, 1992) and by-the-book cop drama The Young Americans (Cannon, 1993) were in thrall to the United States; featuring slumming-it international stars such as Rutger Hauer and Harvey Keitel, and treating London as just another location. âNot exactly Hollywood is it, sir?â says one British lackey to Keitelâs hotshot NYC detective in The Young Americans. Director Danny Cannon clearly wished it were: his next film was the studio comic-book adaptation Judge Dredd (1995) starring Sylvester Stallone, a film so garishly overblown it made Split Second look like 2001: A Space Odyssey (Kubrick, 1968). Says Four Weddings and a Funeral producer Duncan Kenworthy:
(2016)
In due course, Britpop cinema would produce Friday and Saturday night films aplenty, but it was the success of Four Weddings, perhaps better thought of as a Sunday night film, that ignited âthe firestorm in UK film production, which continued to burn through the rest of the decadeâ (Watson 2005: 83).
For a film that grossed $245 million worldwide (Box Office Mojo 2018e), turned lead actor Hugh Grant into a star and reinvigorated the British film industry, Four Weddings was hardly the most prepossessing of projects. âWhen I commissioned it, no one really rated its chances very highly, because it wasnât commercialâ, says David Aukin, head of film at Channel 4 from 1990 to 1998, âI remember I showed it to my colleagues and they said it would play alright on televisionâ (2016).
Formed in 1982, and co-chaired by Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner since 1992, Four Weddingsâ UK production company was Working Title, which had just released a string of disappointments such as London Kills Me (Kureshi, 1991) and The Young Americans. Writer Richard Curtis, though responsible for Blackadder (1983â89, UK: BBC1), one of Britainâs best-loved sitcoms, had only The Tall Guy (Smith, 1989) on his cinematic CV. Kenworthy, meanwhile, was making his feature debut, and had been more used to working with the Muppets at Jim Henson Productions. Indeed, says Aukin:
Inspired by the deluge of weddings he had attended over the years, Curtis split his script into five distinct sequences/services,3 to which we, the audience, are cordially invited. Combined, they tell the story of bashful London bachelor Charles and his pals, as they search for true love in the marquees of Middle Englandâs recently matched and dispatched. At one such gathering, Charles meets Carrie (Andie MacDowell), a glamorous American, and they start a faltering affair. The real-life inspiration, it turns out, was even more faltering. As Curtis told The Telegraphâs David Gritten:
(2003: n.pag.)
Charles, of course, does go to the hotel and, with Boggle left untouched, begins an on-again/off-again romance distinguished by Carrieâs flightiness and his own furious indecision. To Grantâs credit he manages to make the characterâs dithering more charming than exasperating. This is, after all, a man who, out of terminal politeness or social terror, never says what he means or asks for what he wants. Even his eventual declaration of love to Carrie on Londonâs South Bank is a masterpiece of stammered self-sabotage: âIn the words of David Cassidy in fact, er, while he was still with the Partridge Family, er, âI think I love you,â and, er, I just wondered by any chance you wouldnât like toâŚâ he begins, before deciding, âNo, no, no of course notâ. And all this before sheâs even spoken.
After years of being, as he put it, âthe Nazi brotherâ (Lamont 2014),4 Grant clearly relished the chance to play a romantic lead, but it almost didnât happen. The filmmakers estimate that he was the 70th actor auditioned, and his agent demanded ÂŁ5,000 more than the ÂŁ35,000 offered, until Kenworthy explained there was nothing left in the budget. Though it is difficult to imagine anyone else in the role, back then Grant was hardly classic pin-up material â among his hobbies was playing football⌠for the V&A museumâs side. âWeâre not the hardest team in the worldâ, he admitted. âOur left-back is keeper of seventeenth-century sculptureâ (Walker 2005: 183).
With the leading man in place, and veteran director Mike Newell (Dance with a Stranger [1985], Enchanted April [1991]) onboard, a high-profile actress was sought, because, as Kenworthy notes, âFor all the British work itâs the American star name that gets us the budgetâ. Funding delays gave Curtis the chance to further sharpen his script (he claimed to have written nineteen drafts), while Newell and Kenworthy went to LA to audition actresses.
During casting, the producer found himself playing Charles to several prospective Carries, in a scene that could have come straight from Curtisâs next rom-com, Notting Hill (Michell, 1999). One of the auditionees, the wife of a very famous Hollywood actor, threw herself into the role. Recalls Kenworthy:
Eventually, back in London, the filmmakers met with model-turned-actress Andie MacDowell, star of Green Card (Weir, 1991) and Groundhog Day (Reitman, 1993), who was offered the role for a correspondingly large fee. Not that it mattered. When Four Weddings was released in 1994, it was Grant, Curtis and the British film industry that were the biggest beneficiaries. And not necessarily in that order.
While the finished film is about as far from the Britpop cinema that followed as it is from the cutting edge, if you squint your eyes, there are similarities. Four Weddings does indeed begin with a chase â although it is Charles and his flatmate Scarlett (Charlotte Coleman) swearily speeding to church in her Mini, rather than Scottish junkies or Welsh joy-riders. It also features a gang, each of whom is looking to escape their circumstances. Although again, it is singledom rather than economic depression that is the problem, and they are not âgang membersâ so much as landed gentry: more Peterâs friends than Rentonâs.
Despite being set among the upper/upper-middle classes, Curtisâs script is, in other respects, unusually inclusive. Charlesâ brother David (David Bower) is deaf, as is Bower himself, providing the filmâs (silent) voice of reason through sign language; a nice touch. Gay couple Gareth (Simon Callow) and Matthew are the best-suited pair of the lot, although you do not need to be Inspector Rebus to work out which one will not make it to the end credits.5 Four Weddings also has a noteworthy soundtrack, although it is the ceremony-friendly Elton John and Wet Wet Wet6 rather than Iggy Pop and Underworld.
The Conservatives, under the moderate but much-mocked John Major, clung on to power until 1997, but as Guardian writer Tim Adams notes, there is something of: âNew Labourâs shiny, happy geography in what we have come to know as Curtisland [âŚ] an apolitical place, full of can-do possibility, obsessed with the educated middle class, perfectly relaxed about the filthy rich, much more in love with sentiment than ideas, and insatiable in its optimismâ (2009).
Adams may be overstating the latter quality, but the film is consistently funny. At the opening wedding, Charles and Carrie are interrupted by the hapless John (Simon Kunz). âHowâs your gorgeous girlfriend?â asks Charles. âSheâs no longer my girlfriendâŚâ John begins. âAh, dear. I wouldnât be too gloomy about itâŚâ says Charles, before making a joke about her rumoured infidelity. âSheâs now my wifeâ, finishes John, suitably deflated. Later, Charles introduces himself to a dotty old man (Kenneth Griffith), only to be told, âDonât be ridiculous, Charles died 20 years ago!â Charles, clearly not deceased, ventures, âMust be a different Charles, I think.â Which only enervates the man more. âAre you telling me I donât know my own brother?!â he harrumphs. âNo,â agrees Charles, too polite to argue his own existence.
In these scenes, Grant pitches his performance perfectly, making the most of Curtisâs finely honed material. As the actor told the BBCâs Sian Kirwan, âThe reason I turn down 99 per cent of a hundred, I mean a thousand, scripts is because romantic comedies are often very romantic but seldom very funnyâ (2014).
But Four W...